Variadic function

From Rosetta Code
Task
Variadic function
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.
Task

Create a function which takes in a variable number of arguments and prints each one on its own line.

Also show, if possible in your language, how to call the function on a list of arguments constructed at runtime.


Functions of this type are also known as Variadic Functions.


Related task



ACL2

(defun print-all-fn (xs)
   (if (endp xs)
       nil
       (prog2$ (cw "~x0~%" (first xs))
               (print-all-fn (rest xs)))))

(defmacro print-all (&rest args)
   `(print-all-fn (quote ,args)))

ActionScript

public function printArgs(... args):void
{
    for (var i:int = 0; i < args.length; i++)
        trace(args[i]);
}

Ada

Ada doesn't have variadic functions. But you can mimic the behavior by defining a function with an unconstrained array as its parameter, i.e., an array whose length is determined at run time.

with Ada.Strings.Unbounded, Ada.Text_IO;

procedure Variadic is

   subtype U_String is Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Unbounded_String;
   use type U_String;

   function "+"(S: String) return U_String
     renames Ada.Strings.Unbounded.To_Unbounded_String;

   function "-"(U: U_String) return String
     renames Ada.Strings.Unbounded.To_String;

   type Variadic_Array is array(Positive range <>) of U_String;

   procedure Print_Line(Params: Variadic_Array) is
   begin
      for I in Params'Range loop
         Ada.Text_IO.Put(-Params(I));
         if I < Params'Last then
            Ada.Text_IO.Put(" ");
         end if;
      end loop;
      Ada.Text_IO.New_Line;
   end Print_Line;

begin
   Print_Line((+"Mary", +"had", +"a", +"little", +"lamb.")); -- print five strings
   Print_Line((1 => +"Rosetta Code is cooool!")); -- print one string
end;
Output:
Mary had a little lamb.
Rosetta Code is cooool!

Aime

Printing strings:

void
f(...)
{
    integer i;

    i = 0;
    while (i < count()) {
	o_text($i);
	o_byte('\n');
	i += 1;
    }
}

integer
main(void)
{
    f("Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb");

    return 0;
}

Printing data of assorted types:

void
output_date(date d)
{
    o_form("~%//f2/%//f2/", d.year, d.y_month, d.m_day);
}

void
g(...)
{
    integer i;
    record r;

    r["integer"] = o_integer;
    r["real"] = o_;
    r["text"] = o_text;
    r["date"] = output_date;

    i = 0;
    while (i < count()) {
        r[__type($i)]($i);
        o_byte('\n');
        i += 1;
    }
}

integer
main(void)
{
    g("X.1", 707, .5, date().now);

    return 0;
}

ALGOL 68

Variable arguments of arbitrarily typed values are not permitted in ALGOL 68. However a flexible array of tagged types (union) is permitted. This effectively allows the passing of strongly typed variable arguments to procedures.

Works with: ALGOL 68 version Revision 1 - no extensions to language used
Works with: ALGOL 68G version Any - tested with release 1.18.0-9h.tiny
Works with: ELLA ALGOL 68 version Any (with appropriate job cards) - tested with release 1.8-8d
main:(
  MODE STRINT = UNION(STRING, INT, PROC(REF FILE)VOID, VOID);

  PROC print strint = (FLEX[]STRINT argv)VOID: (
    FOR i TO UPB argv DO
      CASE argv[i] IN
        (INT i):print(whole(i,-1)),
        (STRING s):print(s),
        (PROC(REF FILE)VOID f):f(stand out),
        (VOID):print(error char)
      ESAC;
      IF i NE UPB argv THEN print((" ")) FI
    OD
  );

 print strint(("Mary","had",1,"little",EMPTY,new line))
)

Output:

Mary had 1 little *

Also note that empty (of type void) can be used to indicate missing or optional arguments.

For another example see Average/Simple moving average. This example is closer to the keyword arguments found in python.

AppleScript

Works with: OS X Yosemite onwards version (10.10+) for the use of NSDictionary with record arguments

AppleScript handlers have no internal access to an argument vector, but we can use AppleScript's Patterned Parameters, in the form of lists of arbitrary length for variadic positional parameters, or records for variadic named parameters.

use framework "Foundation"

-- positionalArgs :: [a] -> String
on positionalArgs(xs)
    
    -- follow each argument with a line feed
    map(my putStrLn, xs) as string
end positionalArgs

-- namedArgs :: Record -> String
on namedArgs(rec)
    script showKVpair
        on |λ|(k)
            my putStrLn(k & " -> " & keyValue(rec, k))
        end |λ|
    end script
    
    -- follow each argument name and value with line feed    
    map(showKVpair, allKeys(rec)) as string
end namedArgs

-- TEST
on run
    intercalate(linefeed, ¬
        {positionalArgs(["alpha", "beta", "gamma", "delta"]), ¬
            namedArgs({epsilon:27, zeta:48, eta:81, theta:8, iota:1})})
    
    --> "alpha
    --   beta
    --   gamma
    --   delta
    -- 
    --   epsilon -> 27
    --   eta -> 81
    --   iota -> 1
    --   zeta -> 48
    --   theta -> 8
    --  "
end run


-- GENERIC FUNCTIONS

-- putStrLn :: a -> String
on putStrLn(a)
    (a as string) & linefeed
end putStrLn

-- map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
on map(f, xs)
    tell mReturn(f)
        set lng to length of xs
        set lst to {}
        repeat with i from 1 to lng
            set end of lst to |λ|(item i of xs, i, xs)
        end repeat
        return lst
    end tell
end map

-- intercalate :: Text -> [Text] -> Text
on intercalate(strText, lstText)
    set {dlm, my text item delimiters} to {my text item delimiters, strText}
    set strJoined to lstText as text
    set my text item delimiters to dlm
    return strJoined
end intercalate

-- allKeys :: Record -> [String]
on allKeys(rec)
    (current application's NSDictionary's dictionaryWithDictionary:rec)'s allKeys() as list
end allKeys

-- keyValue :: Record -> String -> Maybe String
on keyValue(rec, strKey)
    set ca to current application
    set v to (ca's NSDictionary's dictionaryWithDictionary:rec)'s objectForKey:strKey
    if v is not missing value then
        item 1 of ((ca's NSArray's arrayWithObject:v) as list)
    else
        missing value
    end if
end keyValue

-- Lift 2nd class handler function into 1st class script wrapper 
-- mReturn :: Handler -> Script
on mReturn(f)
    if class of f is script then
        f
    else
        script
            property |λ| : f
        end script
    end if
end mReturn
Output:
"alpha
beta
gamma
delta

epsilon -> 27
eta -> 81
iota -> 1
zeta -> 48
theta -> 8
"

Applesoft BASIC

An array of parameters with a count as parameter zero can be used in a subroutine to simulate a variadic function. The values in the array should probably be cleared when the subroutine returns because the array is a global variable.

10 P$(0) = STR$(5)
20 P$(1) = "MARY"
30 P$(2) = "HAD"
40 P$(3) = "A"
50 P$(4) = "LITTLE"
60 P$(5) = "LAMB"
70 GOSUB 90"VARIADIC FUNCTION
80 END
90 FOR I = 1 TO VAL(P$(0)) : ? P$(I) : P$(I) = "" : NEXT I : P$(0) = "" : RETURN

Arturo

;-------------------------------------------
; a quasi-variadic function
;-------------------------------------------
variadic: function [args][
    loop args 'arg [
        print arg
    ]
]

; calling function with one block param
; and the arguments inside

variadic ["one" 2 "three"]

;-------------------------------------------
; a function with optional attributes
;-------------------------------------------
variable: function [args][
    print ["args:" args]
    if? attr? "with" [
        print ["with:" attr "with"]
    ]
    else [
        print "without attributes"
    ]
]

variable "yes"
variable.with:"something" "yes!"
Output:
one
2
three
args: yes 
without attributes
args: yes! 
with: something

AutoHotkey

Works with: AutoHotkey_L

Writing an asterisk after the final parameter marks the function as variadic, allowing it to receive a variable number of parameters:

printAll(args*) {
  for k,v in args
    t .= v "`n"
  MsgBox, %t%
}
This function can be called with any number of arguments:
printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3)
printAll(4, 3, 5)
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!")
An array of parameters can be passed to any function by applying the same syntax to a function-call:
args := ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"]
printAll(args*)


AutoHotkey Basic (deprecated):

Function arguments can be given default values. Comparison with "" can indicate that an argument was present (and not of value ""). As of version 1.0.48, you can pass more parameters than defined by a function, in which case the parameters are evaluated but discarded. Versions earlier than that produce warnings.

string = Mary had a little lamb
StringSplit, arg, string, %A_Space%

Function(arg1,arg2,arg3,arg4,arg5)  ;Calls the function with 5 arguments.
Function()  ;Calls the function with no arguments.
return

Function(arg1="",arg2="",arg3="",arg4="",arg5="") {
  Loop,5
    If arg%A_Index% !=
      out .= arg%A_Index% "`n"
  MsgBox,% out ? out:"No non-blank arguments were passed."
}

AWK

AWK allows to call functions with fewer than the defined arguments; the missing one(s) default to "". Comparison with "" can check if the argument was present (and not of value ""). To call a function with more than the defined arguments, this produces a warning.

This f() can accept 0 to 3 arguments.

function f(a, b, c){
	if (a != "") print a
	if (b != "") print b
	if (c != "") print c
}

BEGIN {
	print "[1 arg]"; f(1)
	print "[2 args]"; f(1, 2)
	print "[3 args]"; f(1, 2, 3)
}
[1 arg]
1
[2 args]
1
2
[3 args]
1
2
3

This f() can also accept array elements. This works because any missing array elements default to "", so f() ignores them.

function f(a, b, c) {
	if (a != "") print a
	if (b != "") print b
	if (c != "") print c
}

BEGIN {
	# Set ary[1] and ary[2] at runtime.
	split("Line 1:Line 2", ary, ":")

	# Pass to f().
	f(ary[1], ary[2], ary[3])
}
Line 1
Line 2

Functions like f() can take only a few arguments. To accept more arguments, or to accept "" as an argument, the function must take an array, and the caller must bundle its arguments into an array. This g() accepts 0 or more arguments in an array.

function g(len, ary,    i) {
	for (i = 1; i <= len; i++) print ary[i];
}

BEGIN {
	c = split("Line 1:Line 2:Next line is empty::Last line", a, ":")
	g(c, a)		# Pass a[1] = "Line 1", a[4] = "", ...

}
Line 1
Line 2
Next line is empty

Last line

BaCon

Variable argument lists are defined with the keyword VAR, and are passed as an indexed array of strings. The number of elements is specified by a SIZE parameter. Arguments to functions could also simply be indexed or associative arrays or multiple element delimited strings.

