CloudFlare suffered a massive security issue affecting all of its customers, including Rosetta Code. All passwords not changed since February 19th 2017 have been expired, and session cookie longevity will be reduced until late March.--Michael Mol (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

# Exponentiation operator

Exponentiation operator
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.

Most programming languages have a built-in implementation of exponentiation.

Re-implement integer exponentiation for both   intint   and   floatint   as both a procedure,   and an operator (if your language supports operator definition).

If the language supports operator (or procedure) overloading, then an overloaded form should be provided for both   intint   and   floatint   variants.

First we declare the specifications of the two procedures and the two corresponding operators (written as functions with quoted operators as their names):

`package Integer_Exponentiation is   --  int^int   procedure Exponentiate (Argument : in     Integer;                           Exponent : in     Natural;                           Result   :    out Integer);   function "**" (Left  : Integer;                  Right : Natural) return Integer;    --  real^int   procedure Exponentiate (Argument : in     Float;                           Exponent : in     Integer;                           Result   :    out Float);   function "**" (Left  : Float;                  Right : Integer) return Float;end Integer_Exponentiation;`

Now we can create a test program:

`with Ada.Float_Text_IO, Ada.Integer_Text_IO, Ada.Text_IO;with Integer_Exponentiation; procedure Test_Integer_Exponentiation is   use Ada.Float_Text_IO, Ada.Integer_Text_IO, Ada.Text_IO;   use Integer_Exponentiation;   R : Float;   I : Integer;begin   Exponentiate (Argument => 2.5, Exponent => 3, Result => R);   Put ("2.5 ^ 3 = ");   Put (R, Fore => 2, Aft => 4, Exp => 0);   New_Line;    Exponentiate (Argument => -12, Exponent => 3, Result => I);   Put ("-12 ^ 3 = ");   Put (I, Width => 7);   New_Line;end Test_Integer_Exponentiation;`

Finally we can implement the procedures and operations:

`package body Integer_Exponentiation is   --  int^int   procedure Exponentiate (Argument : in     Integer;                           Exponent : in     Natural;                           Result   :    out Integer) is   begin      Result := 1;      for Counter in 1 .. Exponent loop         Result := Result * Argument;      end loop;   end Exponentiate;    function "**" (Left  : Integer;                  Right : Natural) return Integer is      Result : Integer;   begin      Exponentiate (Argument => Left,                    Exponent => Right,                    Result   => Result);      return Result;   end "**";    --  real^int   procedure Exponentiate (Argument : in     Float;                           Exponent : in     Integer;                           Result   :    out Float) is   begin      Result := 1.0;      if Exponent < 0 then         for Counter in Exponent .. -1 loop            Result := Result / Argument;         end loop;      else         for Counter in 1 .. Exponent loop            Result := Result * Argument;         end loop;      end if;   end Exponentiate;    function "**" (Left  : Float;                  Right : Integer) return Float is      Result : Float;   begin       Exponentiate (Argument => Left,                    Exponent => Right,                    Result   => Result);      return Result;   end "**";end Integer_Exponentiation;`

## ALGOL 68

Works with: ALGOL 68 version Revision 1 - no extensions to language used
Works with: ALGOL 68G version Any - tested with release 1.18.0-9h.tiny
`main:(  INT two=2, thirty=30; # test constants #  PROC VOID undefined; # First implement exponentiation using a rather slow but sure FOR loop #  PROC int pow = (INT base, exponent)INT: ( # PROC cannot be over loaded #    IF exponent<0 THEN undefined FI;    INT out:=( exponent=0 | 1 | base );    FROM 2 TO exponent DO out*:=base OD;    out  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: int pow("g(0)","g(0)")="g(0)" - (cost: "g(0)           " INT multiplications)"l\$,two, thirty, int pow(two,thirty),thirty-1)); # implement exponentiation using a faster binary technique and WHILE LOOP #  OP ** = (INT base, exponent)INT: (    BITS binary exponent:=BIN exponent ; # do exponent arithmetic in binary #    INT out := IF bits width ELEM binary exponent THEN base ELSE 1 FI;    INT sq := IF exponent < 0 THEN undefined; ~ ELSE base FI;     WHILE      binary exponent := binary exponent SHR 1;      binary exponent /= BIN 0    DO      sq *:= sq;      IF bits width ELEM binary exponent THEN out *:= sq FI    OD;    out  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0)"**"g(0)"="g(0)" - (cost: "g(0)           " INT multiplications)"l\$,two, thirty, two ** thirty,8));   OP ** = (REAL in base, INT in exponent)REAL: ( # ** INT Operator can be overloaded #    REAL base := ( in exponent<0 | 1/in base | in base);    INT exponent := ABS in exponent;    BITS binary exponent:=BIN exponent ; # do exponent arithmetic in binary #    REAL out := IF bits width ELEM binary exponent THEN base ELSE 1 FI;    REAL sq := base;     WHILE      binary exponent := binary exponent SHR 1;      binary exponent /= BIN 0    DO      sq *:= sq;      IF bits width ELEM binary exponent THEN out *:= sq FI    OD;    out  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0,1)"**"g(0)"="g(0,1)" - (cost: "g(0)           " REAL multiplications)"l\$, 2.0, thirty, 2.0 ** thirty,8));   OP ** = (REAL base, REAL exponent)REAL: ( # ** REAL Operator can be overloaded #    exp(ln(base)*exponent)  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0,1)"**"g(0,1)"="g(0,1)" - (cost: "           "depends on precision)"l\$, 2.0, 30.0, 2.0 ** 30.0)))`
Output:
```One Gibi-unit is: int pow(2,30)=1073741824 - (cost: 29 INT multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2**30=1073741824 - (cost: 8 INT multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2.0**30=1073741824.0 - (cost: 8 REAL multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2.0**30.0=1073741824.0 - (cost: depends on precision)```

### Recursive operator calls

Works with: ALGOL 68 version Revision 1 - no extensions to language used
Works with: ALGOL 68G version Any - tested with release 1.18.0-9h.tiny
`main:(  INT two=2, thirty=30; # test constants #  PROC VOID undefined; # First implement exponentiation using a rather slow but sure FOR loop #  PROC int pow = (INT base, exponent)INT: ( # PROC cannot be over loaded #    IF exponent<0 THEN undefined FI;    INT out:=( exponent=0 | 1 | base );    FROM 2 TO exponent DO out*:=base OD;    out  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: int pow("g(0)","g(0)")="g(0)" - (cost: "g(0)           " INT multiplications)"l\$,two, thirty, int pow(two,thirty),thirty-1)); # implement exponentiation using a faster binary technique and WHILE LOOP #  OP ** = (INT base, exponent)INT:    IF   base = 0 THEN 0 ELIF base = 1 THEN 1    ELIF exponent = 0 THEN 1 ELIF exponent = 1 THEN base    ELIF ODD exponent THEN      (base*base) ** (exponent OVER 2) * base    ELSE      (base*base) ** (exponent OVER 2)    FI;   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0)"**"g(0)"="g(0)" - (cost: "g(0)           " INT multiplications)"l\$,two, thirty, two ** thirty,8));   OP ** = (REAL in base, INT in exponent)REAL: ( # ** INT Operator can be overloaded #    REAL base := ( in exponent<0 | 1/in base | in base);    INT exponent := ABS in exponent;    IF   base = 0 THEN 0 ELIF base = 1 THEN 1    ELIF exponent = 0 THEN 1 ELIF exponent = 1 THEN base    ELIF ODD exponent THEN      (base*base) ** (exponent OVER 2) * base    ELSE      (base*base) ** (exponent OVER 2)    FI  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0,1)"**"g(0)"="g(0,1)" - (cost: "g(0)           " REAL multiplications)"l\$, 2.0, thirty, 2.0 ** thirty,8));   OP ** = (REAL base, REAL exponent)REAL: ( # ** REAL Operator can be overloaded #    exp(ln(base)*exponent)  );   printf((\$" One Gibi-unit is: "g(0,1)"**"g(0,1)"="g(0,1)" - (cost: "           "depends on precision)"l\$, 2.0, 30.0, 2.0 ** 30.0)))`
Output:
``` One Gibi-unit is: int pow(2,30)=1073741824 - (cost: 29 INT multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2**30=1073741824 - (cost: 8 INT multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2.0**30=1073741824.0 - (cost: 8 REAL multiplications)
One Gibi-unit is: 2.0**30.0=1073741824.0 - (cost: depends on precision)
```

## AutoHotkey

`MsgBox % Pow(5,3)MsgBox % Pow(2.5,4) Pow(x, n){	r:=1	loop %n%		r *= x	return r}`

## AWK

Traditional awk implementations do not provide an exponent operator, so we define a function to calculate the exponent. This one-liner reads base and exponent from stdin, one pair per line, and writes the result to stdout:

`\$ awk 'function pow(x,n){r=1;for(i=0;i<n;i++)r=r*x;return r}{print pow(\$1,\$2)}' `
Output:
```2.5 2
6.25
10 6
1000000
3 0
1
But this last exponentation is wrong :
10 140
100000000000000048235962126657397336628942202864391877882749784196997612045996878213993935631944257381261260379071613194067266765009513873408
This is because traditionnal awk treat number internaly by finite precision.
```
`If you want to use arbitrary precision number with (more recent) awk, you have to use -M option :\$ gawk -M '{ printf("%f\n",\$1^\$2) }' `
Output:
```10 140
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000,000000
```
`And if you want to use locales for decimal separator, you have tu use -N option :\$ gawk -N '{ printf("%f\n",\$1^\$2) }' `
Output:
```2,5 2
6,250000
```

## BASIC

Works with: QBasic

The vast majority of BASIC implementations don't support defining custom operators, or overloading of any kind.

`DECLARE FUNCTION powL& (x AS INTEGER, y AS INTEGER)DECLARE FUNCTION powS# (x AS SINGLE, y AS INTEGER) DIM x AS INTEGER, y AS INTEGERDIM a AS SINGLE RANDOMIZE TIMERa = RND * 10x = INT(RND * 10)y = INT(RND * 10)PRINT x, y, powL&(x, y)PRINT a, y, powS#(a, y) FUNCTION powL& (x AS INTEGER, y AS INTEGER)    DIM n AS INTEGER, m AS LONG    IF x <> 0 THEN        m = 1        IF SGN(y) > 0 THEN            FOR n = 1 TO y                m = m * x            NEXT        END IF    END IF    powL& = mEND FUNCTION FUNCTION powS# (x AS SINGLE, y AS INTEGER)    DIM n AS INTEGER, m AS DOUBLE    IF x <> 0 THEN        m = 1        IF y <> 0 THEN            FOR n = 1 TO y                m = m * x            NEXT            IF y < 0 THEN m = 1# / m        END IF    END IF    powS# = mEND FUNCTION`
Output:
``` 0             8             0
7.768213      8             13260781.61887441
1             9             1
2.707636      9             7821.90151734948
8             2             64
9.712946      2             94.34131879665438
```

## BBC BASIC

`      PRINT "11^5 = " ; FNipow(11, 5)      PRINT "PI^3 = " ; FNfpow(PI, 3)      END       DEF FNipow(A%, B%)      LOCAL I%, P%      P% = 1      FOR I% = 1 TO 32        P% *= P%        IF B% < 0 THEN P% *= A%        B% = B% << 1      NEXT      = P%       DEF FNfpow(A, B%)      LOCAL I%, P      P = 1      FOR I% = 1 TO 32        P *= P        IF B% < 0 THEN P *= A        B% = B% << 1      NEXT      = P`
Output:
```11^5 = 161051
PI^3 = 31.0062767```

## Befunge

Note: Only works for integer bases and powers.

