User:Treefall: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Blegh! Solving these problems is a good way to relieve insomnia. I'll be around until I get my valium prescription. |
Blegh! Solving these problems is a good way to relieve insomnia. I'll be around until I get my valium prescription. |
||
I do Mathematica here. Used to work with (in order of recency): MATLAB, Java, C++, C, QBasic. My main programming mode is mostly procedural and functional. I haven't had much use for oop and event-driven programming in my daily work with math simulations. |
I do Mathematica here. Used to work with (in order of recency): MATLAB, Java, C++, C, QBasic. My main programming mode is mostly procedural and functional. I haven't had much use for oop and event-driven programming in my daily work with math simulations. I am currently working on effective concurrent computing. So yeah, I would love to see more tasks that require parallelism. |
||
PS: In the battle between Mathematica and MATLAB, MATLAB loses...hard. That is all. |
PS: In the battle between Mathematica and MATLAB, MATLAB loses...hard. That is all. |
||
Revision as of 10:21, 27 July 2010
Blegh! Solving these problems is a good way to relieve insomnia. I'll be around until I get my valium prescription. I do Mathematica here. Used to work with (in order of recency): MATLAB, Java, C++, C, QBasic. My main programming mode is mostly procedural and functional. I haven't had much use for oop and event-driven programming in my daily work with math simulations. I am currently working on effective concurrent computing. So yeah, I would love to see more tasks that require parallelism.
PS: In the battle between Mathematica and MATLAB, MATLAB loses...hard. That is all.