' Variadic functions
OPTION BASE 1
SUB demo (VAR arg$ SIZE argc)
    LOCAL x
    PRINT "Amount of incoming arguments: ", argc
    FOR x = 1 TO argc
        PRINT arg$[x]
    NEXT
END SUB

' No argument
demo(0)
' One argument
demo("abc")
' Three arguments
demo("123", "456", "789")
Output:
prompt$ bacon variadic.bac
Converting 'variadic.bac'... done, 16 lines were processed in 0.003 seconds.
Compiling 'variadic.bac'... cc  -c variadic.bac.c
cc -o variadic variadic.bac.o -lbacon -lm
Done, program 'variadic' ready.

prompt$ ./variadic
Amount of incoming arguments: 0
Amount of incoming arguments: 1
abc
Amount of incoming arguments: 3
123
456
789

BASIC

Using variable arguments has not been standardised in BASIC. Therefore there are several different implementations, and many BASIC versions do not have this feature at all.

Works with: FreeBASIC

Variadic functions on FreeBASIC are somewhat similar to those in C. The parameter list does not pass information about parameter type. If necessary, the type information has to be passed for example in the first parameter. C calling convention has to be used (with keyword cdecl).

SUB printAll cdecl (count As Integer, ... )
    DIM arg AS Any Ptr 
    DIM i   AS Integer

    arg = va_first()
    FOR i = 1 To count
        PRINT va_arg(arg, Double)
        arg = va_next(arg, Double)
    NEXT i
END SUB

printAll 3, 3.1415, 1.4142, 2.71828

For some reason, I was not able to get a Strings version of the above to work.

FreeBASIC

String version

' version 15-09-2015
' compile with: fbc -s console

Sub printAll_string Cdecl (count As Integer, ... )
    Dim arg As Any Ptr
    Dim i   As Integer

    arg = va_first()
    For i = 1 To count
        Print *Va_Arg(arg, ZString Ptr)
        arg = va_next(arg, ZString Ptr)
    Next i
End Sub

' ------=< MAIN >=------
' direct
printAll_string (5, "Foxtrot", "Romeo", "Echo", "Echo", "BASIC")

' strings
Print : Print
Dim As String a = "one", b = "two", c = "three"
printAll_string (3, a, b, c)

' count is smaller then the number of arguments, no problem
Print : Print
printAll_string (1, a, b, c)

' count is greater then the number of arguments
' after the last valid argument garbage is displayed
' should be avoided, could lead to disaster
Print : Print
printAll_string (4, a, b, c)
Print

' empty keyboard buffer 
While InKey <> "" : Wend
Print : Print "hit any key to end program"
Sleep
End
Output:
only the last example shown
one
two
three
…À�”ÀƒÄ��¶À÷ØÃ���¡<"A
Works with: Beta BASIC version 3.0
Works with: SAM BASIC

Beta BASIC uses keyword DATA to specify variable parameter list. The parameters are read with READ command just like when reading conventional DATA statements. The existence of more parameters as well as the type of each parameter can be checked with function ITEM().

100 DEF PROC printAll DATA
110   DO UNTIL ITEM()=0
120     IF ITEM()=1 THEN
          READ a$
          PRINT a$
130     ELSE
          READ num
          PRINT num
140   LOOP
150 END PROC

200 printAll 3.1415, 1.4142, 2.71828
210 printAll "Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb",

The code above is for Beta BASIC. There is a small difference between Beta BASIC and SAM BASIC. On Beta BASIC, the function ITEM has empty parenthesis, on SAM BASIC the parenthesis are not used.

See also: RapidQ

Batch File

@echo off

:_main
call:_variadicfunc arg1 "arg 2" arg-3
pause>nul

:_variadicfunc
setlocal
for %%i in (%*) do echo %%~i
exit /b

:: Note: if _variadicfunc was called from cmd.exe with arguments parsed to it, it would only need to contain:
::  @for %%i in (%*) do echo %%i
Output:
arg1
arg 2
arg-3

bc

To simulate a variadic function one would define a function which takes an array as parameter and

a) a second parameter for the actual number of arguments,
b) uses a special value which marks the end or
c) the first element in the array specifies the number of arguments.
/* Version a */
define f(a[], l) {
    auto i
    for (i = 0; i < l; i++) a[i]
}

/* Version b */
define g(a[]) {
    auto i    
    for (i = 0; a[i] != -1; i++) a[i]
}

/* Version c */
define h(a[]) {
    auto i
    
    for (i = 1; i <= a[0]; i++) a[i]
}

BCPL

BCPL does not have true variadic functions, however, it is explicitly legal to pass a function the "wrong" amount of arguments. If fewer arguments are passed than declared, the rest will remain uninitialized, if too many are passed, the excess arguments are ignored. Additionally, it is guaranteed that the arguments will be located sequentially in memory, starting from the first, making it possible to treat the address of the first argument as if it is in fact an array of arguments.

These two facts together make it easy to declare a "variadic" function by simply specifying a whole bunch of dummy arguments in the declaration, and then calling the function later on with however many you happen to need. At least as many arguments as you declare are guaranteed to make it through, though any more will not necessarily.

This technique is used in the standard library (this is how writef, the equivalent to C's printf, is defined), and the book BCPL: The Language and its Compiler by BCPL designer Martin Richards (which is as official as it gets) explicitly introduces this technique.

get "libhdr"

// A, B, C, etc are dummy arguments. If more are needed, more can be added.
// Eventually you will run into the compiler limit. 
let foo(num, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O) be
    // The arguments can be indexed starting from the first one. 
    for i=1 to num do writef("%S*N", (@num)!i)
    
// You can pass as many arguments as you want. The declaration above guarantees
// that at least the first 16 arguments (including the number) will be available,
// but you certainly needn't use them all. 
let start() be
    foo(5, "Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb")
Output:
Mary
had
a
little
lamb

BQN

All BQN functions can be variadic since they allow taking lists of arbitrary length as arguments. A function can reject variadicity by defining a header to restrict the arguments to a specific length.

Fun1  •Show¨
Fun2  {•Show¨𝕩}
Fun3  { 1=≠𝕩 ? •Show 𝕩; "too many arguments " ! 𝕩}

Both Fun1 and Fun2 display all the values (arguments) of the lists given to them.

Fun3 throws an error if the given argument is not a list of length 1 or not a list at all. Otherwise it displays its argument.

C

The ANSI C standard header stdarg.h defines macros for low-level access to the parameter stack. It does not know the number or types of these parameters; this is specified by the required initial parameter(s). For example, it could be a simple count, a terminating NULL, or a more complicated parameter specification like a printf() format string.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdarg.h>

void varstrings(int count, ...)   /* the ellipsis indicates variable arguments */
{
    va_list args;
    va_start(args, count);
    while (count--)
        puts(va_arg(args, const char *));
    va_end(args);
}

varstrings(5, "Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb");

In C, there is no way to call a variadic function on a list of arguments constructed at runtime.

However, all standard library functions which are variadic have a corresponding version, usually named by prepending the letter "v", that is non-variadic and takes a va_list as argument in place of the variadic arguments. For example, printf has a corresponding vprintf which takes a format string and a va_list value as arguments.

Nevertheless, the only way of obtaining a va_list is from a variadic function itself. So the "v" functions are only useful for writing a variadic function "wrapper" that performs some processing and then calls on one of the "v" functions with its va_list. C still provides no standard way to construct a va_list manually at runtime.

The actual implementation of va_list is implementation-dependent. If you are developing on a specific platform, you may use platform-specific knowledge to create a va_list by hand in a non-portable way. For example, on many platforms, a va_list is simply a pointer to a buffer where the arguments are arranged contiguously in memory.

C#

using System;

class Program {
    static void Main(string[] args) {
        PrintAll("test", "rosetta code", 123, 5.6);
    }

    static void PrintAll(params object[] varargs) {
        foreach (var i in varargs) {
            Console.WriteLine(i);
        }
    }
}

Output:

test
rosetta code
123
5.6

C++

The C++ varargs are basically the same as in C (therefore you can just take the code from C), but there are some limitations:

  • Only PODs (basically, every type you could also write in C) can be passed to varargs
  • An important difference is that enums are distinct types with possibly different representation than int in C++, but enumeration values are still converted to int when passed to varargs. Therefore they have to be accessed as int in va_arg.

C++11 in addition allows typesafe variadic arguments through variadic templates. Some compilers, such as gcc, already provide this functionality. The following implements the task with variadic templates:

Works with: g++ version 4.3.0
using option -std=c++0x
#include <iostream>

template<typename T>
 void print(T const& t)
{
  std::cout << t;
}

template<typename First, typename ... Rest>
 void print(First const& first, Rest const& ... rest)
{
  std::cout << first;
  print(rest ...);
}

int main()
{
  int i = 10;
  std::string s = "Hello world";
  print("i = ", i, " and s = \"", s, "\"\n");
}

As the example shows, variadic templates allow any type to be passed.

Clojure

(defn foo [& args]
  (doseq [a args]
    (println a)))

(foo :bar :baz :quux)
(apply foo [:bar :baz :quux])

COBOL

       program-id. dsp-str is external.
       data division.
       linkage section.
       1 cnt comp-5 pic 9(4).
       1 str pic x.
       procedure division using by value cnt
           by reference str delimited repeated 1 to 5.
       end program dsp-str.

       program-id. variadic.
       procedure division.
           call "dsp-str" using 4 "The" "quick" "brown" "fox"
           stop run
           .
       end program variadic.

       program-id. dsp-str.
       data division.
       working-storage section.
       1 i comp-5 pic 9(4).
       1 len comp-5 pic 9(4).
       1 wk-string pic x(20).
       linkage section.
       1 cnt comp-5 pic 9(4).
       1 str1 pic x(20).
       1 str2 pic x(20).
       1 str3 pic x(20).
       1 str4 pic x(20).
       1 str5 pic x(20).
       procedure division using cnt str1 str2 str3 str4 str5.
           if cnt < 1 or > 5
               display "Invalid number of parameters"
               stop run
           end-if
           perform varying i from 1 by 1
           until i > cnt
               evaluate i
               when 1
                   unstring str1 delimited low-value
                   into wk-string count in len
               when 2
                   unstring str2 delimited low-value
                   into wk-string count in len
               when 3
                   unstring str3 delimited low-value
                   into wk-string count in len
               when 4
                   unstring str4 delimited low-value
                   into wk-string count in len
               when 5
                   unstring str5 delimited low-value
                   into wk-string count in len
               end-evaluate
               display wk-string (1:len)
           end-perform
           exit program
           .
       end program dsp-str.
Output:
The
quick
brown
fox

Common Lisp

The &rest lambda list keyword causes all remaining arguments to be bound to the following variable.