`v         v       \<>&:32p&1-\>32g*\1-:|                   \$                   .                   @`

## Brat

`#Procedureexp = { base, exp |  1.to(exp).reduce 1, { m, n | m = m * base }} #Numbers are weird1.parent.^ = { rhs |  num = my  1.to(rhs).reduce 1 { m, n | m = m * num }} p exp 2 5 #Prints 32p 2 ^ 5   #Prints 32`

## C

Two versions are given - one for integer bases, the other for floating point. The integer version returns 0 when the abs(base) is != 1 and the exponent is negative.

`#include <stdio.h>#include <assert.h> int ipow(int base, int exp){   int pow = base;   int v = 1;   if (exp < 0) {      assert (base != 0);  /* divide by zero */      return (base*base != 1)? 0: (exp&1)? base : 1;   }    while(exp > 0 )   {      if (exp & 1) v *= pow;      pow *= pow;      exp >>= 1;    }   return v;} double dpow(double base, int exp){   double v=1.0;   double pow = (exp <0)? 1.0/base : base;   if (exp < 0) exp = - exp;    while(exp > 0 )   {      if (exp & 1) v *= pow;      pow *= pow;      exp >>= 1;   }   return v;} int main(){    printf("2^6 = %d\n", ipow(2,6));    printf("2^-6 = %d\n", ipow(2,-6));    printf("2.71^6 = %lf\n", dpow(2.71,6));    printf("2.71^-6 = %lf\n", dpow(2.71,-6));}`

The C11 standard features type-generic expressions via the _Generic keyword. We can add to the above example to use this feature.

Works with: Clang version 3.0+
` #define generic_pow(base, exp)\    _Generic((base),\            double: dpow,\            int: ipow)\    (base, exp) int main(){    printf("2^6 = %d\n", generic_pow(2,6));    printf("2^-6 = %d\n", generic_pow(2,-6));    printf("2.71^6 = %lf\n", generic_pow(2.71,6));    printf("2.71^-6 = %lf\n", generic_pow(2.71,-6));} `

## C#

In C# it is possible to overload operators (+, -, *, etc..), but to do so requires the overload to implement at least one argument as the calling type.

What this means, is that if we have the class, A, to do an overload of + - we must set one of the arguments as the type "A". This is because in C#, overloads are defined on a class basis - so when doing an operator, .Net looks at the class to find the operators. In this manner, one of the arguments must be of the class, else .Net would be looking there in vain.

This again means, that a direct overloading of the ^-character between two integers / double and integer is not possible.

However - coming to think of it, one could overload the "int" class, and enter the operator there. --LordMike 17:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

` static void Main(string[] args){	Console.WriteLine("5^5 = " + Expon(5, 5));	Console.WriteLine("5.5^5 = " + Expon(5.5, 5));	Console.ReadLine();} static double Expon(int Val, int Pow) {	return Math.Pow(Val, Pow);}static double Expon(double Val, int Pow){	return Math.Pow(Val, Pow);} `
Output:
```5^5 = 3125
5.5^5 = 5032,84375
```

## C++

While C++ does allow operator overloading, it does not have an exponentiation operator, therefore only a function definition is given. For non-negative exponents the integer and floating point versions are exactly the same, for obvious reasons. For negative exponents, the integer exponentiation would not give integer results; therefore there are several possibilities:

1. Use floating point results even for integer exponents.
2. Use integer results for integer exponents and give an error for negative exponents.
3. Use integer results for integer exponents and return just the integer part (i.e. return 0 if the base is larger than one and the exponent is negative).

The third option somewhat resembles the integer division rules, and has the nice property that it can use the exact same algorithm as the floating point version. Therefore this option is chosen here. Actually the template can be used with any type which supports multiplication, division and explicit initialization from int. Note that there are several aspects about int which are not portably defined; most notably it is not guaranteed

• that the negative of a valid int is again a valid int; indeed for most implementations, the minimal value doesn't have a positive counterpart,
• whether the result of a%b is positive or negative if a is negative, and in which direction the corresponding division is rounded (however, it is guaranteed that (a/b)*b + a%b == a)

The code below tries to avoid those platform dependencies. Note that bitwise operations wouldn't help here either, because the representation of negative numbers can vary as well.

`template<typename Number> Number power(Number base, int exponent){  int zerodir;  Number factor;  if (exponent < 0)  {    zerodir = 1;    factor = Number(1)/base;  }  else  {    zerodir = -1;    factor = base;  }   Number result(1);  while (exponent != 0)  {    if (exponent % 2 != 0)    {      result *= factor;      exponent += zerodir;    }    else    {      factor *= factor;      exponent /= 2;    }  }  return result;}`

## Clojure

Operators in Clojure are functions, so this satisfies both requirements. Also, this is polymorphic- it will work with integers, floats, etc, even ratios. (Since operators are implemented as functions they are used in prefix notation)

`(defn ** [x n] (reduce * (repeat n x)))`

Usage:

```(** 2 3)        ; 8
(** 7.2 2.1)    ; 373.24800000000005
(** 7/2 3)      ; 343/8```

## Common Lisp

Common Lisp has a few forms of iteration. One of the more general is the do loop. Using the do loop, one definition is given below:

`(defun my-expt-do (a b)  (do ((x 1 (* x a))       (y 0 (+ y 1)))      ((= y b) x)))`

do takes three forms. The first is a list of variable initializers and incrementers. In this case, x, the eventual return value, is initialized to 1, and every iteration of the do loop replaces the value of x with x * a. Similarly, y is initialized to 0 and is replaced with y + 1. The second is a list of conditions and return values. In this case, when y = b, the loop stops, and the current value of x is returned. Common Lisp has no explicit return keyword, so x ends up being the return value for the function. The last form is the body of the loop, and usually consists of some action to perform (that has some side-effect). In this case, all the work is being done by the first and second forms, so there are no extra actions.

Of course, Lisp programmers often prefer recursive solutions.

`(defun my-expt-rec (a b)  (cond     ((= b 0) 1)    (t (* a (my-expt-rec a (- b 1))))))`

This solution uses the fact that a^0 = 1 and that a^b = a * a^{b-1}. cond is essentially a generalized if-statement. It takes a list of forms of the form (cond result). For instance, in this case, if b = 0, then function returns 1. t is the truth constant in Common Lisp and is often used as a default condition (similar to the default keyword in C/C++/Java or the else block in many languages).

Common Lisp has much more lenient rules for identifiers. In particular, ^ is a valid CL identifier. Since it is not already defined in the standard library, we can simply use it as a function name, just like any other function.

`(defun ^ (a b)  (do ((x 1 (* x a))       (y 0 (+ y 1)))      ((= y b) x)))`

## D

Translation of: Python
Translation of: C++

D has a built-in exponentiation operator: ^^

`import std.stdio, std.conv; struct Number(T) {    T x; // base    alias x this;    string toString() const { return text(x); }     Number opBinary(string op)(in int exponent)    const pure nothrow @nogc if (op == "^^") in {        if (exponent < 0)            assert (x != 0, "Division by zero");    } body {        debug puts("opBinary ^^");         int zerodir;        T factor;        if (exponent < 0) {            zerodir = +1;            factor = T(1) / x;        } else {            zerodir = -1;            factor = x;        }         T result = 1;        int e = exponent;        while (e != 0)            if (e % 2 != 0) {                result *= factor;                e += zerodir;            } else {                factor *= factor;                e /= 2;            }         return Number(result);    }} void main() {    alias Double = Number!double;    writeln(Double(2.5) ^^ 5);     alias Int = Number!int;    writeln(Int(3) ^^ 3);    writeln(Int(0) ^^ -2); // Division by zero.}`
Output:

(Compiled in debug mode, stack trace removed)

```[email protected]/* <![CDATA[ */!function(t,e,r,n,c,a,p){try{t=document.currentScript||function(){for(t=document.getElementsByTagName('script'),e=t.length;e--;)if(t[e].getAttribute('data-cfhash'))return t[e]}();if(t&&(c=t.previousSibling)){p=t.parentNode;if(a=c.getAttribute('data-cfemail')){for(e='',r='0x'+a.substr(0,2)|0,n=2;a.length-n;n+=2)e+='%'+('0'+('0x'+a.substr(n,2)^r).toString(16)).slice(-2);p.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(decodeURIComponent(e)),c)}p.removeChild(t)}}catch(u){}}()/* ]]> */_operator.d(11): Division by zero
opBinary ^^
97.6563
opBinary ^^
27
opBinary```

## E

Simple, unoptimized implementation which will accept any kind of number for the base. If the base is an `int`, then the result will be of type `float64` if the exponent is negative, and `int` otherwise.

