Two sum

From Rosetta Code
Two sum is a draft programming task. It is not yet considered ready to be promoted as a complete task, for reasons that should be found in its talk page.
This task has been clarified. Its programming examples are in need of review to ensure that they still fit the requirements of the task.


Task

Given a sorted array of integers (with possibly duplicates), is it possible to find a pair of integers from that array that sum up to a given sum? If so, return indices of the two integers or an empty array if not. The solution is not necessarily unique.


Example

Given numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90], sum = 21,
Because numbers[1] + numbers[3] = 2 + 19 = 21,
return [1, 3].


Source

Stack Overflow: Find pair of numbers in array that add to given sum

11l

Translation of: Python

<lang 11l>F two_sum(arr, num)

  V i = 0
  V j = arr.len - 1
  L i < j
     I arr[i] + arr[j] == num
        R [i, j]
     I arr[i] + arr[j] < num
        i++
     E
        j--
  R [Int]()

V numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] print(two_sum(numbers, 21)) print(two_sum(numbers, 25))</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[]

Action!

<lang Action!>PROC PrintArray(INT ARRAY a INT len)

 INT i
 Put('[)
 FOR i=0 TO len-1
 DO
   PrintI(a(i))
   IF i<len-1 THEN
     Put(' )
   FI
 OD
 Put(']) PutE()

RETURN

PROC PrintPairs(INT ARRAY a INT len,sum)

 INT i,j,p1,p2,s,count
 count=0
 FOR i=0 TO len-2
 DO
   p1=a(i)
   FOR j=i+1 TO len-1
   DO
     p2=a(j)
     s=p1+p2
     IF s=sum THEN
       PrintF("(%I,%I) ",i,j)
       count==+1
     ELSEIF s>sum THEN
       EXIT
     FI
   OD
 OD
 IF count=0 THEN
   Print("none")
 FI
 PutE()

RETURN

PROC Test(INT ARRAY a INT len,sum)

 Print("Array: ") PrintArray(a,len)
 Print("Sum:   ") PrintIE(sum)
 Print("Pairs: ") PrintPairs(a,len,sum)
 PutE()

RETURN

PROC Main()

 INT ARRAY a=[0 2 11 19 90]
 INT ARRAY b=[0 2 3 3 4 11 17 17 18 19 90]
 Test(a,5,21)
 Test(a,5,22)
 Test(b,11,21)

RETURN</lang>

Output:

Screenshot from Atari 8-bit computer

Array: [0 2 11 19 90]
Sum:   21
Pairs: (1,3)

Array: [0 2 11 19 90]
Sum:   22
Pairs: none

Array: [0 2 3 3 4 11 17 17 18 19 90]
Sum:   21
Pairs: (1,9) (2,8) (3,8) (4,6) (4,7)

Aime

<lang aime>integer i, u, v; index x; list l;

l_bill(l, 0, 0, 2, 11, 19, 90);

for (i, u in l) {

   x[u] = i;
   if (i_jack(v, x, 21 - u)) {
       o_(v, " ", i, "\n");
       break;
   }

}</lang>

Output:
1 3

ALGOL 68

Translation of: Lua

<lang algol68># returns the subscripts of a pair of numbers in a that sum to sum, a is assumed to be sorted #

  1. if there isn't a pair of numbers that summs to sum, an empty array is returned #

PRIO TWOSUM = 9; OP TWOSUM = ( []INT a, INT sum )[]INT:

    BEGIN
       BOOL found := FALSE;
       INT i := LWB a;
       INT j := UPB a;
       WHILE i < j AND NOT found DO
           INT s = a[ i ] + a[ j ];
           IF s = sum THEN
               found  := TRUE
           ELIF s < sum THEN
               i +:= 1
           ELSE
               j -:= 1
           FI
       OD;
       IF found THEN ( i, j ) ELSE () FI
    END # TWOSUM # ;
  1. test the TWOSUM operator #

PROC print twosum = ( []INT a, INT sum )VOID:

    BEGIN
        []INT pair = a[ AT 0 ] TWOSUM sum;
        IF LWB pair > UPB pair THEN
            # no pair with the required sum #
            print( ( "[]", newline ) )
        ELSE
            # have a pair #
            print( ( "[", whole( pair[ LWB pair ], 0 ), ", ", whole( pair[ UPB pair ], 0 ), "]", newline ) )
        FI
    END # print twosum # ; 

print twosum( ( 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 ), 21 ); # should be [1, 3] # print twosum( ( -8, -2, 0, 1, 5, 8, 11 ), 3 ); # should be [0, 6] (or [1, 4]) # print twosum( ( -3, -2, 0, 1, 5, 8, 11 ), 17 ); # should be [] # print twosum( ( -8, -2, -1, 1, 5, 9, 11 ), 0 ) # should be [2, 3] #</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[0, 6]
[]
[2, 3]

APL

Works with Dyalog APL.