(defun example (&rest args)
  (dolist (arg args)
    (print arg)))

(example "Mary" "had" "a" "little" "lamb")

(let ((args '("Mary" "had" "a" "little" "lamb")))
  (apply #'example args))

Coq

To define a variadic function, we build a variadic type:

Fixpoint Arity (A B: Set) (n: nat): Set := match n with
|O => B
|S n' => A -> (Arity A B n')
end.

This function can be used as a type, Arity A B n means . Hence each functions that takes an arbitrary number n of parameter of type A and returns B will have the type Arity A B n (Note that we can parameter n to be a specific value)
Those functions will be called with their first parameters yielding the number of arguments and the rest being the arguments themselves.


Since Arity is a type, we can compound it with itself as the destination to mean, for instance, "n naturals and 2 * n booleans" like so:

Definition nat_twobools (n: nat) := Arity nat (Arity bool nat (2*n)) n.

There is no equivalent to printf in Coq, because this function has border effects. We will then instead of printing each arguments build a list from it.
Our function has type Arity A (list A) n and we obviously want to use induction on n. To build the heritance, we will have the hypothesis of Arity A (list A) n and will have to build a term of Arity A (list A) (S n). Forall A and B, Arity A B (S n) is but , aka a function that takes A and returns an Arity A B n
Hence to introduce a new value, we simply create a function that takes one parameter and uses it.
Finally, for the function to work, we need an accumulator of some sort

Require Import List.
Fixpoint build_list_aux {A: Set} (acc: list A) (n : nat): Arity A (list A) n := match n with
|O => acc
|S n' => fun (val: A) => build_list_aux (acc ++ (val :: nil)) n'
end.

Our function is then just an application of this one:

Definition build_list {A: Set} := build_list_aux (@nil A).

To call it we give it the number of argument and then the parameters we want in the list

Check build_list 5 1 2 5 90 42.

Which gives the result [1; 2; 5; 90; 42]

If instead of a list we wanted a vector (a list which size is now in its own type), then it gets trickier.
One of the problem is that we will have to prove equality of types such as one of the types t A n and t A (n + 0). We should not use lemmas or automatic tactics in this case. The reason for that is that the proof will be then a part of the type and computation of our function, so when we will try to compute it, Coq will be unable to unfold the opaque proof. Instead we should define our own lemmas and set their opacity to be transparent. Here are the two lemmas we will need:

Lemma transparent_plus_zero: forall n, n + O = n.
intros n; induction n.
- reflexivity.
- simpl; rewrite IHn; trivial.
Defined.

Lemma transparent_plus_S: forall n m, n + S m = S n + m .
intros n; induction n; intros m.
- reflexivity.
- simpl; f_equal; rewrite IHn; reflexivity.
Defined.

Now on to the function.
Here the accumulator has to be of a fixed size, so we give this size a value, and for each step, we decrement the number of argument and increment this size. The size of the result is the sum of the size of the accumulator and of the current number of argument. This sum is constant. Instead of defining a function directly, we will construct it as a proof that will be easier for us to write:

Require Import Vector.

Definition build_vector_aux {A: Set} (n: nat): forall (size_acc : nat) (acc: t A size_acc), Arity A (t A (size_acc + n)) n.
induction n; intros size_acc acc.
- rewrite transparent_plus_zero; apply acc. (*Just one argument, return the accumulator*)
- intros val. rewrite transparent_plus_S. apply IHn. (*Here we use the induction hypothesis. We just have to build the new accumulator*)
  apply shiftin; [apply val | apply acc]. (*Shiftin adds a term at the end of a vector*)

As before, we can now build the full function with a null accumulator:

Definition build_vector {A: Set} (n: nat) := build_vector_aux n O (@nil A).

When we call it:

Require Import String.
Eval compute in build_vector 4 "Hello" "how" "are" "you".

Which gives the vector of members "Hello", "how", "are" and "you" of size 4

D

import std.stdio, std.algorithm;

void printAll(TyArgs...)(TyArgs args) {
    foreach (el; args)
        el.writeln;
}

// Typesafe variadic function for dynamic array
void showSum1(int[] items...) {
    items.sum.writeln;
}

// Typesafe variadic function for fixed size array
void showSum2(int[4] items...) {
    items[].sum.writeln;
}

void main() {
    printAll(4, 5.6, "Rosetta", "Code", "is", "awesome");
    writeln;
    showSum1(1, 3, 50);
    showSum2(1, 3, 50, 10);
}
Output:
4
5.6
Rosetta
Code
is
awesome

54
64

Being a system language, in D there are also:

  • C-style variadic functions
  • D-style variadic functions with type info
  • Typesafe variadic function for class objects

See for more info: http://dlang.org/function.html

Delphi

See Free Pascal.

Dyalect

func printAll(args...) {
    for i in args {
        print(i)
    }
}

printAll("test", "rosetta code", 123, 5.6)
Output:
test
rosetta code
123
5.6

Déjà Vu

Variadic functions in the Déjà Vu standard library generally end with (, [ or {. For this purpose, ), ] and } are autonyms (that is, they have a global bindings to themselves, so that ) is the same as :)).

show-all(:
    while /= ) dup:
        !.
    drop

show-all( :foo "Hello" 42 [ true ] )
Output:
:foo
"Hello"
42
[ true ]

E

Varargs is mildly unidiomatic in E, as the argument count is dispatched on, and often considered part of the method name.

However, accepting any number of arguments can easily be done, as it is just a particular case of the basic mechanism for dynamic message handling:

def example {
    match [`run`, args] {
        for x in args {
            println(x)
        }
    }
}

example("Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb")

E.call(example, "run", ["Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb"])


For comparison, a plain method doing the same thing for exactly two arguments would be like this:

def non_example {
    to run(x, y) {
        println(x)
        println(y)
    }
}

or, written using the function syntax,

def non_example(x, y) {
    println(x)
    println(y)
}

Ecstasy

Ecstasy does not support a true variadic function (a la C with "...") or a syntactic sugar for the same (a la Java with "..." and the underlying Object[]). Instead, when a variadic call is needed, the method or function is declared with the desired array type, and the caller simply passes an array value of any length using the literal array syntax:

module VariadicFunction {
    void show(String[] strings) {
        @Inject Console console;
        strings.forEach(s -> console.print(s));
    }

    void run() {
        show(["hello", "world"]);

        String s1 = "not";
        String s2 = "a";
        String s3 = "constant";
        String s4 = "literal";
        show([s1, s2, s3, s4]);
    }
}
Output:
hello
world
not
a
constant
literal

Egel

Egel performs almost all of its work with pattern-matching anonymous functions which may match against any number of arguments. The following combinator discriminates between 2, 1, or 0 arguments; more elaborate examples are straightforward.

[ X Y -> "two" | X -> "one" | -> "zero" ]

Elena

ELENA 6.x :

import system'routines;
import extensions;
 
extension variadicOp
{
    printAll(params object[] list)
    {
        for(int i := 0; i < list.Length; i++) 
        {
            self.printLine(list[i])
        }
    }    
}
 
public program()
{
    console.printAll("test", "rosetta code", 123, 5.6r)
}
Output:
test
rosetta code
123
5.6

Elixir

Elixir doesn't have the feature of the variable number of arguments. However, it is possible to process as the list if putting in an argument in [].

defmodule RC do
  def print_each( arguments ) do
    Enum.each(arguments, fn x -> IO.inspect x end)
  end
end

RC.print_each([1,2,3])
RC.print_each(["Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb"])
Output:
1
2
3
"Mary"
"had"
"a"
"little"
"lamb"

Emacs Lisp

An &rest in the formal parameters gives all further arguments in a list, which the code can then act on in usual list ways. Fixed arguments can precede the &rest if desired.

(defun my-print-args (&rest arg-list)
  (message "there are %d argument(s)" (length arg-list))
  (dolist (arg arg-list)
    (message "arg is %S" arg)))

(my-print-args 1 2 3)

A function can be called with a list of arguments (and optionally fixed arguments too) with apply, similar to most Lisp variants.

(let ((arg-list '("some thing %d %d %d" 1 2 3)))
  (apply 'message arg-list))

EMal

^|EMal supports variadic functions in more than one way|^
fun print = void by text mode, List args do
  writeLine("== " + mode + " ==")
  for each var arg in args do writeLine(arg) end
end
fun printArgumentsList = void by List args
  print("accepting a list", args)
end
fun printArgumentsUnchecked = void by some var args
  print("unchecked variadic", args)
end
fun printArgumentsChecked = void by text subject, logic isTrue, int howMany, some text values
  print("checked variadic", var[subject, isTrue, howMany, +values]) # unary plus on lists does list expansion
end
printArgumentsList(var["These are the ", true, 7, "seas", "of", "Rhye"])
printArgumentsUnchecked("These are the ", true, 7, "seas", "of", "Rhye")
printArgumentsChecked("These are the ", true, 7, "seas", "of", "Rhye")
Output:
== accepting a list ==
These are the
⊤
7
seas
of
Rhye
== unchecked variadic ==
These are the
⊤
7
seas
of
Rhye
== checked variadic ==
These are the
⊤
7
seas
of
Rhye

Erlang

Variable amount of anything (like arguments): use a list.

print_each( Arguments ) -> [io:fwrite( "~p~n", [X]) || X <- Arguments].

Euler Math Toolbox

>function allargs () ...
$  loop 1 to argn();
$    args(#),
$  end
$endfunction
>allargs(1,3,"Test",1:2)
 1
 3
 Test
 [ 1  2 ]
>function args test (x) := {x,x^2,x^3}
>allargs(test(4))
 4
 16
 64

Euphoria

procedure print_args(sequence args)
    for i = 1 to length(args) do
        puts(1,args[i])
        puts(1,' ')
    end for
end procedure

print_args({"Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb"})

F#

// Variadic function. Nigel Galloway: March 6th., 2024
open System
type X()=static member F([<ParamArray>] args: Object[]) = args|>Array.iter(printfn "%A")
X.F(23, 3.142, "Nigel", 1u, true)
Output:
23
3.142
Nigel
1
true

Factor

Variadic functions can be created by making a word which accepts a number specifying how many data stack items to operate on.

MACRO: variadic-print ( n -- quot ) [ print ] n*quot ;

An interactive demonstration in the listener:

IN: scratchpad "apple" "banana" "cucumber"

--- Data stack:
"apple"
"banana"
"cucumber"

IN: scratchpad 2 variadic-print
cucumber
banana

--- Data stack:
"apple"

Forth

Words taking variable numbers of arguments may be written by specifying the number of parameters to operate upon as the top parameter. There are two standard words which operate this way: PICK and ROLL.