`def power(base, exponent :int) {    var r := base    if (exponent < 0) {        for _ in exponent..0 { r /= base }    } else if (exponent <=> 0) {        return 1    } else {        for _ in 2..exponent { r *= base }    }    return r}`

## EchoLisp

` ;; this exponentiation function handles integer, rational or float x.;; n is a positive or negative integer. (define (** x n) (cond     ((zero? n) 1)     ((< n 0) (/ (** x (- n)))) ;; x**-n = 1 / x**n    ((= n 1) x)     ((= n 0) 1)     ((odd? n) (* x (** x (1- n)))) ;; x**(2p+1) = x * x**2p    (else (let ((m (** x (/ n 2)))) (* m m))))) ;; x**2p = (x**p) * (x**p) (** 3 0) → 1(** 3 4) → 81(** 3 5) → 243(** 10 10) → 10000000000(** 1.3 10) → 13.785849184900007 (** -3 5) → -243(** 3 -4) → 1/81(** 3.7 -4) → 0.005335720890574502(** 2/3 7) → 128/2187 (lib 'bigint)(** 666 42) → 38540524895511613165266748863173814985473295063157418576769816295283207864908351682948692085553606681763707358759878656  `

## Ela

Ela standard prelude already defines an exponentiation operator (**) but we will implement it by ourselves anyway:

`open number _ ^ 0           =  1x ^ n | n > 0   =  f x (n - 1) x      |else = fail "Negative exponent"  where f _ 0 y = y        f a d y = g a d          where g b i | even i  = g (b * b) (i `quot` 2)                      | else = f b (i - 1) (b * y) (12 ^ 4, 12 ** 4)`
Output:
`(20736,20736)`

Ela supports generic arithmetic functions and generic numeric literals. This is how we can change an implementation of a (^) function and make it generic:

`open number //Function quot from number module is defined only for//integral numbers. We can use this as an universal quot.uquot x y | x is Integral = x `quot` y          | else = x / y //Changing implementation by using generic numeric literals//(e.g. 2u) and elimitating all comparisons with 0.!x ^ n  | n ~= 0u = 1u        | n > 0u  =  f x (n - 1u) x        | else = fail "Negative exponent"  where f a d y          | d ~= 0u = y          | else = g a d          where g b i | even i  = g (b * b) (i `uquot` 2u)                      | else = f b (i - 1u) (b * y)  (12 ^ 4, 12.34 ^ 4.04)`
Output:
`(20736,286138.2f)`

We have a case of true polymorphism here and no overloading is required. However Ela supports overloading using classes (somewhat similar to Haskell type classes) so we can show how the same implementation could work with overloading (less preferable in this case because of more redundant code but still possible):

`open number //A class that defines our overloadable functionclass Exponent a where  (^) a->a->_ //Implementation for integersinstance Exponent Int where  _ ^ 0           =  1  x ^ n | n > 0   =  f x (n - 1) x        |else = fail "Negative exponent"    where f _ 0 y = y          f a d y = g a d            where g b i | even i  = g (b * b) (i `quot` 2)                        | else = f b (i - 1) (b * y) //Implementation for floatsinstance Exponent Single where  x ^ n | n < 0.001 = 1        | n > 0 =  f x (n - 1) x        | else = fail "Negative exponent"    where f a d y            | d < 0.001 = y            | else = g a d            where g b i | even i  = g (b * b) (i / 2)                        | else = f b (i - 1) (b * y) (12 ^ 4, 12.34 ^ 4.04)`
Output:
`(20736,286138.2f)`

## Elixir

`defmodule My do  def exp(x,y) when is_integer(x) and is_integer(y) and y>=0 do    IO.write("int>   ")         # debug test    exp_int(x,y)  end  def exp(x,y) when is_integer(y) do    IO.write("float> ")         # debug test    exp_float(x,y)  end  def exp(x,y), do: (IO.write("       "); :math.pow(x,y))   defp exp_int(_,0), do: 1  defp exp_int(x,y), do: Enum.reduce(1..y, 1, fn _,acc -> x * acc end)   defp exp_float(_,y) when y==0, do: 1.0  defp exp_float(x,y) when y<0, do: 1/exp_float(x,-y)  defp exp_float(x,y), do: Enum.reduce(1..y, 1, fn _,acc -> x * acc end)end list = [{2,0}, {2,3}, {2,-2},        {2.0,0}, {2.0,3}, {2.0,-2},        {0.5,0}, {0.5,3}, {0.5,-2},        {-2,2}, {-2,3}, {-2.0,2}, {-2.0,3},        ]IO.puts "                    ___My.exp___  __:math.pow_"Enum.each(list, fn {x,y} ->  sxy = "#{x} ** #{y}"  sexp = inspect My.exp(x,y)  spow = inspect :math.pow(x,y)         # For the comparison  :io.fwrite("~10s = ~12s, ~12s~n", [sxy, sexp, spow])end)`
Output:
```                    ___My.exp___  __:math.pow_
int>       2 ** 0 =            1,          1.0
int>       2 ** 3 =            8,          8.0
float>    2 ** -2 =         0.25,         0.25
float>   2.0 ** 0 =          1.0,          1.0
float>   2.0 ** 3 =          8.0,          8.0
float>  2.0 ** -2 =         0.25,         0.25
float>   0.5 ** 0 =          1.0,          1.0
float>   0.5 ** 3 =        0.125,        0.125
float>  0.5 ** -2 =          4.0,          4.0
int>      -2 ** 2 =            4,          4.0
int>      -2 ** 3 =           -8,         -8.0
float>  -2.0 ** 2 =          4.0,          4.0
float>  -2.0 ** 3 =         -8.0,         -8.0
```

## Erlang

Works with: Erlang version OTP R14B02 and higher

pow(number, integer) -> number

` pow(X, Y) when Y < 0 ->    1/pow(X, -Y);pow(X, Y) when is_integer(Y) ->    pow(X, Y, 1). pow(_, 0, B) ->    B;pow(X, Y, B) ->    B2 = if Y rem 2 =:= 0 -> B; true -> X * B end,    pow(X * X, Y div 2, B2). `

Tail call optimised version which works for both integers and float bases.

## ERRE

ERRE does not permit operator overloading, so we can use a procedure only. The procedure below handles *integer powers*: for floating point exponent you must use EXP and LOG predefined functions.

`PROGRAM POWER PROCEDURE POWER(A,B->POW)   ! this routine handles only *INTEGER* powers  LOCAL FLAG%  IF B<0 THEN B=-B FLAG%=TRUE  POW=1  FOR X=1 TO B DO    POW=POW*A  END FOR  IF FLAG% THEN POW=1/POWEND PROCEDURE BEGIN   POWER(11,-2->POW) PRINT(POW)   POWER(π,3->POW) PRINT(POW)END PROGRAM`
Output:
``` 8.264463E-03
31.00628
```

## Factor

Simple, unoptimized implementation which accepts a positive or negative exponent:

`: pow ( f n -- f' )    dup 0 < [ abs pow recip ]    [ [ 1 ] 2dip swap [ * ] curry times ] if ;`

Here is a recursive implementation which splits the exponent in two:

`: pow ( f n -- f' )    {          { [ dup 0 < ] [ abs pow recip ] }        { [ dup 0 = ] [ 2drop 1 ] }        [ [ 2 mod 1 = swap 1 ? ] [ [ sq ] [ 2 /i ] bi* pow ] 2bi * ]    } cond ;`

This implementation recurses only when an odd factor is found:

`USING: combinators kernel math ;IN: test : (pow) ( f n -- f' )    [ dup even? ] [ [ sq ] [ 2 /i ] bi* ] while    dup 1 = [ drop ] [ dupd 1 - (pow) * ] if ; : pow ( f n -- f' )    {        { [ dup 0 < ] [ abs (pow) recip ] }        { [ dup 0 = ] [ 2drop 1 ] }        [ (pow) ]    } cond ;`

A non-recursive version of (pow) can be written as:

`: (pow) ( f n -- f' )    [ 1 ] 2dip         [ dup 1 = ] [        dup even? [ [ sq ] [ 2 /i ] bi* ] [ [ [ * ] keep ] dip 1 - ] if    ] until    drop * ;`

## Forth

`: ** ( n m -- n^m )  1 swap  0 ?do over * loop  nip ;`
`: f**n ( f n -- f^n )  dup 0= if    drop fdrop 1e  else dup 1 and if    1- fdup recurse f*  else    2/ fdup f* recurse  then then ;`

## Fortran

Works with: Fortran version 90 and later
`MODULE Exp_ModIMPLICIT NONE INTERFACE OPERATOR (.pow.)    ! Using ** instead would overload the standard exponentiation operator  MODULE PROCEDURE Intexp, RealexpEND INTERFACE CONTAINS   FUNCTION Intexp (base, exponent)    INTEGER :: Intexp    INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: base, exponent    INTEGER :: i     IF (exponent < 0) THEN       IF (base == 1) THEN          Intexp = 1       ELSE          Intexp = 0       END IF       RETURN    END IF    Intexp = 1    DO i = 1, exponent      Intexp = Intexp * base    END DO  END FUNCTION IntExp   FUNCTION Realexp (base, exponent)    REAL :: Realexp    REAL, INTENT(IN) :: base    INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: exponent    INTEGER :: i     Realexp = 1.0    IF (exponent < 0) THEN       DO i = exponent, -1          Realexp = Realexp / base       END DO    ELSE         DO i = 1, exponent          Realexp = Realexp * base       END DO    END IF  END FUNCTION RealExpEND MODULE Exp_Mod PROGRAM EXAMPLEUSE Exp_Mod  WRITE(*,*) 2.pow.30, 2.0.pow.30END PROGRAM EXAMPLE`
Output:
```  1073741824    1.073742E+09
```

## FreeBASIC

`' FB 1.05.0 ' Note that 'base' is a keyword in FB, so we use 'base_' instead as a parameter Function Pow Overload (base_ As Double, exponent As Integer) As Double  If exponent = 0.0 Then Return 1.0  If exponent = 1.0 Then Return base_  If exponent < 0.0 Then Return 1.0 / Pow(base_, -exponent)  Dim power As Double = base_  For i As Integer = 2 To exponent     power *= base_  Next  Return powerEnd Function Function Pow Overload(base_ As Integer, exponent As Integer) As Double   Return Pow(CDbl(base_), exponent)End Function ' check results of these functions using FB's built in '^' operatorPrint "Pow(2, 2)       = "; Pow(2, 2)Print "Pow(2.5, 2)     = "; Pow(2.5, 2)Print "Pow(2, -3)      = "; Pow(2, -3) Print "Pow(1.78, 3)    = "; Pow(1.78, 3)PrintPrint "2 ^ 2           = "; 2 ^ 2Print "2.5 ^ 2         = "; 2.5 ^ 2Print "2 ^ -3          = "; 2 ^ -3 Print "1.78 ^ 3        = "; 1.78 ^ 3PrintPrint "Press any key to quit"Sleep`
Output:
```Pow(2, 2)       =  4
Pow(2.5, 2)     =  6.25
Pow(2, -3)      =  0.125
Pow(1.78, 3)    =  5.639752000000001

2 ^ 2           =  4
2.5 ^ 2         =  6.25
2 ^ -3          =  0.125
1.78 ^ 3        =  5.639752000000001
```

## GAP

`expon := function(a, n, one, mul)	local p;	p := one;	while n > 0 do		if IsOddInt(n) then			p := mul(a, p);		fi;		a := mul(a, a);		n := QuoInt(n, 2);	od;	return p;end; expon(2, 10, 1, \*);# 1024 # a more creative use of exponentiationList([0 .. 31], n -> (1 - expon(0, n, 1, \-))/2);# [ 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0,#   1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1 ]`

## Go

Go doesn't support operator defintion. Other notes: While I left the integer algorithm simple, I used the shift and square trick for the float algorithm, just to show an alternative.