∘.+⍨ ⍺ makes a table that is the outer sum of the left argument (the numbers).

We want to remove the diagonal, to avoid edge cases. We can achieve this by setting all these numbers to an arbitrary decimal value, since two integers can't sum to a decimal.

≢⍺ is the length of the numbers. ⍳≢⍺ creates an array from 0 to the length of the numbers. ∘.=⍳≢⍺ returns an identity matrix of size ≢⍺ (using the outer product with the equality function). ⍸ returns the indices of these numbers. 0.1@ sets that list to 0.1.

Then, we just need to find where the right argument (the target) is equal to the matrix, get the indices, and return the first one (⊃). <lang APL> ⎕io ← 0 ⍝ sets index origin to 0 ts ← {⊃⍸ ⍵= 0.1@(⍸∘.=⍨⍳≢⍺) ∘.+⍨ ⍺} ⎕ ← 0 2 11 19 90 ts 21 ⍝ should be 1 3 </lang>

Output:
1 3

AppleScript

Functional

Translation of: JavaScript
Translation of: Haskell


Nesting concatMap or (>>=) (flip concatMap) yields the cartesian product of the list with itself. Skipping products where the y index is lower than the x index (see the use of 'drop' below) ignores the 'lower triangle' of the cartesian grid, excluding mirror-image and duplicate number pairs.

Note that this draft assumes that the task and target output are specified in terms of the prevailing convention of zero-based indices.

AppleScript, unusually, happens to make internal use of one-based indices, rigid adherence to which would, of course, in this case, simply produce the wrong result :-)

<lang AppleScript>-------------------------- TWO SUM -------------------------

-- twoSum :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Int)] on twoSum(n, xs)

   set ixs to zip(enumFromTo(0, |length|(xs) - 1), xs)
   
   script ijIndices
       on |λ|(ix)
           set {i, x} to ix
           
           script jIndices
               on |λ|(jy)
                   set {j, y} to jy
                   
                   if (x + y) = n then
                       Template:I, j
                   else
                       {}
                   end if
               end |λ|
           end script
           
           |>>=|(drop(i + 1, ixs), jIndices)
       end |λ|
   end script
   
   |>>=|(ixs, ijIndices)

end twoSum



TEST --------------------------

on run

   twoSum(21, [0, 2, 11, 19, 90])
   
   --> Template:1, 3 Single solution.

end run



GENERIC FUNCTIONS --------------------

-- (>>=) :: Monad m => m a -> (a -> m b) -> m b on |>>=|(xs, f)

   concat(map(f, xs))

end |>>=|

-- concat :: a -> [a] | [String] -> String on concat(xs)

   script append
       on |λ|(a, b)
           a & b
       end |λ|
   end script
   
   if length of xs > 0 and class of (item 1 of xs) is string then
       set empty to ""
   else
       set empty to {}
   end if
   foldl(append, empty, xs)

end concat

-- drop :: Int -> a -> a on drop(n, a)

   if n < length of a then
       if class of a is text then
           text (n + 1) thru -1 of a
       else
           items (n + 1) thru -1 of a
       end if
   else
       {}
   end if

end drop

-- enumFromTo :: Int -> Int -> [Int] on enumFromTo(m, n)

   if m > n then
       set d to -1
   else
       set d to 1
   end if
   set lst to {}
   repeat with i from m to n by d
       set end of lst to i
   end repeat
   return lst

end enumFromTo

-- foldl :: (a -> b -> a) -> a -> [b] -> a on foldl(f, startValue, xs)

   tell mReturn(f)
       set v to startValue
       set lng to length of xs
       repeat with i from 1 to lng
           set v to |λ|(v, item i of xs, i, xs)
       end repeat
       return v
   end tell

end foldl

-- length :: [a] -> Int on |length|(xs)

   length of xs

end |length|

-- map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] on map(f, xs)

   tell mReturn(f)
       set lng to length of xs
       set lst to {}
       repeat with i from 1 to lng
           set end of lst to |λ|(item i of xs, i, xs)
       end repeat
       return lst
   end tell

end map

-- min :: Ord a => a -> a -> a on min(x, y)

   if y < x then
       y
   else
       x
   end if

end min

-- Lift 2nd class handler function into 1st class script wrapper -- mReturn :: Handler -> Script on mReturn(f)

   if class of f is script then
       f
   else
       script
           property |λ| : f
       end script
   end if

end mReturn

-- zip :: [a] -> [b] -> [(a, b)] on zip(xs, ys)

   set lng to min(length of xs, length of ys)
   set lst to {}
   repeat with i from 1 to lng
       set end of lst to {item i of xs, item i of ys}
   end repeat
   return lst

end zip</lang>

Output:

<lang AppleScript>Template:1, 3</lang>


Idiomatic

Like the "Functional" script above, this returns multiple solutions when they're found. However it assumes a sorted list, as per the clarified task description, which allows some optimisation of the search. Also, the indices returned are 1-based, which is the AppleScript norm.