: sum ( x_1 ... x_n n -- sum ) 1 ?do + loop ;
4 3 2 1  4 sum .   \ 10

Alternatively, you can operate upon the entire parameter stack for debugging by using the word DEPTH, which returns the number of items currently on the stack.

: .stack ( -- ) depth 0 ?do i pick . loop ;

Fortran

Works with: Fortran version 95 and later

Fortran has no varargs for subroutines and functions, but has optional arguments and varargs functions can be programmed passing an array as argument. Moreover you can program elemental functions or subroutines, i.e. function acting on a single element but which can be used automatically over a vector (but there are limits to respect in order to make it possible, e.g. it is not possible to use print)

The following code shows how an optional vector argument can be used to pass a variable number of argument to a subroutine.

program varargs

  integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: va
  integer :: i

  ! using an array (vector) static
  call v_func()
  call v_func( (/ 100 /) )
  call v_func( (/ 90, 20, 30 /) )

  ! dynamically creating an array of 5 elements
  allocate(va(5))
  va = (/ (i,i=1,5) /)
  call v_func(va)
  deallocate(va)

contains

  subroutine v_func(arglist)
    integer, dimension(:), intent(in), optional :: arglist

    integer :: i

    if ( present(arglist) ) then
       do i = lbound(arglist, 1), ubound(arglist, 1)
          print *, arglist(i)
       end do
    else
       print *, "no argument at all"
    end if
  end subroutine v_func

end program varargs

Free Pascal

Note, strictly speaking the routine writeLines has exactly one parameter.

program variadicRoutinesDemo(input, output, stdErr);
{$mode objFPC}

// array of const is only supported in $mode objFPC or $mode Delphi
procedure writeLines(const arguments: array of const);
var
	argument: TVarRec;
begin
	// inside the body `array of const` is equivalent to `array of TVarRec`
	for argument in arguments do
	begin	
		with argument do
		begin
			case vType of
				vtInteger:
				begin
					writeLn(vInteger);
				end;
				vtBoolean:
				begin
					writeLn(vBoolean);
				end;
				vtChar:
				begin
					writeLn(vChar);
				end;
				vtAnsiString:
				begin
					writeLn(ansiString(vAnsiString));
				end;
				// and so on
			end;
		end;
	end;
end;

begin
	writeLines([42, 'is', true, #33]);
end.
Output:
42
is
TRUE
!

Fōrmulæ

Fōrmulæ programs are not textual, visualization/edition of programs is done showing/manipulating structures but not text. Moreover, there can be multiple visual representations of the same program. Even though it is possible to have textual representation —i.e. XML, JSON— they are intended for storage and transfer purposes more than visualization and edition.

Programs in Fōrmulæ are created/edited online in its website.

In this page you can see and run the program(s) related to this task and their results. You can also change either the programs or the parameters they are called with, for experimentation, but remember that these programs were created with the main purpose of showing a clear solution of the task, and they generally lack any kind of validation.

Solution

Fōrmulæ does not have variadic functions. However an array can be provided as argument:

Examples

Tee following function accepts a list as its unique parameter. It retrieves the list in vertical form (as a matrix of 1 column):

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 01.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 02.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 03.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 04.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 05.png

With this approach we can use several parameters being lists with variable number of elements each, for example:

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 06.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 07.png

File:Fōrmulæ - Variadic function 08.png

FutureBasic

void local fn Function1( count as long, ... )
  va_list ap
  long value

  va_start( ap, count )
  while ( count )
    value = fn va_argLong( ap )
    printf @"%ld",value
    count--
  wend

  va_end( ap )
end fn

void local fn Function2( obj as CFTypeRef, ... )
  va_list ap

  va_start( ap, obj )
  while ( obj )
    printf @"%@",obj
    obj = fn va_argObj(ap)
  wend

  va_end( ap )
end fn

window 1

// params: num of args, 1st arg, 2nd arg, etc.
fn Function1( 3, 987, 654, 321 )

print

// params: 1st arg, 2nd arg, ..., NULL
fn Function2( @"One", @"Two", @"Three", @"O'Leary", NULL )

HandleEvents
Output:
987
654
321

One
Two
Three
O'Leary

Go

A variadic function in Go has a ... prefix on the type of the final parameter. (spec, Function types)

func printAll(things ... string) {
  // it's as if you declared "things" as a []string, containing all the arguments
  for _, x := range things {
    fmt.Println(x)
  }
}

If you wish to supply an argument list to a variadic function at runtime, you can do this by adding a ... after a slice argument:

args := []string{"foo", "bar"}
printAll(args...)

Golo

#!/usr/bin/env golosh
----
This module demonstrates variadic functions.
----
module Variadic

import gololang.Functions

----
Varargs have the three dots after them just like Java.
----
function varargsFunc = |args...| {
  foreach arg in args {
    println(arg)
  }
}

function main = |args| {

  varargsFunc(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, "against", "one")

  # to call a variadic function with an array we use the unary function
  unary(^varargsFunc)(args)
}

Groovy

def printAll( Object[] args) { args.each{ arg -> println arg } }

printAll(1, 2, "three", ["3", "4"])

Sample output:

1
2
three
[3, 4]

Haskell

You can use some fancy recursive type-class instancing to make a function that takes an unlimited number of arguments. This is how, for example, printf works in Haskell.

class PrintAllType t where
    process :: [String] -> t

instance PrintAllType (IO a) where
    process args = do mapM_ putStrLn args
                      return undefined

instance (Show a, PrintAllType r) => PrintAllType (a -> r) where
    process args = \a -> process (args ++ [show a])

printAll :: (PrintAllType t) => t
printAll = process []

main :: IO ()
main = do printAll 5 "Mary" "had" "a" "little" "lamb"
          printAll 4 3 5
          printAll "Rosetta" "Code" "Is" "Awesome!"

So here we created a type class specially for the use of this variable-argument function. The type class specifies a function, which takes as an argument some kind of accumulated state of the arguments so far, and returns the type of the type class. Here I chose to accumulate a list of the string representations of each of the arguments; this is not the only way to do it; for example, you could choose to print them directly and just accumulate the IO monad.

We need two kinds of instances of this type class. There is the "base case" instance, which has the type that can be thought of as the "return type" of the vararg function. It describes what to do when we are "done" with our arguments. Here we just take the accumulated list of strings and print them, one per line. We actually wanted to use "IO ()" instead of "IO a"; but since you can't instance just a specialization like "IO ()", we used "IO a" but return "undefined" to make sure nobody uses it. Or we can use GADTs pragma and constraint in instance like this :

{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
...

instance a ~ () => PrintAllType (IO a) where
    process args = do mapM_ putStrLn args

...

You can have multiple base case instances; for example, you might want an instances that returns the result as a string instead of printing it. This is how "printf" in Haskell can either print to stdout or print to string (like sprintf in other languages), depending on the type of its context.

The other kind of instance is the "recursive case". It describes what happens when you come across an argument. Here we simply append its string representation to the end of our previous "accumulated state", and then pass that state onto the next iteration. Make sure to specify the requirements of the types of the arguments; here I just required that each argument be an instance of Show (so you can use "show" to get the string representation), but it might be different for you.

Icon and Unicon

varargs.icn

procedure main ()
  varargs("some", "extra", "args")
  write()
  varargs ! ["a","b","c","d"]
end

procedure varargs(args[])
  every write(!args)
end

Using it

|icon varargs.icn
some
extra
args

a
b
c
d

Insitux

(function f
  (print (join "\n" args)))

(f 1 2 3 4)

Io

printAll := method(call message arguments foreach(println))

J

J's data is arbitrary length lists. So all functions implicitly support variable length argument lists unless their definitions specifically reject them.

For example:

   A=:2
   B=:3
   C=:5
   sum=:+/
   sum 1,A,B,4,C
15

That said, J expects that members of lists all use the same kind of machine representation. If you want both character literals and numbers for arguments, or if you want arrays with different dimensions, each argument must be put into a box, and the function is responsible for dealing with the packing material.

   commaAnd=: [: ; (<' and ') _2} ::] 1 }.&, (<', ') ,. ":each
   commaAnd 'dog';A;B;'cat';C
dog, 2, 3, cat and 5

To print each argument on its own line, we would typically map echo over the arguments (in this example, the contents of each box):

   echo&>'dog';A;B;'cat';C
dog
2
3
cat
5

Java

Works with: Java version 1.5+

Using ... after the type of argument will take in any number of arguments and put them all in one array of the given type with the given name.

public static void printAll(Object... things){
   // "things" is an Object[]
   for(Object i:things){
      System.out.println(i);
   }
}

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
printAll(4, 3, 5);
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");

Or with an array directly (the array must have the appropriate array type; i.e. if it is String..., then you need to pass a String[]):

Object[] args = {"Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"};
printAll(args);

But not with both (in this case the array is considered as just one of two arguments, and not expanded):

Object[] args = {"Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome,"};
printAll(args, "Dude!");//does not print "Rosetta Code Is Awesome, Dude!"
//instead prints the type and hashcode for args followed by "Dude!"

In some rare cases, you may want to pass an array as just a single argument, but doing it directly would expand it to be the entire argument. In this case, you need to cast the array to Object (all arrays are objects) so the compiler doesn't know it's an array anymore.

printAll((Object)args);

JavaScript

ES5

The arguments special variable, when used inside a function, contains an array of all the arguments passed to that function.

function printAll() {
  for (var i=0; i<arguments.length; i++)
    print(arguments[i])
}
printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
printAll(4, 3, 5);
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");

The function.arguments property is equivalent to the arguments variable above, but is deprecated.

You can use the apply method of a function to apply it to a list of arguments:

args = ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"]
printAll.apply(null, args)

ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) variants

The newest version of ECMAScript added fat arrow function expression syntax, rest arguments and the spread operator. These make writing something like this easy. Of course, a better version might use Array.prototype.map, but here we have a variant that works on variadic arguments:

let
  fix = // Variant of the applicative order Y combinator
    f => (f => f(f))(g => f((...a) => g(g)(...a))),
  forAll =
    f => 
      fix(
        z => (a,...b) => (
          (a === void 0)
          ||(f(a), z(...b)))),
  printAll = forAll(print);

printAll(0,1,2,3,4,5);
printAll(6,7,8);
(f => a => f(...a))(printAll)([9,10,11,12,13,14]);
//  0
//  1
//  2
//  3
//  4
//  5
//  6
//  7
//  8
//  9
//  10
//  11
//  12
//  13
//  14

Or, less ambitiously:

(() => {
    'use strict';

    // show :: a -> String
    const show = x => JSON.stringify(x, null, 2);

    // printAll [any] -> String
    const printAll = (...a) => a.map(show)
        .join('\n');

    return printAll(1, 2, 3, 2 + 2, "five", 6);
})();
Output:
1
2
3
4
"five"
6

jq

jq does not support variadic functions, but all versions of jq allow JSON arrays and objects to be used as arguments and as inputs of functions, and thus variadic functions can easily be simulated. In addition, as described in the next subsection, recent releases of jq support variadic function names.