`package main import (    "errors"    "fmt") func expI(b, p int) (int, error) {    if p < 0 {        return 0, errors.New("negative power not allowed")    }    r := 1    for i := 1; i <= p; i++ {        r *= b    }    return r, nil} func expF(b float32, p int) float32 {    var neg bool    if p < 0 {        neg = true        p = -p    }    r := float32(1)    for pow := b; p > 0; pow *= pow {        if p&1 == 1 {            r *= pow        }        p >>= 1    }    if neg {        r = 1 / r    }    return r} func main() {    ti := func(b, p int) {        fmt.Printf("%d^%d: ", b, p)        e, err := expI(b, p)        if err != nil {            fmt.Println(err)        } else {            fmt.Println(e)        }    }     fmt.Println("expI tests")    ti(2, 10)    ti(2, -10)    ti(-2, 10)    ti(-2, 11)    ti(11, 0)     fmt.Println("overflow undetected")    ti(10, 10)     tf := func(b float32, p int) {        fmt.Printf("%g^%d: %g\n", b, p, expF(b, p))    }     fmt.Println("\nexpF tests:")    tf(2, 10)    tf(2, -10)    tf(-2, 10)    tf(-2, 11)    tf(11, 0)     fmt.Println("disallowed in expI, allowed here")    tf(0, -1)     fmt.Println("other interesting cases for 32 bit float type")    tf(10, 39)    tf(10, -39)    tf(-10, 39)}`
Output:
```expI tests
2^10: 1024
2^-10: negative power not allowed
-2^10: 1024
-2^11: -2048
11^0: 1
overflow undetected
10^10: 1410065408

expF tests:
2^10: 1024
2^-10: 0.0009765625
-2^10: 1024
-2^11: -2048
11^0: 1
disallowed in expI, allowed here
0^-1: +Inf
other interesting cases for 32 bit float type
10^39: +Inf
10^-39: 0
-10^39: -Inf
```

Here's the exponentiation operator from the Prelude:

`(^) :: (Num a, Integral b) => a -> b -> a_ ^ 0           =  1x ^ n | n > 0   =  f x (n-1) x where  f _ 0 y = y  f a d y = g a d  where    g b i | even i  = g (b*b) (i `quot` 2)          | otherwise = f b (i-1) (b*y)_ ^ _           = error "Prelude.^: negative exponent"`

There's no difference in Haskell between a procedure (or function) and an operator, other than the infix notation. This routine is overloaded for any integral exponent (which includes the arbitrarily large Integer type) and any numeric type for the bases (including, for example, Complex). It uses the fast "binary" exponentiation algorithm. For a negative exponent, the type of the base must support division (and hence reciprocals):

`(^^) :: (Fractional a, Integral b) => a -> b -> ax ^^ n = if n >= 0 then x^n else recip (x^(negate n))`

This rules out e.g. the integer types as base values in this case. Haskell also has a third exponentiation operator,

`(**) :: Floating a => a -> a -> ax ** y = exp (log x * y)`

which is used for floating point arithmetic.

## HicEst

`WRITE(Clipboard) pow(5,   3)  ! 125WRITE(ClipBoard) pow(5.5, 7)  ! 152243.5234 FUNCTION pow(x, n)   pow = 1   DO i = 1, n      pow = pow * x   ENDDOEND `

## Icon and Unicon

The procedure below will take an integer or real base and integer exponent and return base ^ exponent. If exponent is negative, base is coerced to real so as not to return 0. Operator overloading is not supported and this is not an efficient implementation.

`procedure main()bases := [5,5.]numbers := [0,2,2.,-1,3]every  write("expon(",b := !bases,", ",x := !numbers,")=",(expon(b,x) | "failed") \ 1)end procedure expon(base,power)local op,res base := numeric(base)            | runerror(102,base)power := power = integer(power)  | runerr(101,power) if power = 0 then return 1else op := if power < 1 then               (base := real(base)) & "/"   # force real base              else "*" res := 1every 1 to abs(power) do   res := op(res,base)return resend`

## J

J is concretely specified, which makes it easy to define primitives in terms of other primitives (this is especially true of mathematical primitives, given the language's mathematical emphasis).

So we have any number of options. Here's the simplest, equivalent to the `for each number, product = product * number` of other languages. The base may be any number, and the exponent may be any non-negative integer (including zero):

`   exp  =:  */@:#~     10 exp 31000    10 exp 01`

We can make this more general by allowing the exponent to be any integer (including negatives), at the cost of a slight increase in complexity:

`   exp  =:  *@:] %: */@:(#~|)    10 exp _30.001`

Or, we can define exponentiation as repeated multiplication (as opposed to multiplying a given number of copies of the base)

`   exp =: dyad def 'x *^:y 1'    10 exp 31000   10 exp _30.001`

Here, when we specify a negative number of repetitions, multiplication's inverse is used that many times.

J's calculus of functions permits us to define exponentiation in its full generality, as the inverse of log (i.e. exp = log-1):

` exp  =:  ^.^:_1  81 exp 0.5   9`

Note that the definition above does not use the primitive exponentiation function `^` . The carets in it represent different (but related) things . The function is composed of three parts: `^. ^: _1` . The first part, `^.`, is the primitive logarithm operator (e.g. `3 = 10^.1000`) .

The second part, `^:` , is interesting: it is a "meta operator". It takes two arguments: a function `f` on its left, and a number `N` on its right. It produces a new function, which, when given an argument, applies `f` to that argument `N` times. For example, if we had a function `increment`, then `increment^:3 X` would increment `X` three times, so the result would be `X+3`.

In the case of `^. ^: _1 `, `f` is `^.` (i.e. logarithm) and `N` is -1. Therefore we apply log negative one times or the inverse of log once (precisely as in log-1).

Similarly, we can define exponentiation as the reverse of the inverse of root. That is, x pow y = y root-1 x:

` exp  =:  %:^:_1~  81 exp 0.59`

Compare this with the previous definition: it is the same, except that `%:` , root, has been substituted for `^.` , logarithm, and the arguments have been reversed (or reflected) with `~`.

That is, J is telling us that power is the same as the reflex of the inverse of root, exactly as we'd expect.

One last note: we said these definitions are the same as `^` in its full generality. What is meant by that? Well, in the context of this puzzle, it means both the base and exponent may be any real number. But J goes further than that: it also permits complex numbers.

Let's use Euler's famous formula, epi*i = -1 as an example:

`   pi =: 3.14159265358979323846   e  =: 2.71828182845904523536   i  =: 2 %: _1                  NB.  Square root of -1    e^(pi*i)_1`

And, as stated, our redefinition is equivalent:

`   exp =: %:^:_1~    e exp (pi*i)_1`

## Java

Java does not support operator definition. This example is unoptimized, but will handle negative exponents as well. It is unnecessary to show intint since an int in Java will be cast as a double.

`public class Exp{   public static void main(String[] args){      System.out.println(pow(2,30));      System.out.println(pow(2.0,30)); //tests      System.out.println(pow(2.0,-2));   }    public static double pow(double base, int exp){      if(exp < 0) return 1 / pow(base, -exp);      double ans = 1.0;      for(;exp > 0;--exp) ans *= base;      return ans;   }}`
Output:
``` 1.073741824E9
1.073741824E9
0.25
```

## JavaScript

`function pow(base, exp) {    if (exp != Math.floor(exp))         throw "exponent must be an integer";    if (exp < 0)         return 1 / pow(base, -exp);    var ans = 1;    while (exp > 0) {        ans *= base;        exp--;    }    return ans;}`

## jq

`# 0^0 => 1# NOTE: jq converts very large integers to floats.# This implementation uses reduce to avoid deep recursiondef power_int(n):  if n == 0 then 1  elif . == 0 then 0  elif n < 0 then 1/power_int(-n)  elif ((n | floor) == n) then       ( (n % 2) | if . == 0 then 1 else -1 end ) as \$sign       | if (. == -1) then \$sign         elif . < 0 then (( -(.) | power_int(n) ) * \$sign)         else . as \$in | reduce range(1;n) as \$i (\$in; . * \$in)         end  else error("This is a toy implementation that requires n be integral")  end ;`
Demonstration:
`def demo(x;y):  x | [ power_int(y), (log*y|exp) ] ; demo(2; 3),demo(2; 64),demo(1.1; 1024),demo(1.1; -1024) # Output:[8,                      7.999999999999998][18446744073709552000,   18446744073709525000][2.4328178969536854e+42, 2.4328178969536693e+42][4.1104597317052596e-43, 4.1104597317052874e-43] `

## Kotlin

Kotlin does not have a dedicated exponentiation operator (we would normally use Java's Math.pow method instead) but it's possible to implement integer and floating power exponentiation (with integer exponents) using infix extension functions which look like non-symbolic operators for these actions:

`// version 1.0.6 infix fun Int.ipow(exp: Int): Int =     when {        this ==  1 -> 1        this == -1 -> if (exp % 2 == 0) 1 else -1         exp <  0   -> throw IllegalArgumentException("invalid exponent")        exp == 0   -> 1        else       -> {            var ans = 1            var base = this            var e = exp            while (e > 0) {                if (e and 1 == 1) ans *= base                e = e shr 1                base *= base            }            ans        }    } infix fun Double.dpow(exp: Int): Double {    var ans = 1.0    var e   = exp     var base = if (e < 0) 1.0 / this else this    if (e < 0) e = -e    while (e > 0) {        if (e and 1 == 1) ans *= base        e = e shr 1        base *= base    }    return ans} fun main(args: Array<String>) {    println("2  ^ 3   = \${2 ipow 3}")    println("1  ^ -10 = \${1 ipow -10}")    println("-1 ^ -3  = \${-1 ipow -3}")    println()    println("2.0 ^ -3 = \${2.0 dpow -3}")    println("1.5 ^ 0  = \${1.5 dpow 0}")    println("4.5 ^ 2  = \${4.5 dpow 2}")}`
Output:
```2  ^ 3   = 8
1  ^ -10 = 1
-1 ^ -3  = -1

2.0 ^ -3 = 0.125
1.5 ^ 0  = 1.0
4.5 ^ 2  = 20.25
```

## Liberty BASIC

`   print " 11^5     = ", floatPow(  11,       5  )  print " (-11)^5  = ", floatPow( -11,       5  )  print " 11^( -5) = ", floatPow(  11,      -5  )  print " 3.1416^3 = ", floatPow(   3.1416,  3  )  print " 0^2      = ", floatPow(   0,       2  )  print "  2^0     = ", floatPow(   2,       0  )  print " -2^0     = ", floatPow(  -2,       0  )   end   function floatPow( a, b)      if a <>0 then          m =1          if b =abs( b) then              for n =1 to b                  m =m *a              next n          else              m =1 /floatPow( a, 0 - b)  ' LB has no unitary minus operator.          end if      else          m =0      end if      floatPow =m  end function `

## Lingo

Lingo doesn't support user-defined operators.