The first task requirement can in effect be accomplished using a 0-arity function defined as follows:

def demo: .[];

The parameters would be presented to demo in the form of an array. For example, given an array, args, constructed at runtime, the second task requirement can be accomplished by calling:

args | demo

For example:

["cheese"] + [3.14] + [[range(0;3)]] | demo

produces:

"cheese"
3.14
[0,1,2]

Variadic Function Names:

In this subsection, the notation f/n will be used to refer to a function named f with arity n. For example, recurse/1 is a builtin function that requires one argument.

In recent releases of jq (after version 1.4), function names are variadic in the sense that, if f is a function name, then f/n can be defined for multiple values of n. However, jq does not support the programmatic construction of function calls, and if a function is called with an undefined name/arity combination, then an error will be raised.

# arity-0:
def f: "I have no arguments";

# arity-1:
def f(a1): a1;

# arity-1:
def f(a1;a2): a1,a2;

def f(a1;a2;a3): a1,a2,a3;

# Example:
f, f(1), f(2;3), f(4;5;6)

produces:

1
2
3
4
5
6

Julia

Putting ... after the last argument in a function definition makes it variadic (any number of arguments are passed as a tuple):

julia> print_each(X...) = for x in X; println(x); end

julia> print_each(1, "hello", 23.4)
1
hello
23.4

Conversely, when ... is appended to an array (or other iterable object) passed to the function, the array is converted to a sequence of arguments:

julia> args = [ "first", (1,2,17), "last" ]
3-element Array{Any,1}:
 "first" 
 (1,2,17)
 "last

julia> print_each(args...)
first
(1,2,17)
last

Klingphix

:varfunc
    1 tolist flatten
    len [
        get print nl
    ] for
    drop    
;

"Enter any number of words separated by space: " input nl
stklen [split varfunc nl] if

nl "End " input

Kotlin

// version 1.1

fun variadic(vararg va: String) {
    for (v in va) println(v)
}

fun main(args: Array<String>) {
    variadic("First", "Second", "Third")
    println("\nEnter four strings for the function to print:")
    val va = Array(4) { "" }
    for (i in 1..4) {
        print("String $i = ")
        va[i - 1] = readLine()!!
    }
    println()
    variadic(*va)
}

Sample input/output:

Output:
First
Second
Third

Enter four strings for the function to print:
String 1 = Animal
String 2 = Vegetable
String 3 = Mineral
String 4 = Whatever

Animal
Vegetable
Mineral
Whatever

Ksh

#!/bin/ksh

# Variadic function

#	# Variables:
#
typeset -a arr=( 0 2 4 6 8 )

#	# Functions:
#
function _variadic {
	while [[ -n $1 ]]; do
		print $1
		shift
	done
}

 ######
# main #
 ######

_variadic Mary had a little lamb
echo
_variadic ${arr[@]}
Output:

Mary had a little lamb

0 2 4 6

8

Lambdatalk

Lambdas are de facto variadic in lambdatalk

{def foo 
 {lambda {:s}  // :s will get any sequence of words
  {S.first :s}
  {if {S.empty? {S.rest :s}} then else {foo {S.rest :s}}}}}
-> foo

{foo hello brave new world} 
-> hello brave new world 

{foo {S.serie 1 10}} 
-> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Lang

fp.printAll = (&values...) -> {
	fn.arrayForEach(&values, fn.println)
}

fp.printAll(1, 2, 3)
# 1
# 2
# 3

fp.printAll() # No output

fp.printAll(abc, def, xyz)
# abc
# def
# xyz

# Array un-packing
&arr $= [1, abc, xyz, 42.42f]
fp.printAll(&arr...)
# 1
# abc
# xyz
# 42.42

fp.printAll(&arr..., last)
# 1
# abc
# xyz
# 42.42
# last

fp.printAll(first, &arr...)
# first
# 1
# abc
# xyz
# 42.42

Solution with the use of arguments auto-pack operator and combinator function:

fp.printAllComb $= -|fn.combC(fn.arrayForEach, fn.println)

fp.printAllComb(42, 2, abc)
# 42
# 2
# abc

fp.printAllComb() # No output

&arr $= [1, abc, xyz, 42.42f]
fp.printAllComb(&arr...)
# 1
# abc
# xyz
# 42.42

Lasso

A Lasso method parameter name can prefixed by "..." to specify a variable number of parameters, which are made available as a staticarray. If no name is specified, the staticarray will be named "rest".

define printArgs(...items) => stdoutnl(#items)
define printEachArg(...) => with i in #rest do stdoutnl(#i)

printArgs('a', 2, (:3))
printEachArg('a', 2, (:3))

To expand an existing list, pass it to the method using invocation syntax.

local(args = (:"Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"))
printEachArg(:#args)

Output:

staticarray(a, 2, staticarray(3))
a
2
staticarray(3)
Rosetta
Code
Is
Awesome!

Works with: UCB Logo

UCB Logo allows four classes of arguments (in order):

  1. 0 or more required inputs (colon prefixed words)
  2. 0 or more optional inputs (two member lists: colon prefixed word with default value)
  3. an optional "rest" input (a list containing a colon prefixed word, set to the list of remaining arguments)
  4. ...with an optional default arity (a number)
to varargs [:args]
 foreach :args [print ?]
end

(varargs "Mary "had "a "little "lamb)
apply "varargs [Mary had a little lamb]

Lua

The generic syntax for defining a variadic function is appending an ellipsis to the list of arguments:

function varar(...)
  for i, v in ipairs{...} do print(v) end
end

It is then used like so:

varar(1, "bla", 5, "end");
Output:
1
bla
5
end

When used with runtime arrays, the unpack function must be called on the array, otherwise the array itself will be used as the only argument:

local runtime_array = {1, "bla", 5, "end"};

varar(unpack(runtime_array));

M2000 Interpreter

Each function has own stack of values. We can Read arguments from there, using a Read statement or we can check stack or do anything to it. This stack erased when function exit. We can use parenthesis in the name or not. When we use parentesis we can put some arguments, but interpreter make a Read statement with these arguments.

Function Variadic() {...} is the same as Function Variadic {...} and Function Variadic () {...}.

Function Abc(x, y) {...} is the same as Function Abc {Read x, y : ... }

We can use Read at some point after some statement executed in Abc function. We can check the stack before the Read to find the type of values in function's stack. This stack isn't the return or process stack.

Module's have stack too, but calling a module from module pass the same stack. This hold if we call function using Call statement.

Module CheckIt {
      \\ Works for numbers and strings (letters in M2000)
      Function Variadic {
            \\ print a letter for each type in function stack
            Print Envelope$()
            \\Check types using Match
            Print Match("NNSNNS")
            =stack.size
            While not Empty {
                  if islet then {print letter$} else print number
            }
      }
      M=Variadic(1,2,"Hello",3,4,"Bye")
      Print M
      \\ K is a poiner to Array
      K=(1,2,"Hello 2",3,4,"Bye 2")
      \\ !K pass all items to function's stack
      M=Variadic(!K)
}
Checkit


Module CheckIt2 {
      Function Variadic {
            \\ [] return a pointer to stack, and leave a new stack as function's stack
            a=[]
            \\ a is a pointer to stack
            \\ objects just leave a space, and cursor move to next column (spread on lines)
            Print a
      }
      M=Variadic(1,2,"Hello",3,4,"Bye")
      Print M
      \\ K is a poiner to Array
      K=(1,2,"Hello 2",3,4,"Bye 2")
      \\ !K pass all items to function stack
      M=Variadic(!K)
}
Checkit2

M4

define(`showN',
   `ifelse($1,0,`',`$2
$0(decr($1),shift(shift($@)))')')dnl
define(`showargs',`showN($#,$@)')dnl
dnl
showargs(a,b,c)
dnl
define(`x',`1,2')
define(`y',`,3,4,5')
showargs(x`'y)

Output (with tracing):

m4trace: -1- showargs(a, b, c)
a
b
c



m4trace: -1- showargs(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
1
2
3
4
5

Mathematica/Wolfram Language

Function that takes 0 to infinite arguments and prints the arguments:

ShowMultiArg[x___] := Do[Print[i], {i, {x}}]

Example:

ShowMultiArg[]
ShowMultiArg[a, b, c]
ShowMultiArg[5, 3, 1]

gives back:

[nothing]

a
b
c

5
3
1

In general Mathematica supports patterns in functions, mostly represented by the blanks and sequences: _, __ and ___ . With those you can create functions with variable type and number of arguments.

MATLAB

In MATLAB, the keyword "varargin" in the argument list of a function denotes that function as a variadic function. This keyword must come last in the list of arguments. "varargin" is actually a cell-array that assigns a comma separated list of input arguments as elements in the list. You can access each of these elements like you would any normal cell array.

function variadicFunction(varargin)

    for i = (1:numel(varargin))
        disp(varargin{i});
    end
    
end

Sample Usage:

>> variadicFunction(1,2,3,4,'cat')
     1

     2

     3

     4

cat

Maxima

show([L]) := block([n], n: length(L), for i from 1 thru n do disp(L[i]))$

show(1, 2, 3, 4);

apply(show, [1, 2, 3, 4]);

/* Actually, the built-in function "disp" is already what we want */
disp(1, 2, 3, 4);

apply(disp, [1, 2, 3, 4]);

Metafont

Variable number of arguments to a macro can be done using the text keyword identifying the kind of argument to the macro. In this way, each argument can be of any kind (here, as example, I show all the primitive types that Metafont knows)

def print_arg(text t) =
for x = t:
  if unknown x: message "unknown value"
  elseif numeric x: message decimal x
  elseif string x: message x
  elseif path x: message "a path"
  elseif pair x: message decimal (xpart(x)) & ", " & decimal (ypart(x))
  elseif boolean x: if x: message "true!" else: message "false!" fi
  elseif pen x: message "a pen"
  elseif picture x: message "a picture"
  elseif transform x: message "a transform" fi; endfor enddef;

print_arg("hello", x, 12, fullcircle, currentpicture, down, identity, false, pencircle);
end

Modula-3

Modula-3 provides the built ins FIRST and LAST, which can be used with FOR loops to cycle over all elements of an array. This, combined with open arrays allows Modula-3 to simulate variadic functions.