`-- As for built-in power() function: -- base can be either integer or float; returns float.on pow (base, exp)  if exp=0 then return 1.0  else if exp<0 then    exp = -exp    base = 1.0/base  end if  res = float(base)  repeat with i = 2 to exp    res = res*base  end repeat  return resend`

## Logo

`to int_power :n :m  if equal? 0 :m [output 1]  if equal? 0 modulo :m 2 [output int_power :n*:n :m/2]  output :n * int_power :n :m-1end`

## Lua

All numbers in Lua are floating point numbers (thus, there are no real integers). Operator overloading is supported for tables only.

`number = {} function number.pow( a, b )    local ret = 1    if b >= 0 then        for i = 1, b do            ret = ret * a.val        end    else        for i = b, -1 do            ret = ret / a.val        end    end        return retend function number.New( v )    local num = { val = v }    local mt = { __pow = number.pow }    setmetatable( num, mt )    return numend x = number.New( 5 )    print( x^2 )                   --> 25print( number.pow( x, -4 ) )   --> 0.016`

## Lucid

`pow(n,x)   k = n fby k div 2;   p = x fby p*p;   y =1 fby if even(k) then y else y*p;   result y asa k eq 0;end`

## M4

M4 lacks floating point computation and operator definition.

`define(`power',`ifelse(\$2,0,1,`eval(\$1*\$0(\$1,decr(\$2)))')')power(2,10)`
Output:
```1024
```

## Mathematica / Wolfram Language

Define a function and an infix operator \[CirclePlus] with the same definition:

`exponentiation[x_,y_Integer]:=Which[y>0,Times@@ConstantArray[x,y],y==0,1,y<0,1/exponentiation[x,-y]]CirclePlus[x_,y_Integer]:=exponentiation[x,y]`

Examples:

`exponentiation[1.23,3]exponentiation[4,0]exponentiation[2.5,-2]1.23\[CirclePlus]34\[CirclePlus]02.5\[CirclePlus]-2`

gives back:

`1.8608710.161.8608710.16`

Note that \[CirclePlus] shows up as a special character in Mathematica namely a circle divided in 4 pieces. Note also that this function supports negative and positive exponents.

## Maxima

`"^^^"(a, n) := block(   [p: 1],   while n > 0 do (      if oddp(n) then p: p * a,      a: a * a,      n: quotient(n, 2)   ),   p)\$ infix("^^^")\$ 2 ^^^ 10;1024 2.5 ^^^ 10;9536.7431640625`

## МК-61/52

`С/П	x^y	С/П`

## Modula-2

Whilst some implementations or dialects of Modula-2 may permit definition or overloading of operators, neither is permitted in N.Wirth's classic language definition and the ISO Modula-2 standard. The operations are therefore given as library functions.

` (* Library Interface *)DEFINITION MODULE Exponentiation; PROCEDURE IntExp(base, exp : INTEGER) : INTEGER; (* Raises base to the power of exp and returns the result    both base and exp must be of type INTEGER *) PROCEDURE RealExp(base : REAL; exp : INTEGER) : REAL; (* Raises base to the power of exp and returns the result    base must be of type REAL, exp of type INTEGER *) END Exponentiation. (* Library Implementation *)IMPLEMENTATION MODULE Exponentiation; PROCEDURE IntExp(base, exp : INTEGER) : INTEGER;  VAR    i, res : INTEGER;  BEGIN    res := 1;    FOR i := 1 TO exp DO      res := res * base;    END;    RETURN res;  END IntExp; PROCEDURE RealExp(base: REAL; exp: INTEGER) : REAL;  VAR    i : INTEGER;    res : REAL;  BEGIN    res := 1.0;    IF exp < 0 THEN      FOR i := exp TO -1 DO        res := res / base;      END;    ELSE (* exp >= 0 *)      FOR i := 1 TO exp DO        res := res * base;      END;    END;    RETURN res;  END RealExp; END Exponentiation. `

## Modula-3

`MODULE Expt EXPORTS Main; IMPORT IO, Fmt; PROCEDURE IntExpt(arg, exp: INTEGER): INTEGER =  VAR result := 1;  BEGIN    FOR i := 1 TO exp DO      result := result * arg;    END;    RETURN result;  END IntExpt; PROCEDURE RealExpt(arg: REAL; exp: INTEGER): REAL =  VAR result := 1.0;  BEGIN    IF exp < 0 THEN      FOR i := exp TO -1 DO        result := result / arg;      END;    ELSE      FOR i := 1 TO exp DO        result := result * arg;      END;    END;    RETURN result;  END RealExpt; BEGIN  IO.Put("2 ^ 4 = " & Fmt.Int(IntExpt(2, 4)) & "\n");  IO.Put("2.5 ^ 4 = " & Fmt.Real(RealExpt(2.5, 4)) & "\n");END Expt.`
Output:
```2 ^ 4 = 16
2.5 ^ 4 = 39.0625
```

## Nemerle

Macros can be used to define a new operator:

`using System; macro @^ (val, pow : int){    <[ Math.Pow(\$val, \$pow) ]>}`

The file with the macro needs to be compiled as a library, and the resulting assembly must be referenced when compiling source files which use the operator.

`using System;using System.Console;using Nemerle.Assertions; module Expon{    Expon(val : int, pow : int) : int            // demonstrates simple/naive method      requires pow > 0 otherwise throw ArgumentOutOfRangeException("Negative powers not allowed, will not return int.")    {        mutable result = 1;        repeat(pow) {            result *= val        }        result    }     Expon(val : double, pow : int) : double     // demonstrates shift and square method    {        mutable neg = false;        mutable p = pow;        when (pow < 0) {neg = true; p = -pow};        mutable v = val;        mutable result = 1d;         while (p > 0) {            when (p & 1 == 1) result *= v;            v *= v;            p >>= 1;        }        if (neg) 1d/result else result    }     Main() : void    {        def eight = 2^3;        // def oops = 2^1.5; // compilation error as operator is defined for integer exponentiation        def four = Expon(2, 2);        def four_d = Expon(2.0, 2);         WriteLine(\$"\$eight, \$four, \$four_d");    }}`

## Nim

`proc `^`[T: float|int](base: T; exp: int): T =  var (base, exp) = (base, exp)  result = 1   if exp < 0:    when T is int:      if base * base != 1: return 0      elif (exp and 1) == 0: return 1      else: return base    else:      base = 1.0 / base      exp = -exp   while exp != 0:    if (exp and 1) != 0:      result *= base    exp = exp shr 1    base *= base echo "2^6 = ", 2^6echo "2^-6 = ", 2 ^ -6echo "2.71^6 = ", 2.71^6echo "2.71^-6 = ", 2.71 ^ -6`

## Objeck

`class Exp {  function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil {    Pow(2,30)->PrintLine();    Pow(2.0,30)->PrintLine();    Pow(2.0,-2)->PrintLine();   }   function : native : Pow(base : Float, exp : Int) ~ Float {    if(exp < 0) {      return 1 / base->Power(exp * -1.0);    };     ans := 1.0;    while(exp > 0) {      ans *= base;      exp -= 1;    };     return ans;  }}`
```1.07374182e+009
1.07374182e+009
0.25```

## OCaml

It is possible to create a generic exponential. For this, one must know the multiplication function, and the unit value. Here, the usual fast algorithm is used:

`let pow one mul a n =  let rec g p x = function  | 0 -> x  | i ->      g (mul p p) (if i mod 2 = 1 then mul p x else x) (i/2)  in  g a one n;; pow 1 ( * ) 2 16;;  (* 65536 *)pow 1.0 ( *. ) 2.0 16;; (* 65536. *) (* pow is not limited to exponentiation *)pow 0 ( + ) 2 16;;  (* 32 *)pow "" ( ^ ) "abc " 10;;  (* "abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc abc " *)pow [ ] ( @ ) [ 1; 2 ] 10;;  (* [1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1; 2] *) (* Thue-Morse sequence *)Array.init 32 (fun n -> (1 - pow 1 ( - ) 0 n) lsr 1);; (* [|0; 1; 1; 0; 1; 0; 0; 1; 1; 0; 0; 1; 0; 1; 1; 0;     1; 0; 0; 1; 0; 1; 1; 0; 0; 1; 1; 0; 1; 0; 0; 1|] See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thue-Morse_sequence*)`

## Oforth

This function works either for int or floats :

`: powint(r, n) | i |    1 n abs loop: i [ r * ]   n isNegative ifTrue: [ inv ] ; 2 3 powint println2 powint(3) println1.2 4 powint println1.2 powint(4) println`
Output:
```8
8
2.0736
2.0736
```

## PARI/GP

This version works for integer and floating-point bases (as well as intmod bases, ...).

`ex(a, b)={  my(c = 1);  while(b > 1,    if(b % 2, c *= a);    a = a^2;    b >>= 1  );  a * c};`

PARI/GP also has a built-in operator that works for any type of numerical exponent:

`ex2(a, b) = a ^ b;`

## Pascal

`Program ExponentiationOperator(output); function intexp (base, exponent: integer): longint;  var    i: integer;   begin    if (exponent < 0) then      if (base = 1) then        intexp := 1      else        intexp := 0    else    begin      intexp := 1;      for i := 1 to exponent do        intexp := intexp * base;    end;  end; function realexp (base: real; exponent: integer): real;  var    i: integer;   begin    realexp := 1.0;    if (exponent < 0) then      for i := exponent to -1 do        realexp := realexp / base    else       for i := 1 to exponent do        realexp := realexp * base;  end; begin  writeln('2^30: ', intexp(2, 30));  writeln('2.0^30: ', realexp(2.0, 30));end.`
Output:
```% ./ExponentiationOperator
2^30: 1073741824
2.0^30:  1.07374182400000E+009```

Pascal functions can be overloaded. This means that the two functions can have the same name and the particular function executed will depend on the data types of the arguments.

```Program ExponentiationOperator(output);

function newpower (base, exponent: integer): longint;
var
i: integer;

begin
if (exponent < 0) then
if (base = 1) then
newpower := 1
else
newpower := 0
else
begin
newpower := 1;
for i := 1 to exponent do
newpower := newpower * base;
end;
end;

function newpower (base: real; exponent: integer): real;
var
i: integer;

begin
newpower := 1.0;
if (exponent < 0) then
for i := exponent to -1 do
newpower := newpower / base
else
for i := 1 to exponent do
newpower := newpower * base;
end;

begin
writeln('2^30: ', newpower(2, 30));
writeln('2.0^30: ', newpower(2.0, 30));
end.
```

Output is as before.