MODULE Varargs EXPORTS Main;

IMPORT IO;

VAR strings := ARRAY [1..5] OF TEXT {"foo", "bar", "baz", "quux", "zeepf"};

PROCEDURE Variable(VAR arr: ARRAY OF TEXT) =
  BEGIN
    FOR i := FIRST(arr) TO LAST(arr) DO
      IO.Put(arr[i] & "\n");
    END;
  END Variable;
  
BEGIN
  Variable(strings);
END Varargs.

Output:

foo
bar
baz
quux
zeepf

Things get more complicated if you want to mix types:

MODULE Varargs EXPORTS Main;

IMPORT IO, Fmt;

VAR 
  strings := NEW(REF TEXT);
  ints := NEW(REF INTEGER);
  reals := NEW(REF REAL);
  refarr := ARRAY [1..3] OF REFANY {strings, ints, reals};

PROCEDURE Variable(VAR arr: ARRAY OF REFANY) =
  BEGIN
    FOR i := FIRST(arr) TO LAST(arr) DO
      TYPECASE arr[i] OF
      | REF TEXT(n) => IO.Put(n^ & "\n");
      | REF INTEGER(n) => IO.Put(Fmt.Int(n^) & "\n");
      | REF REAL(n) => IO.Put(Fmt.Real(n^) & "\n");
      ELSE (* skip *)
      END;
    END;
  END Variable;
  
BEGIN
  strings^ := "Rosetta"; ints^ := 1; reals^ := 3.1415;
  Variable(refarr);
END Varargs.

Output:

Rosetta
1
3.1415

Nemerle

Translation of: C#

Like C#, Nemerle uses the params keyword to specify that arguments are collected into an array.

using System;
using System.Console;

module Variadic
{
    PrintAll (params args : array[object]) : void
    {
        foreach (arg in args) WriteLine(arg);
    }
    
    Main() : void
    {
        PrintAll("test", "rosetta code", 123, 5.6, DateTime.Now);
    }
}

Nim

proc print(xs: varargs[string, `$`]) =
  for x in xs:
    echo x

The function can be called with any number of arguments and the argument list can be constructed at runtime:

print(12, "Rosetta", "Code", 15.54321)

print 12, "Rosetta", "Code", 15.54321, "is", "awesome!"

let args = @["12", "Rosetta", "Code", "15.54321"]
print(args)

Objective-C

Objective-C uses the same varargs functionality as C. Like C, it has no way of knowing the number or types of the arguments. When the arguments are all objects, the convention is that, if the number of arguments is undetermined, then the list must be "terminated" with nil. Functions that follow this convention include the constructors of data structures that take an undetermined number of elements, like [NSArray arrayWithObjects:...].

#include <stdarg.h>

void logObjects(id firstObject, ...) // <-- there is always at least one arg, "nil", so this is valid, even for "empty" list
{
  va_list args;
  va_start(args, firstObject);
  id obj;
  for (obj = firstObject; obj != nil; obj = va_arg(args, id))
    NSLog(@"%@", obj);
  va_end(args);
}

// This function can be called with any number or type of objects, as long as you terminate it with "nil":
logObjects(@"Rosetta", @"Code", @"Is", @"Awesome!", nil);
logObjects(@4, @3, @"foo", nil);

OCaml

OCaml's strong type system makes writing variadic functions complex, as there is no 'a... -> 'b type. In general, writing a function that takes a list as argument is the best practice :

let rec print = function
  | [] -> ()
  | x :: xs -> print_endline x; print xs

(* Or better yet *)
let print = List.iter print_endline

let () =
  print [];
  print ["hello"; "world!"]

If you really need a true variadic function, there are a few ways to make it work. The first is to specify the function's type with its first argument using a generalized algebraic data type (GADT) :

type 'a variadic =
  | Z : unit variadic
  | S : 'a variadic -> (string -> 'a) variadic

let rec print : type a. a variadic -> a = function
  | Z -> ()
  | S v -> fun x -> Format.printf "%s\n" x; print v

let () =
  print Z;                              (* no arguments *)
  print (S Z) "hello";                  (* one argument *)
  print (S (S (S Z))) "how" "are" "you" (* three arguments *)

You can even specify different types with more GADT constructors:

type 'a variadic =
  | Z : unit variadic
  | U : 'a variadic -> (unit -> 'a) variadic
  | S : 'a variadic -> (string -> 'a) variadic
  | I : 'a variadic -> (int -> 'a) variadic
  | F : 'a variadic -> (float -> 'a) variadic
  (* Printing of a general type, takes pretty printer as argument *)
  | G : 'a variadic -> (('t -> unit) -> 't -> 'a) variadic
  | L : 'a variadic -> (('t -> unit) -> 't list -> 'a) variadic

let rec print : type a. a variadic -> a = function
  | Z -> ()
  | U v -> fun () -> Format.printf "()\n"; print v
  | S v -> fun x -> Format.printf "%s\n" x; print v
  | I v -> fun x -> Format.printf "%d\n" x; print v
  | F v -> fun x -> Format.printf "%f\n" x; print v
  | G v -> fun pp x -> pp x; print v
  | L v -> fun pp x -> List.iter pp x; print v

let () =
  print (S (I (S Z))) "I am " 5 "Years old";
  print (S (I (S (L (S Z))))) "I have " 3 " siblings aged " (print (I Z)) [1;3;7]

This is what the Format.printf functions do. The only difference is that the compiler constructs the GADT term from the given format string. This is why you can only call them with an explicit string argument, and not a variable of type string.

Another method uses continuation passing style (CPS) :

let print f = f ()
let arg value () cont = cont (Format.printf "%s\n" value)
let stop a = a

let () = 
  print stop;
  print (arg "hello") (arg "there") stop;

(* use a prefix operator for arg *)
let (!) = arg

let () = 
  print !"hello" !"hi" !"its" !"me" stop

This isn't really a variadic function though, it's a hack that looks like one. The work is being done in the arg function, not print.

Other example (sequential composition or Lisp-like apply).

type ('f,'g) t =
  | Z : ('f,'f) t
  | S : 'a -> (('a -> 'f), ('f,'g) t -> 'g) t

let rec apply: type f g. f -> (f,g) t -> g =
  fun k t -> match t with
  | Z -> k (* type g = f *)
  | S x -> apply (k x) (* type g = (f,g) t -> g *)

let (!) x = S x (* prefix *)

(* top level *)
# apply List.map !(fun x -> x+1) ![1;2;3] Z

Oforth

As Oforth uses a data stack, the only way to have a function using a variable number of parameters is to define one of its parameters as the number of parameters to use on the stack.

For instance :

: sumNum(n)  | i | 0 n loop: i [ + ] ;
Output:
sumNum(3, 1, 2, 3) println
6
sumNum(2, 1, 4) println
5
sumNum(5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) println
25

Oz

This is only possible for methods, not for functions/procedures.

declare
  class Demo from BaseObject
     meth test(...)=Msg
        {Record.forAll Msg Show}
     end
  end

  D = {New Demo noop}
  Constructed = {List.toTuple test {List.number 1 10 1}}
in
  {D test(1 2 3 4)}
  {D Constructed}

PARI/GP

A variadic function can be coded directly in PARI using the parser code s*.

Works with: PARI/GP version 2.8+
f(a[..])=for(i=1,#a,print(a[i]))
Works with: PARI/GP version 2.8.1+
call(f, v)

Pascal

Standard Pascal does not allow variadic functions.

See Free Pascal instead.

Perl

Functions in Perl 5 don't have argument lists. All arguments are stored in the array @_ anyway, so there is variable arguments by default.

sub print_all {
  foreach (@_) {
    print "$_\n";
  }
}

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

print_all(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
print_all(4, 3, 5);
print_all("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");

Since lists are flattened when placed in a list context, you can just pass an array in as an argument and all its elements will become separate arguments:

@args = ("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");
print_all(@args);

Introduced experimentally in 5.20.0, subroutines can have signatures when the feature is turned on:

use 5.020;
use experimental 'signatures';

Perl policy states that all bets are off with experimental features—their behavior is subject to change at any time, and they may even be removed completely (this feature will most likely stay in, but expect changes in the future that will break any scripts written using it as it stands in 5.20.1).

Functions can be declared with fixed arity:

sub print ($x, $y) {
    say $x, "\n", $y;
}

But this can easily be converted to a variadic function with a slurpy parameter:

sub print_many ($first, $second, @rest) {
    say "First: $first\n"
       ."Second: $second\n"
       ."And the rest: "
       . join("\n", @rest);
}

It is valid for the @rest array to be empty, so this is also an optional parameter (see Optional parameters).

Phix

Library: Phix/basics

Copy of Euphoria. The argument to print_args could be anything constructed at runtime. You can also specify optional parameters, simply by specifying a default value. Any non-optional arguments must be grouped together at the start.

procedure print_args(sequence args)
    for i=1 to length(args) do
        ?args[i]
    end for
end procedure
print_args({"Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb"})

Phixmonti

def varfunc
	1 tolist flatten
	len for
		get print nl
	endfor	
enddef


"Mary" "had" "a" "little" "lamb" 5 tolist varfunc

PHP

PHP 4 and above supports varargs. You can deal with the argument list using the func_num_args(), func_get_arg(), and func_get_args() functions.

<?php
function printAll() {
  foreach (func_get_args() as $x) // first way
    echo "$x\n";

  $numargs = func_num_args(); // second way
  for ($i = 0; $i < $numargs; $i++)
    echo func_get_arg($i), "\n";
}
printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
printAll(4, 3, 5);
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");
?>

You can use the call_user_func_array function to apply it to a list of arguments:

<?php
$args = array("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");
call_user_func_array('printAll', $args);
?>
Works with: PHP version 5.6+

You can receive variable arguments in a list by having a parameter preceded by ...:

<?php
function printAll(...$things) {
  foreach ($things as $x)
    echo "$x\n";
}
printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
printAll(4, 3, 5);
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");
?>

You can use the same ... syntax to supply a list of arguments to a function:

<?php
$args = ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"];
printAll(...$args);
?>

PicoLisp

The '@' operator causes a function to accept a variable number of arguments. These can be accesed with the 'args', 'next', 'arg' and 'rest' functions.

(de varargs @
   (while (args)
      (println (next)) ) )

The '@' operator may be used in combination with normal parameters:

(de varargs (Arg1 Arg2 . @)
   (println Arg1)
   (println Arg2)
   (while (args)
      (println (next)) ) )

It is called like any other function

(varargs 'a 123 '(d e f) "hello")

also by possibly applying it to a ready-made list

(apply varargs '(a 123 (d e f) "hello"))

Output in all cases:

a
123
(d e f)
"hello"

PL/I

/* PL/I permits optional arguments, but not an infinitely varying */
/* argument list: */
s: procedure (a, b, c, d);
   declare (a, b, c, d) float optional;
   if ^omitted(a) then put skip list (a);
   if ^omitted(b) then put skip list (b);
   if ^omitted(c) then put skip list (c);
   if ^omitted(d) then put skip list (d);
end s;

Plain English

The only built-in imperative in Plain English that has variadic arguments is the 'call' imperative:

Call [dll name] [dll function] with [a value] and [another value].

The number of arguments used in the statement varies on the number of arguments needed by the DLL function. Variadic functions cannot be user-defined.

PowerShell

function print_all {
    foreach ($x in $args) {
        Write-Host $x
    }
}

Normal usage of the function just uses all arguments one after another:

print_all 1 2 'foo'

In PowerShell v1 there was no elegant way of using an array of objects as arguments to a function which leads to the following idiom:

$array = 1,2,'foo'
Invoke-Expression "& print_all $array"

PowerShell v2 introduced the splat operator which makes this easier:

Works with: PowerShell version 2
print_all @array

Prolog

The Prolog standard does not require support for variadic functions, but there is no need for them in Prolog, because Prolog has first-class support for terms, including lists and terms such as (1,2,3), which are also known as comma-lists.

For example, the standard predicate write/1 has just one formal argument, but it will accept any term. Thus, except for the additional parentheses, write/1 is like a variadic function that requires at least one argument:

?- write( (1) ), nl.
1

?- write( (1,2,3) ), nl.
1,2,3

In practice, since the minimum length of a comma-list is 2, Prolog lists are often used instead of comma-lists to handle situations where vararg-behavior is wanted. For example:

printAll( List ) :- forall( member(X,List), (write(X), nl)).

To handle more esoteric situations, we could define a higher-order predicate to handle terms of arbitrary arity, e.g.

execute( Term ) :- 
  Term =.. [F | Args],
  forall( member(X,Args), (G =.. [F,X], G, nl) ).
?- execute( write(1,2,3) ).
1
2
3

Python

Putting * before an argument will take in any number of arguments and put them all in a tuple with the given name.

def print_all(*things):
    for x in things:
        print x

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

print_all(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3)
print_all(4, 3, 5)
print_all("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!")

You can use the same "*" syntax to apply the function to an existing list of arguments:

args = ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"]
print_all(*args)

Keyword arguments

Python also has keyword arguments were you can add arbitrary func(keyword1=value1, keyword2=value2 ...) keyword-value pairs when calling a function. This example shows both keyword arguments and positional arguments. The two calls to the function are equivalent. *alist spreads the members of the list to create positional arguments, and **adict does similar for the keyword/value pairs from the dictionary.

>>> def printargs(*positionalargs, **keywordargs):
	print "POSITIONAL ARGS:\n  " + "\n  ".join(repr(x) for x in positionalargs)
	print "KEYWORD ARGS:\n  " + '\n  '.join(
		"%r = %r" % (k,v) for k,v in keywordargs.iteritems())

	
>>> printargs(1,'a',1+0j, fee='fi', fo='fum')
POSITIONAL ARGS:
  1
  'a'
  (1+0j)
KEYWORD ARGS:
  'fee' = 'fi'
  'fo' = 'fum'
>>> alist = [1,'a',1+0j]
>>> adict = {'fee':'fi', 'fo':'fum'}
>>> printargs(*alist, **adict)
POSITIONAL ARGS:
  1
  'a'
  (1+0j)
KEYWORD ARGS:
  'fee' = 'fi'
  'fo' = 'fum'
>>>

See the Python entry in Named Arguments for a more comprehensive description of Python function parameters and call arguments.

Qi

Qi doesn't have support for variable argument functions, but we can fake it by using a macro that puts all arguments into a list.

(define varargs-func
  A -> (print A))

(define varargs
  [varargs | Args] -> [varargs-func [list | Args]]
  A -> A)

(sugar in varargs 1)

Quackery

A Quackery word can take a variable number of items from the stack, either by specifying the number of items on the top of stack, or by placing a marker on the stack underneath a number of items.

(oats: "one and the same" compares the identity of two items, ensuring that marker is uniquely identified.)

[ pack witheach 
    [ echo$ cr ] ]      is counted-echo$  ( $ ... n -->   )

[ this ]                is marker         (         --> m )

[ [] 
  [ swap dup marker oats 
   iff drop done
    nested swap join 
  again ] ]             is gather         ( m x ... --> [ )

[ gather witheach 
    [ echo$ cr ] ]      is markered-echo$ ( m $ ...  -->  )


$ "this" $ "is" $ "a" $ "formica" $ "table" 5 counted-echo$
cr 
marker $ "green" $ "is" $ "its" $ "colour" markered-echo$
Output:
this
is
a
formica
table

green
is
its
colour

R

This first function, almost completes the task, but the formatting isn't quite as specified.

 printallargs1 <- function(...) list(...)
 printallargs1(1:5, "abc", TRUE)
# [[1]]
# [1] 1 2 3 4 5
# 
# [[2]]
# [1] "abc"
# 
# [[3]]
# [1] TRUE

This function is corrrect, though a little longer.

 printallargs2 <- function(...) 
 {  
   args <- list(...)
   lapply(args, print)
   invisible()
 }
 printallargs2(1:5, "abc", TRUE)
# [1] 1 2 3 4 5
# [1] "abc"
# [1] TRUE

Use do.call to call a function with a list of arguments.

arglist <- list(x=runif(10), trim=0.1, na.rm=TRUE)
do.call(mean, arglist)

Racket

The following defines and uses an any-number-of-arguments variadic function called "vfun".

-> (define (vfun . xs) (for-each displayln xs))
-> (vfun)
-> (vfun 1)
1
-> (vfun 1 2 3 4)
1
2
3
4
-> (apply vfun (range 10 15))
10
11
12
13
14

Raku

(formerly Perl 6)

Works with: Rakudo version #25 "Minneapolis"

If a subroutine has no formal parameters but mentions the variables @_ or %_ in its body, it will accept arbitrary positional or keyword arguments, respectively. You can even use both in the same function.

sub foo {
   .say for @_;
   say .key, ': ', .value for %_;
}

foo 1, 2, command => 'buckle my shoe',
    3, 4, order => 'knock at the door';

This prints:

1
2
3
4
command: buckle my shoe
order: knock at the door

Raku also supports slurpy arrays and hashes, which are formal parameters that consume extra positional and keyword arguments like @_ and %_. You can make a parameter slurpy with the * twigil. This implementation of &foo works just like the last:

sub foo (*@positional, *%named) {
   .say for @positional;
   say .key, ': ', .value for %named;
}

Unlike in Perl 5, arrays and hashes aren't flattened automatically. Use the | operator to flatten:

foo |@ary, |%hsh;

RapidQ

RapidQ uses special keywords SUBI and FUNCTIONI for procedures and functions with variable number of parameters. Numeric parameters are accessed from array ParamVal and string parameters from array ParamStr$.

SUBI printAll (...)
    FOR i = 1 TO ParamValCount
	PRINT ParamVal(i)
    NEXT i
    FOR i = 1 TO ParamStrCount
	PRINT ParamStr$(i)
    NEXT i
END SUBI
 
printAll 4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3
printAll 4, 3, 5
printAll "Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"

REALbasic

This subroutine prints it arguments. ParamArrays must be the last argument but may be preceded by any number of normal arguments.

Sub PrintArgs(ParamArray Args() As String)
  For i As Integer = 0 To Ubound(Args)
    Print(Args(i))
  Next
End Sub

Calling the subroutine.

PrintArgs("Hello", "World!", "Googbye", "World!")

REBOL

REBOL does not have variadic functions, nevertheless, it is easy to define a function taking just one argument, an ARGS block. The ARGS block contents can then be processed one by one:

REBOL [
	Title: "Variadic Arguments"
]

print-all: func [
    args [block!] {the arguments to print}
] [
    foreach arg args [print arg]
]

print-all [rebol works this way]

REXX

simplistic

print_all:  procedure              /*   [↓]     is the # of args passed.*/
                           do j=1  for arg()
                           say  arg(j)
                           end   /*j*/
return

annotated

print_all:  procedure              /*   [↓]     is the # of args passed.*/
                           do j=1  for arg()
                           say  '[argument'   j"]: "   arg(j)
                           end   /*j*/
return

invocations

The function can be called with any number of arguments (including no arguments and/or omitted arguments),
although some REXX implementations impose a limit and the number of arguments.

call print_all .1,5,2,4,-3, 4.7e1, 013.000 ,, 8**2 -3, sign(-66), abs(-71.00), 8 || 9, 'seven numbers are prime, 8th is null'

call print_all  "One ringy-dingy,",
                "two ringy-dingy,",
                "three ringy-dingy...",
                "Hello?  This is Ma Bell.",
                "Have you been misusing your instrument?",
                "(Lily Tomlin routine)"

                         /*  [↑]   example showing multi-line arguments.*/

dynamically built argument list

/* REXX */
list=''
Do i=1 To 6
  list=list||'"arg"'i','
  End
list=list||'"end"'
Interpret 'call show' list
Exit
show:  procedure
do j=1 for arg()
  say  arg(j)
  end   /*j*/
return

Output:

arg1
arg2
arg3
arg4
arg5
arg6
end

Ring

# Project : Variadic function

sum([1,2])
sum([1,2,3])
nums = [1,2,3,4]
sum(nums)

func sum(nums)
       total = 0
       for num = 1 to len(nums)
           total = total + num
       next
       showarray(nums)
       see " " + total + nl
        
func showarray(vect)
       see "["
       svect = ""
       for n = 1 to len(vect)
           svect = svect + vect[n] + " "
       next
       svect = left(svect, len(svect) - 1)
       see "" + svect + "]"

Output:

[1 2] 3
[1 2 3] 6
[1 2 3 4] 10

RPL

Variable number of arguments are idiomatically passed through the stack, with the last argument specifying how many items shall be taken into account.

Works with: HP version 48G
≪ ""
   1 ROT START
      " " ROT + SWAP +
   END TAIL
≫ 'MKLINE' STO 
"Mary" "has" "a" "little" "lamb" 5 MKLINE
Output:
1: "Mary has a little lamb"

Ruby

The * is sometimes referred to as the "splat" in Ruby.

def print_all(*things)
  puts things
end

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

print_all(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3)
print_all(4, 3, 5)
print_all("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!")