## Perl

`#!/usr/bin/perl -w use strict ; sub expon {   my ( \$base , \$expo ) = @_ ;   if ( \$expo == 0 ) {      return 1 ;   }   elsif ( \$expo == 1 ) {      return \$base ;   }   elsif ( \$expo > 1 ) {      my \$prod = 1 ;      foreach my \$n ( 0..(\$expo - 1) ) {	 \$prod *= \$base ;      }      return \$prod ;   }   elsif ( \$expo < 0 ) {      return 1 / ( expon ( \$base , -\$expo ) ) ;   }}print "3 to the power of 10 as a function is " . expon( 3 , 10 ) . " !\n" ;print "3 to the power of 10 as a builtin is " . 3**10 . " !\n" ;print "5.5 to the power of -3 as a function is " . expon( 5.5 , -3 ) . " !\n" ;print "5.5 to the power of -3 as a builtin is " . 5.5**-3 . " !\n" ; `
Output:
```3 to the power of 10 as a function is 59049 !
3 to the power of 10 as a builtin is 59049 !
5.5 to the power of -3 as a function is 0.00601051840721262 !
5.5 to the power of -3 as a builtin is 0.00601051840721262 !
```

The following version is simpler and much faster for large exponents, since it uses exponentiation by squaring.

`sub ex {  my(\$base,\$exp) = @_;  die "Exponent '\$exp' must be an integer!" if \$exp != int(\$exp);  return 1 if \$exp == 0;  (\$base, \$exp) = (1/\$base, -\$exp)  if \$exp < 0;  my \$c = 1;  while (\$exp > 1) {    \$c *= \$base if \$exp % 2;    \$base *= \$base;    \$exp >>= 1;  }  \$base * \$c;}`

## Perl 6

Works with: Rakudo version #22 "Thousand Oaks"
`subset Natural of Int where { \$^n >= 0 } multi pow (0,     0)            { fail '0**0 is undefined' }multi pow (\$base, Natural \$exp) { [*] \$base xx \$exp }multi pow (\$base, Int \$exp)     { 1 / pow \$base, -\$exp } sub infix:<***> (\$a, \$b) { pow \$a, \$b }`

Examples of use:

`say pow .75, -5;say .75 *** -5;`

## Phix

The builtin power function handles atoms and integers for both arguments, whereas this deliberately restricts the exponent to an integer.
There is no operator overloading in Phix, or for that matter any builtin overriding.

`function powi(atom b, integer i)atom v=1    b = iff(i<0 ? 1/b : b)    i = abs(i)    while i>0 do        if and_bits(i,1) then v *= b end if        b *= b        i = floor(i/2)    end while    return vend function?powi(-3,-5)?power(-3,-5)`
Output:
```-0.004115226337
-0.004115226337
```

## PicoLisp

This uses Knuth's algorithm (The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2, page 442)

`(de ** (X N)  # N th power of X   (if (ge0 N)      (let Y 1         (loop            (when (bit? 1 N)               (setq Y (* Y X)) )            (T (=0 (setq N (>> 1 N)))               Y )            (setq X (* X X)) ) )      0 ) )`

## PL/I

`declare exp generic  (iexp when (fixed, fixed),   fexp when (float, fixed) );iexp: procedure (m, n) returns (fixed binary (31));   declare (m, n) fixed binary (31) nonassignable;   declare exp fixed binary (31) initial (m), i fixed binary;   if m = 0 & n = 0 then signal error;   if n = 0 then return (1);   do i = 2 to n;      exp = exp * m;   end;   return (exp);end iexp;fexp: procedure (a, n) returns (float (15));   declare (a float, n fixed binary (31)) nonassignable;   declare exp float initial (a), i fixed binary;   if a = 0 & n = 0 then signal error;   if n = 0 then return (1);   do i = 2 to n;      exp = exp * a;   end;   return (exp);end fexp;`

## PowerShell

`function pow(\$a, [int]\$b) {    if (\$b -eq -1) { return 1/\$a }    if (\$b -eq 0)  { return 1 }    if (\$b -eq 1)  { return \$a }    if (\$b -lt 0) {        \$rec = \$true # reciprocal needed        \$b = -\$b    }     \$result = \$a    2..\$b | ForEach-Object {        \$result *= \$a    }     if (\$rec) {        return 1/\$result    } else {        return \$result    }}`

The function works for both integers and floating-point values as first argument.

Output:
```PS> pow 2 15
32768
PS> pow 2.71 -4
0,018540559532257
PS> pow (-1.35) 3
−2,460375```

The negative first argument needs to be put in parentheses because it would otherwise be passed as string. This can be circumvented by declaring the first argument to the function as `double`, but then the return type would be always double while currently `pow 2 3` returns an `int`.

## PureBasic

PureBasic does not allow an operator to be redefined or operator overloading.

`Procedure powI(base, exponent)  Protected i, result.d  If exponent < 0    If base = 1      result = 1    EndIf    ProcedureReturn result  EndIf  result = 1  For i = 1 To exponent    result * base  Next  ProcedureReturn resultEndProcedure Procedure.f powF(base.f, exponent)  Protected i, magExponent = Abs(exponent), result.d  If base <> 0    result = 1.0    If exponent <> 0       For i = 1 To magExponent        result * base      Next      If exponent < 0         result = 1.0 / result      EndIf    EndIf   EndIf  ProcedureReturn resultEndProcedure If OpenConsole()  Define x, a.f, exp   x = Random(10) - 5  a = Random(10000) / 10000 * 10  For exp = -3 To 3    PrintN(Str(x) + " ^ " + Str(exp) + " = " + Str(powI(x, exp)))    PrintN(StrF(a) + " ^ " + Str(exp) + " = " + StrF(powF(a, exp)))    PrintN("--------------")  Next    Print(#CRLF\$ + #CRLF\$ + "Press ENTER to exit")  Input()  CloseConsole()EndIf`
Output:
```-3 ^ -3 = 0
6.997000 ^ -3 = 0.002919
--------------
-3 ^ -2 = 0
6.997000 ^ -2 = 0.020426
--------------
-3 ^ -1 = 0
6.997000 ^ -1 = 0.142918
--------------
-3 ^ 0 = 1
6.997000 ^ 0 = 1.000000
--------------
-3 ^ 1 = -3
6.997000 ^ 1 = 6.997000
--------------
-3 ^ 2 = 9
6.997000 ^ 2 = 48.958012
--------------
-3 ^ 3 = -27
6.997000 ^ 3 = 342.559235
-------------```

## Prolog

Works with: SWI-Prolog version 6

### Declaring an Operator as an Arithmetic Function

In Prolog, we define predicates rather than functions. Still, functions and predicates are related: going one way, we can think of an n-place predicate as a function from its arguments to a member of the set `{true, false}`; going the other way, we can think of functions as predicates with a hidden ultimate argument, called a "return value". Following the latter approach, Prolog sometimes uses macro expansion to provide functional syntax by

1. catching terms fitting a certain pattern (viz. `Base ^^ Exp`, which is the same as `'^^'(N, 3)`),

2. calling the term with an extra argument (viz. `call('^^'(Base, Exp), Power)`),

3. replacing the occurrence of the term with the value instantiated in the extra argument (viz. Power).

The predicate `is/2` supports functional syntax in its second argument: e.g., `X is sqrt(2) + 1`. New arithmetic functions can be added with the `arithmetic_function/1` directive, wherein the arity attributed to the function is one less than the arity of the predicate which will be called during term expansion and evaluation. The following directives establish `^^/2` as, first, an arithmetic function, and then as a right-associative binary operator (so that `X is 2^^2^^2` == X = 2^(2^2)</code>):

`:- arithmetic_function((^^)/2).:- op(200, xfy, user:(^^)).`

When `^^/2` occurs in an expression in the second argument of `is/2`, Prolog calls the subsequently defined predicate `^^/3`, and obtains the operators replacement value from the predicate's third argument.

### Higher-order Predicate:

This solution employs the higher-order predicate `foldl/4` from the standard SWI-Prolog `library(apply)`, in conjunction with an auxiliary "folding predicate" (note, the definition uses the `^^` operator as an arithmetic function):

`%% ^^/3%%   True if Power is Base ^ Exp. ^^(Base, Exp, Power) :-    ( Exp < 0   ->  Power is 1 / (Base ^^ (Exp * -1))            % If exponent is negative, then ...     ; Exp > 0   ->  length(Powers, Exp),                         % If exponent is positive, then                    foldl( exp_folder(Base), Powers, 1, Power )  %    Powers is a list of free variables with length Exp                                                                 %    and Power is Powers folded with exp_folder/4     ; Power = 1                                                  % otherwise Exp must be 0, so    ). %% exp_folder/4%%       True when Power is the product of Base and Powers.%       %       This predicate is designed to work with foldl and a list of free variables.%       It passes the result of each evaluation to the next application through its%       fourth argument, instantiating the elements of Powers to each successive Power of the Base. exp_folder(Base, Power, Powers, Power) :-    Power is Base * Powers.`

Example usage:

`?- X is 2 ^^ 3.X = 8. ?- X is 2 ^^ -3.X = 0.125. ?- X is 2.5 ^^ -3.X = 0.064. ?- X is 2.5 ^^ 3.X = 15.625.`

### Recursive Predicate

An implementation of exponentiation using recursion and no control predicates.

`exp_recursive(Base, NegExp, NegPower) :-    NegExp < 0,    Exp is NegExp * -1,    exp_recursive_(Base, Exp, Base, Power),    NegPower is 1 / Power.exp_recursive(Base, Exp, Power) :-    Exp > 0,    exp_recursive_(Base, Exp, Base, Power).exp_recursive(_, 0, 1). exp_recursive_(_,    1,   Power, Power).exp_recursive_(Base, Exp, Acc,   Power)   :-    Exp > 1,    NewAcc is Base * Acc,    NewExp is Exp  - 1,    exp_recursive_(Base, NewExp, NewAcc, Power).`

## Python

`MULTIPLY = lambda x, y: x*y class num(float):    # the following method has complexity O(b)    # rather than O(log b) via the rapid exponentiation    def __pow__(self, b):        return reduce(MULTIPLY, [self]*b, 1) # works with ints as function or operatorprint num(2).__pow__(3)print num(2) ** 3 # works with floats as function or operatorprint num(2.3).__pow__(8)print num(2.3) ** 8`

## R

`# Methodpow <- function(x, y) {   x <- as.numeric(x)   y <- as.integer(y)      prod(rep(x, y))}#Operator"%pow%" <- function(x,y) pow(x,y) pow(3, 4)    # 812.5 %pow% 2  # 6.25`

## Racket

`#lang racket(define (^ base expt)  (for/fold ((acum 1))    ((i (in-range expt)))    (* acum base))) (^ 5 2) ; 25(^ 5.0 2) ; 25.0`

## Retro

Retro has no floating point support in the standard VM.

From the math' vocabulary:

`: pow  ( bp-n ) 1 swap [ over * ] times nip ;`

And in use:

`2 5 ^math'pow`

The fast exponentiation algorithm can be coded as follows:

`: pow ( n m -- n^m )1 2rot[ dup 1 and 0 <>  [ [ tuck * swap ] dip ] ifTrue  [ dup * ] dip 1 >> dup 0 <>] whiledrop drop ;`

## REXX

The   iPow   function doesn't care what kind of number is to be raised to a power,
it can be an integer or floating point number.

Extra error checking was added to verify that the invocation is syntactically correct.

`/*REXX program  computes and displays  various   (integer)   exponentiations.           */                                                 say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say '17**65   is:'say  17**65say numeric digits 100;                              say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say '17**65   is:'say  17**65say numeric digits 10;                               say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say '2 ** -10   is:'say  2 ** -10say numeric digits 30;                               say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say '-3.1415926535897932384626433 ** 3  is:'say  -3.1415926535897932384626433 ** 3say numeric digits 1000;                             say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say '2 ** 1000   is:'say  2 ** 1000say numeric digits 60;                               say center('digits='digits(), 79, "─")say 'iPow(5, 70)  is:'say  iPow(5, 70)exit                                             /*stick a fork in it,  we're all done. *//*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/errMsg: say;     say '***error***';     say;     say arg(1);     say;     say;     exit 13/*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/iPow:   procedure;  parse arg x 1 _,p        if arg()<2           then call errMsg  "not enough arguments specified"        if arg()>2           then call errMsg  "too many arguments specified"        if \datatype(x,'N')  then call errMsg  "1st arg isn't numeric:"         x        if \datatype(p,'W')  then call errMsg  "2nd arg isn't an integer:"      p        if p=0               then return 1                do abs(p) - 1;    _=_*x;    end  /*abs(p)-1*/        if p<0               then _=1/_        return _`
output
```───────────────────────────────────digits=9────────────────────────────────────
17**65   is:
9.53190909E+79

──────────────────────────────────digits=100───────────────────────────────────
17**65   is:
95319090450218007303742536355848761234066170796000792973413605849481890760893457

───────────────────────────────────digits=10───────────────────────────────────
2 ** -10   is:
0.0009765625

───────────────────────────────────digits=30───────────────────────────────────
-3.1415926535897932384626433 ** 3  is:
-31.0062766802998201754763126013

──────────────────────────────────digits=1000──────────────────────────────────
2 ** 1000   is:
10715086071862673209484250490600018105614048117055336074437503883703510511249361224931983788156958581275946729175531468251871452856923140435984577574698574803934567774824230985421074605062371141877954182153046474983581941267398767559165543946077062914571196477686542167660429831652624386837205668069376

───────────────────────────────────digits=60───────────────────────────────────
ipow(5,70)  is:
8470329472543003390683225006796419620513916015625
```

## Ring

` see "11^5 = " + ipow(11, 5) + nlsee "pi^3 = " + fpow(3.14, 3) + nl func ipow a, b     p2 = 1     for i = 1 to 32         p2 *= p2         if b < 0  p2 *= a ok         b = b << 1     next     return p2 func fpow a, b     p = 1     for i = 1 to 32         p *= p         if b < 0  p *= a ok         b = b << 1     next     return p `

Output :

```11^5 = 161051
pi^3 = 30.96
```

## Ruby

We add a pow method to Numeric objects. To calculate 5.pow 3, this method fills an array [5, 5, 5] and then multiplies together the elements.

`class Numeric  def pow(m)    raise TypeError, "exponent must be an integer: #{m}" unless m.is_a? Integer    puts "pow!!"    Array.new(m, self).reduce(1, :*)  endend p 5.pow(3)p 5.5.pow(3)p 5.pow(3.1)`
Output:
```pow!!
125
pow!!
166.375
pow.rb:3:in `pow': exponent must be an integer: 3.1 (TypeError)
from pow.rb:16:in `<main>'```

To overload the ** exponentiation operator, this might work, but doesn't:

`class Numeric  def **(m)    pow(m)  endend`

It doesn't work because the ** method is defined independently for Numeric subclasses Fixnum, Bignum and Float. One must:

`class Fixnum  def **(m)    print "Fixnum "    pow(m)  endendclass Bignum  def **(m)    print "Bignum "    pow(m)  endendclass Float  def **(m)    print "Float "    pow(m)  endend p i=2**64p i ** 2p 2.2 ** 3`
Output:
```Fixnum pow!!
18446744073709551616
Bignum pow!!
340282366920938463463374607431768211456
Float pow!!
10.648```