You can use the same "*" syntax to apply the function to an existing list of arguments:

args = ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"]
print_all(*args)

Rust

// 20220106 Rust programming solution

macro_rules! print_all {
   ($($args:expr),*) => { $( println!("{}", $args); )* } 
}

fn main() {
   print_all!("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");
}

Output: Try it online!

Scala

def printAll(args: Any*) = args foreach println

Example:

scala> printAll(1,2,3, "Rosetta", "is cool")
1
2
3
Rosetta
is cool

scala> val list = List(1,2,3, "Rosetta", "is cool")
list: List[Any] = List(1, 2, 3, Rosetta, is cool)

scala> printAll(list: _*)
1
2
3
Rosetta
is cool

Scheme

Putting a dot before the last argument will take in any number of arguments and put them all in a list with the given name.

(define (print-all . things)
    (for-each
        (lambda (x) (display x) (newline))
        things))

Note that if you define the function anonymously using lambda, and you want all the args to be collected in one list (i.e. you have no parameters before the parameter that collects everything), then you can just replace the parentheses altogether with that parameter, as if to say, let this be the argument list:

(define print-all
  (lambda things
    (for-each
        (lambda (x) (display x) (newline))
        things)))

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

(print-all 4 3 5 6 4 3)
(print-all 4 3 5)
(print-all "Rosetta" "Code" "Is" "Awesome!")

The apply function will apply the function to a list of arguments:

(define args '("Rosetta" "Code" "Is" "Awesome!"))
(apply print-all args)

Sidef

A parameter declared with "*", can take any number of arguments of any type.

func print_all(*things) {
    things.each { |x| say x };
}

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

print_all(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
print_all(4, 3, 5);
print_all("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!");

Also, there is "..." which transforms an array into a list of arguments.

var args = ["Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!"];
print_all(args...);

Slate

Putting an asterisk before a method's input variable header name means it will contain all non-core input variables (those are prefixed with a colon) in an Array.

define: #printAll -> [| *rest | rest do: [| :arg | inform: arg printString]].

printAll applyTo: #(4 3 5 6 4 3).
printAll applyTo: #('Rosetta' 'Code' 'Is' 'Awesome!').

For method definitions and message sends, the same mechanism is employed, but the syntax for passing arguments after the message phrase is special (using commas to append arguments which fill *rest):

_@lobby printAll [| *rest | rest do: [| :arg | inform: arg printString]].
lobby printAll, 4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3.
lobby printAll, 'Rosetta', 'Code', 'Is', 'Awesome!'.

Swift

Using ... after the type of argument will take in any number of arguments and put them all in one array of the given type with the given name.

func printAll<T>(things: T...) {
  // "things" is a [T]
  for i in things {
    print(i)
  }
}

This function can be called with any number of arguments:

printAll(4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3)
printAll(4, 3, 5)
printAll("Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome!")

Tcl

Works with: Tcl version 8.5

If the last argument is named "args", it collects all the remaining arguments

proc print_all {args} {puts [join $args \n]}

print_all 4 3 5 6 4 3
print_all 4 3 5
print_all Rosetta Code Is Awesome!

set things {Rosetta Code Is Awesome!}

print_all $things ;# ==> incorrect: passes a single argument (a list) to print_all
print_all {*}$things ;# ==> correct: passes each element of the list to the procedure

The above code will work in all versions of Tcl except for the last line. A version-independent transcription of that (one of many possible) would be:

eval [list print_all] [lrange $things 0 end]

TIScript

In TIScript last parameter of function may have '..' added to its name. On call that parameter will contain an array of rest of arguments passed to that function.

function printAll(separator,argv..) {
  if(argv.length)
    stdout.print(argv[0]);
  for (var i=1; i < argv.length; i++)
    stdout.print(separator, argv[i]);
}
printAll(" ", 4, 3, 5, 6, 4, 3);
printAll(",", 4, 3, 5);
printAll("! ","Rosetta", "Code", "Is", "Awesome");

uBasic/4tH

It's not easy to make a variadic function or procedure in uBasic/4tH, but it is possible with a little effort, provided the stack is used. However, sometimes it is required to reverse the order of the values by loading them into the array, from high memory to low memory. Strings may require even more effort, but the built-in hashing helps.

Push _Mary, _had, _a, _little, _lamb   ' Push the hashes
Proc _PrintStrings (5)                 ' Print the string

Push 1, 4, 5, 19, 12, 3                ' Push the numbers
Print "Maximum is: ";FUNC(_Max(6))     ' Call the function

End


_PrintStrings Param(1)                 ' Print a variadic number of strings
  Local(1)

  For b@ = a@-1 To 0 Step -1           ' Reverse the hashes, load in array
    @(b@) = Pop()
  Next

  For b@ = 0 To a@-1                   ' Now call the appropriate subroutines
    Proc @(b@)
  Until b@ = a@-1
    Print " ";                         ' Print a space
  Next                                 ' unless it is the last word

  Print                                ' Terminate the string
Return


_Max Param(1)                          ' Calculate the maximum value
  Local(3)

  d@ = -(2^31)                         ' Set maximum to a tiny value

  For b@ = 1 To a@                     ' Get all values from the stack
    c@ = Pop()
    If c@ > d@ THEN d@ = c@            ' Change maximum if required
  Next
Return (d@)                            ' Return the maximum

                                       ' Hashed labels
_Mary   Print "Mary"; : Return
_had    Print "had"; : Return
_a      Print "a"; : Return
_little Print "little"; : Return
_lamb   Print "lamb"; : Return
Output:
Mary had a little lamb
Maximum is: 19

0 OK, 0:236

Unicon

See Icon.

Ursala

f = %gP*=

#show+

main = f <'foo',12.5,('x','y'),100>

f is defined as a function that takes a list of any length of items of any type, and uses a built-in heuristic to decide how to print them. All functions in the language are polymorphic and variadic unless specifically restricted to the contrary.

output:

'foo'
1.250000e+01
('x','y')
100

V

In V, all the arguments are passed in stack, and the stack is freely accessible so var args is the default to any level of functions

Using a count as the indication of number of arguments to extract,

[myfn
   [zero? not] [swap puts pred]
   while
].

100 200 300 400 500 3 myfn

results in:

500
400
300

Visual Basic

Works with: Visual Basic version 6
Option Explicit
'--------------------------------------------------
Sub varargs(ParamArray a())
Dim n As Long, m As Long
    Debug.Assert VarType(a) = (vbVariant Or vbArray)
    For n = LBound(a) To UBound(a)
        If IsArray(a(n)) Then
            For m = LBound(a(n)) To UBound(a(n))
                Debug.Print a(n)(m)
            Next m
        Else
            Debug.Print a(n)
        End If
    Next
End Sub
'--------------------------------------------------
Sub Main()
Dim v As Variant

    Debug.Print "call 1"
    varargs 1, 2, 3
    
    Debug.Print "call 2"
    varargs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    
    v = Array(9, 10, 11)
    Debug.Print "call 3"
    varargs v
    
    ReDim v(0 To 2)
    v(0) = 12
    v(1) = 13
    v(2) = 14
    Debug.Print "call 4"
    varargs 11, v
    
    Debug.Print "call 5"
    varargs v(2), v(1), v(0), 11
    
End Sub
Output:
call 1
 1 
 2 
 3 
call 2
 4 
 5 
 6 
 7 
 8 
call 3
 9 
 10 
 11 
call 4
 11 
 12 
 13 
 14 
call 5
 14 
 13 
 12 
 11

V (Vlang)

fn print_all(things ...string) {
    for x in things {
        println(x)
    }
}

Vorpal

Each method can have a variable-length parameter (VPL), indicated by empty brackets after the parameter name. The VLP (if present) will be replaced with an array containing all the extra arguments passed to the method. Effectively, extra arguments are absorbed into the array. Calling the function with fewer parameters than needed is still a runtime error. The VPL may be omitted, which will result in an empty array as the value of that parameter.

self.f = method(x, y[ ], z){
   x.print()
   for(i = 0, i < y.size(), i = i + 1){
      ('[' + y[i] + ']').print()
   }
   z.print()
}

self.f(1, 2, 3)
'---'.print()
self.f(1, 2, 3, 4)
'---'.print()
self.f(1, 2)

Wren

Wren doesn't support variadic functions and doesn't really need to as we can just write a function which takes one (or one more) argument and pass it a list.

var printArgs = Fn.new { |args| args.each { |arg| System.print(arg) } }

printArgs.call(["Mary", "had", "3", "little", "lambs"])
Output:
Mary
had
3
little
lambs

XLISP

(defun print-on-separate-lines (&rest xs)
    (for-each print xs))

; test the function:

(print-on-separate-lines 'i 'am 'doing 'a 'great 'work 'so 'that 'i 'cannot 'come 'down)

; to use it on a list of arguments assembled at run time, first create your list

(define test '(why should the work cease whilst i leave it and come down to you))

; and then call APPLY:

(apply print-on-separate-lines test)
Output:
I 
AM 
DOING 
A 
GREAT 
WORK 
SO 
THAT 
I 
CANNOT 
COME 
DOWN 
WHY 
SHOULD 
THE 
WORK 
CEASE 
WHILST 
I 
LEAVE 
IT 
AND 
COME 
DOWN 
TO 
YOU

XPL0

Passing an array is probably a better way to accomplish this task.

include c:\cxpl\codes;          \intrinsic 'code' declarations
def IntSize=4;                  \number of bytes in an integer

proc Var(N...);                 \Display N strings passed as arguments
int  N;
[N:= Reserve(N*IntSize);        \reserve space for N string pointers
repeat  Text(0,N(0)); CrLf(0);  \display strings pointed to by N(0)
        N:= N+IntSize;          \point to next string
until   N=GetHp;                \pointing beyond reserved space?
];

Var(4, "Mary", "had", "a", "little")

Output:

Mary
had
a
little

zkl

In zkl, all functions and methods are variadic (they are just passed a list).

fcn f{vm.arglist.apply2("println")}
f("Mary","had","a","little");
Output:
Mary
had
a
little
a:="This is a test".split(); //-->L("This","is","a","test")
f(a.xplode());  // xplode takes a list and blows it apart into call args
Output:
This
is
a
test
fcn g{f(vm.pasteArgs(2)}
g(a.xplode());

pasteArgs takes the passed in function args and stuffs them back into the arglist of the function call

Output:
a
test

Of course, parameter lists can be named, have defaults, etc. Using the arglist, as a list, isn't the usual case.