## Run BASIC

`print " 11^5     = ";11^5print " (-11)^5  = ";-11^5print " 11^( -5) = ";11^-5print " 3.1416^3 = ";3.1416^3print " 0^2      = ";0^2print "  2^0     = ";2^0print " -2^0     = ";-2^0`
Output:
``` 11^5     = 161051
(-11)^5  = -161051
11^( -5) = 6.20921325e-6
3.1416^3 = 31.0064942
0^2      = 0
2^0     = 1
-2^0     = 1```

## Rust

The `num` crate is the de-facto Rust library for numerical generics and it provides the `One` trait which allows for an exponentiation function that is generic over both integral and floating point types. The library provides this generic exponentiation function, the implementation of which is the `pow` function below.

`extern crate num;use num::traits::One;use std::ops::Mul; fn pow<T>(mut base: T, mut exp: usize) -> T     where T: Clone + One + Mul<T, Output=T>{    if exp == 0 { return T::one() }    while exp & 1 == 0 {        base = base.clone() * base;        exp >>= 1;    }    if exp == 1 { return base }    let mut acc = base.clone();     while exp > 1 {        exp >>= 1;        base = base.clone() * base;        if exp & 1 == 1 {            acc = acc * base.clone();        }    }    acc}`

## Scala

 This example is in need of improvement.
Works with: Scala version 2.8

There's no distinction between an operator and a method in Scala. Alas, there is no way of adding methods to a class, but one can make it look like a method has been added, through a method commonly known as Pimp My Library. Therefore, we show below how that can beaccomplished. We define the operator ↑ (unicode's uparrow), which is written as \u2191 below, to make cut & paste easier.

To use it, one has to import the implicit from the appropriate object. ExponentI will work for any integral type (Int, BigInt, etc), ExponentF will work for any fractional type (Double, BigDecimal, etc). Importing both at the same time won't work. In this case, it might be better to define implicits for the actual types being used, such as was done in Exponents.

`object Exponentiation {  import scala.annotation.tailrec   @tailrec def powI[N](n: N, exponent: Int)(implicit num: Integral[N]): N = {    import num._    exponent match {      case 0 => one      case _ if exponent % 2 == 0 => powI((n * n), (exponent / 2))      case _ => powI(n, (exponent - 1)) * n    }  }   @tailrec def powF[N](n: N, exponent: Int)(implicit num: Fractional[N]): N = {    import num._    exponent match {      case 0 => one      case _ if exponent < 0 => one / powF(n, exponent.abs)      case _ if exponent % 2 == 0 => powF((n * n), (exponent / 2))      case _ => powF(n, (exponent - 1)) * n    }  }   class ExponentI[N : Integral](n: N) {    def \u2191(exponent: Int): N = powI(n, exponent)  }   class ExponentF[N : Fractional](n: N) {    def \u2191(exponent: Int): N = powF(n, exponent)  }   object ExponentI {    implicit def toExponentI[N : Integral](n: N): ExponentI[N] = new ExponentI(n)  }   object ExponentF {    implicit def toExponentF[N : Fractional](n: N): ExponentF[N] = new ExponentF(n)  }   object Exponents {    implicit def toExponent(n: Int): ExponentI[Int] = new ExponentI(n)    implicit def toExponent(n: Double): ExponentF[Double] = new ExponentF(n)  }}`
Functions powI and powF above are not tail recursive, since the result of the recursive call is multiplied by n. A tail recursive version of powI would be:
`  @tailrec def powI[N](n: N, exponent: Int, acc:Int=1)(implicit num: Integral[N]): N = {    exponent match {      case 0 => acc      case _ if exponent % 2 == 0 => powI(n * n, exponent / 2, acc)      case _ => powI(n, (exponent - 1), acc*n)    }  }`

## Scheme

This definition of the exponentiation procedure `^` operates on bases of all numerical types that the multiplication procedure `*` operates on, i. e. integer, rational, real, and complex. The notion of an operator does not exist in Scheme. Application of a procedure to its arguments is always expressed with a prefix notation.

`(define (^ base exponent)  (define (*^ exponent acc)    (if (= exponent 0)        acc        (*^ (- exponent 1) (* acc base))))  (*^ exponent 1)) (display (^ 2 3))(newline)(display (^ (/ 1 2) 3))(newline)(display (^ 0.5 3))(newline)(display (^ 2+i 3))(newline)`
Output:
``` 8
1/8
0.125
2+11i
```

## Seed7

In Seed7 the ** operator is overloaded for both integerinteger and floatinteger (additionally there is a ** operator for floatfloat). The following re-implementation of both functions does not use another exponentiation function to do the computation. Instead the exponentiation-by-squaring algorithm is used.

`const func integer: intPow (in var integer: base, in var integer: exponent) is func  result    var integer: result is 0;  begin    if exponent < 0 then      raise(NUMERIC_ERROR);    else      if odd(exponent) then        result := base;      else        result := 1;      end if;      exponent := exponent div 2;      while exponent <> 0 do        base *:= base;        if odd(exponent) then          result *:= base;        end if;        exponent := exponent div 2;      end while;    end if;  end func;`

Original source: [1]

`const func float: fltIPow (in var float: base, in var integer: exponent) is func  result    var float: power is 1.0;  local    var integer: stop is 0;  begin    if base = 0.0 then      if exponent < 0 then        power := Infinity;      elsif exponent > 0 then        power := 0.0;      end if;    else      if exponent < 0 then        stop := -1;      end if;      if odd(exponent) then        power := base;      end if;      exponent >>:= 1;      while exponent <> stop do        base *:= base;        if odd(exponent) then          power *:= base;        end if;        exponent >>:= 1;      end while;      if stop = -1 then        power := 1.0 / power;      end if;    end if;  end func;`

Original source: [2]

Since Seed7 supports operator and function overloading a new exponentiation operator like ^* can be defined for integer and float bases:

`\$ syntax expr: .(). ^* .() is <- 4; const func integer: (in var integer: base) ^* (in var integer: exponent) is  return intPow(base, exponent); const func float: (in var float: base) ^* (in var integer: exponent) is  return fltIPow(base, exponent);`

## Sidef

Function definition:

`func expon(_, {.is_zero}) { 1 } func expon(base, exp {.is_neg}) {    expon(1/base, -exp)} func expon(base, exp {.is_int}) {   var c = 1  while (exp > 1) {    c *= base if exp.is_odd    base *= base    exp >>= 1  }   return (base * c)} say expon(3, 10)say expon(5.5, -3)`

Operator definition:

`class Number {    method ⊙(exp) {        expon(self, exp)    }} say (3 ⊙ 10)say (5.5 ⊙ -3)`
Output:
```59049
0.006010518407212622088655146506386175807661607813673929376408715251690458302028550142749812171299774605559729526671675432
```

## Slate

This code is from the current slate implementation:

`x@(Number traits) raisedTo: y@(Integer traits)[  y isZero ifTrue: [^ x unit].  x isZero \/ [y = 1] ifTrue: [^ x].  y isPositive    ifTrue:      "(x * x raisedTo: y // 2) * (x raisedTo: y \\ 2)"      [| count result |       count: 1.       [(count: (count bitShift: 1)) < y] whileTrue.       result: x unit.       [count isPositive]	 whileTrue:	   [result: result squared.	    (y bitAnd: count) isZero ifFalse: [result: result * x].	    count: (count bitShift: -1)].       result]    ifFalse: [(x raisedTo: y negated) reciprocal]].`

For floating numbers:

`x@(Float traits) raisedTo: y@(Float traits)"Implements floating-point exponentiation in terms of the natural logarithmand exponential primitives - this is generally faster than the naive method."[  y isZero ifTrue: [^ x unit].  x isZero \/ [y isUnit] ifTrue: [^ x].  (x ln * y) exp].`

## Smalltalk

Works with: GNU Smalltalk

Extending the class Number, we provide the operator for integers, floating points, rationals numbers (and any other derived class)

`Number extend [  ** anInt [       | r |       ( anInt isInteger )            ifFalse:              [ '** works fine only for integer powers'	        displayOn: stderr . Character nl displayOn: stderr ].       r := 1.       1 to: anInt do: [ :i | r := ( r * self ) ].       ^r  ]]. ( 2.5 ** 3 ) displayNl.( 2 ** 10 ) displayNl.( 3/7 ** 3 ) displayNl.`
Output:
```15.625
1024
27/343```

## Standard ML

The following operators only take nonnegative integer exponents.

`fun expt_int (a, b) = let  fun aux (x, i) =    if i = b then x    else aux (x * a, i + 1)in  aux (1, 0)end fun expt_real (a, b) = let  fun aux (x, i) =    if i = b then x    else aux (x * a, i + 1)in  aux (1.0, 0)end val op ** = expt_intinfix 6 **val op *** = expt_realinfix 6 ***`
`- 2 ** 3;val it = 8 : int- 2.4 *** 3;val it = 13.824 : real`

## Tcl

Works with: Tcl version 8.5

Tcl already has both an exponentiation function (`set x [expr {pow(2.4, 3.5)}]`) and operator (`set x [expr {2.4 ** 3.5}]`). The operator cannot be overridden. The function may be overridden by a procedure in the `tcl::mathfunc` namespace, relative to the calling namespace.

This solution does not consider negative exponents.

`package require Tcl 8.5proc tcl::mathfunc::mypow {a b} {    if { ! [string is int -strict \$b]} {error "exponent must be an integer"}    set res 1    for {set i 1} {\$i <= \$b} {incr i} {set res [expr {\$res * \$a}]}    return \$res}expr {mypow(3, 3)} ;# ==> 27expr {mypow(3.5, 3)} ;# ==> 42.875expr {mypow(3.5, 3.2)} ;# ==> exponent must be an integer`

## Ursa

`# these implementations ignore negative exponentsdef intpow (int m, int n)	if (< n 1)		return 1	end if	decl int ret	set ret 1	for () (> n 0) (dec n)		set ret (* ret m)	end for	return retend intpow def floatpow (double m, int n)	if (or (< n 1) (and (= m 0) (= n 0)))		return 1	end if	decl int ret	set ret 1	for () (> n 0) (dec n)		set ret (* ret m)	end for	return retend floatpow`

## VBScript

` Function pow(x,y)	pow = 1	If y < 0 Then 		For i = 1 To Abs(y)			pow = pow * (1/x)		Next	Else		For i = 1 To y			pow = pow * x		Next	End IfEnd Function WScript.StdOut.Write "2 ^ 0 = " & pow(2,0)WScript.StdOut.WriteLineWScript.StdOut.Write "7 ^ 6 = " & pow(7,6)WScript.StdOut.WriteLineWScript.StdOut.Write "3.14159265359 ^ 9 = " & pow(3.14159265359,9)WScript.StdOut.WriteLineWScript.StdOut.Write "4 ^ -6 = " & pow(4,-6)WScript.StdOut.WriteLineWScript.StdOut.Write "-3 ^ 5 = " & pow(-3,5)WScript.StdOut.WriteLine `
Output:
```2 ^ 0 = 1
7 ^ 6 = 117649
3.14159265359 ^ 9 = 29809.0993334639
4 ^ -6 = 0.000244140625
-3 ^ 5 = -243
```

## XPL0

To create an exponent operator you need to modify the compiler code, which is open source.

`include c:\cxpl\codes;  \intrinsic 'code' declarations func real Power(X, Y);  \X raised to the Y power; (X > 0.0)real X;  int Y;return Exp(float(Y) * Ln(X)); func IPower(X, Y);      \X raised to the Y powerint  X, Y;int  P;[P:= 1;while Y do    [if Y&1 then P:= P*X;    X:= X*X;    Y:= Y>>1;    ];return P;]; int X, Y;[Format(9, 0);for X:= 1 to 10 do    [for Y:= 0 to 7 do        RlOut(0, Power(float(X), Y));    CrLf(0);    ];CrLf(0);for X:= 1 to 10 do    [for Y:= 0 to 7 do        [ChOut(0, 9);  IntOut(0, IPower(X, Y))];    CrLf(0);    ];]`
Output:
```        1        1        1        1        1        1        1        1
1        2        4        8       16       32       64      128
1        3        9       27       81      243      729     2187
1        4       16       64      256     1024     4096    16384
1        5       25      125      625     3125    15625    78125
1        6       36      216     1296     7776    46656   279936
1        7       49      343     2401    16807   117649   823543
1        8       64      512     4096    32768   262144  2097152
1        9       81      729     6561    59049   531441  4782969
1       10      100     1000    10000   100000  1000000 10000000

1       1       1       1       1       1       1       1
1       2       4       8       16      32      64      128
1       3       9       27      81      243     729     2187
1       4       16      64      256     1024    4096    16384
1       5       25      125     625     3125    15625   78125
1       6       36      216     1296    7776    46656   279936
1       7       49      343     2401    16807   117649  823543
1       8       64      512     4096    32768   262144  2097152
1       9       81      729     6561    59049   531441  4782969
1       10      100     1000    10000   100000  1000000 10000000
```

## zkl

Int and Float have pow methods and zkl doesn't allow you to add operators, classes can implement existing ones.

Translation of: C
`fcn pow(n,exp){   reg v;   if(n.isType(1)){ // Int      if (exp<0) return(if(n*n!=1) 0 else (if(exp.isOdd) n else 1));      v=1;    }else{      if(exp<0){ n=1.0/n; exp=-exp; }      v=1.0;   }   while(exp>0){      if(exp.isOdd) v*=n;      n*=n;      exp/=2;   }   v}`
`println("2^6 = %d".fmt(pow(2,6)));println("2^-6 = %d".fmt(pow(2,-6)));println("2.71^6 = %f".fmt(pow(2.71,6)));println("2.71^-6 = %f".fmt(pow(2.71,-6)));`
Output:
```2^6 = 64
2^-6 = 0
2.71^6 = 396.109944
2.71^-6 = 0.002525
```

## ZX Spectrum Basic

ZX Spectrum Basic does not support custom operators or integer datatypes, but here we implement exponentation using a function. The function itself makes use of the inbuilt exponentiation operator, which is kind of cheating, but hey this provides a working implementation.

`10 PRINT e(3,2): REM 3 ^ 220 PRINT e(1.5,2.7): REM 1.5 ^ 2.730 STOP9950 DEF FN e(a,b)=a^b`