<lang applescript>on twoSum(givenNumbers, givenSum)

   script o
       property lst : givenNumbers
       property output : {}
   end script
   
   set listLength to (count o's lst)
   repeat with i from 1 to (listLength - 1)
       set n1 to item i of o's lst
       repeat with j from (i + 1) to listLength
           set thisSum to n1 + (item j of o's lst)
           if (thisSum = givenSum) then
               set end of o's output to {i, j}
           else if (thisSum > givenSum) then
               exit repeat
           end if
       end repeat
   end repeat
   
   return o's output

end twoSum

-- Test code: twoSum({0, 2, 11, 19, 90}, 21) -- Task-specified list. twoSum({0, 3, 11, 19, 90}, 21) -- No matches. twoSum({-44, 0, 0, 2, 10, 11, 19, 21, 21, 21, 65, 90}, 21) -- Multiple solutions.</lang>

Output:

<lang applescript>Template:2, 4 {} {{1, 11}, {2, 8}, {2, 9}, {2, 10}, {3, 8}, {3, 9}, {3, 10}, {4, 7}, {5, 6}}</lang>

AutoHotkey

<lang AutoHotkey>TwoSum(a, target){ i := 1, j := a.MaxIndex() while(i < j){ if (a[i] + a[j] = target) return i ", " j else if (a[i] + a[j] < target) i++ else if (a[i] + a[j] > target) j-- } return "not found" }</lang> Examples:<lang AutoHotkey>MsgBox % TwoSum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21) ; returns 2, 4 (first index is 1 not 0)</lang>

Outputs:

2,4

AWK

<lang AWK>

  1. syntax: GAWK -f TWO_SUM.AWK

BEGIN {

   numbers = "0,2,11,19,90"
   print(two_sum(numbers,21))
   print(two_sum(numbers,25))
   exit(0)

} function two_sum(numbers,sum, arr,i,j,s) {

   i = 1
   j = split(numbers,arr,",")
   while (i < j) {
     s = arr[i] + arr[j]
     if (s == sum) {
       return(sprintf("[%d,%d]",i,j))
     }
     else if (s < sum) {
       i++
     }
     else {
       j--
     }
   }
   return("[]")

} </lang>

Output:
[2,4]
[]

Befunge

<lang befunge>>000pv

    >&:0\`#v_00g:1+00p6p

v >$&50p110p020p v>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+50g-!#v_48*10g8p10g1+:00g1-`v > v >10g20g..@ v_v """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""v ">"p4\"v"p02:+1p4\">":g02$< :

                                              >  20g8p20g1+:00g1-`#v_0     ^1

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " 0 >^ l p

                                                                   i        "
                                                                   a        ^
                                                                   F        "
                                                                   "        \
                                                                   >:#,_@   8
                                                                            p
                                                                            > ^</lang>

There are a couple of caveats due to limitations of the language. The target cannot be above 127, there can be no more than 47 elements in the list and the list must be delimited by a negative number before the target value as follows:

0 2 11 19 90 -1 21
Output:
1 3

C

<lang C>

  1. include<stdio.h>

int main() { int arr[5] = {0, 2, 11, 19, 90},sum = 21,i,j,check = 0;

for(i=0;i<4;i++){ for(j=i+1;j<5;j++){ if(arr[i]+arr[j]==sum){ printf("[%d,%d]",i,j); check = 1; break; } } }

if(check==0) printf("[]");

return 0; } </lang> Output :

[1,3]

C#

<lang csharp>using System; using System.Collections.Generic;

public class Program {

   public static void Main(string[] args)
   {
       int[] arr = { 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 };
       const int sum = 21;
       var ts = TwoSum(arr, sum);
       Console.WriteLine(ts != null ? $"{ts[0]}, {ts[1]}" : "no result");
       Console.ReadLine();
   }
   public static int[] TwoSum(int[] numbers, int sum)
   {
       var map = new Dictionary<int, int>();
       for (int i = 0; i < numbers.Length; i++)
       {
           // see if the complement is stored
           var key = sum - numbers[i];
           if (map.ContainsKey(key))
           {
               return new[] { map[key], i };
           }
           map.Add(numbers[i], i);
       }
       return null;
   }

} </lang>

Output:
1, 3

C++

Translation of: C#

<lang cpp>#include <iostream>

  1. include <map>
  2. include <tuple>
  3. include <vector>

using namespace std;

pair<int, int> twoSum(vector<int> numbers, int sum) { auto m = map<int, int>(); for (size_t i = 0; i < numbers.size(); ++i) { // see if the complement is stored auto key = sum - numbers[i];

if (m.find(key) != m.end()) { return make_pair(m[key], i); } m[numbers[i]] = i; }

return make_pair(-1, -1); }

int main() { auto numbers = vector<int>{ 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 }; const int sum = 21;

auto ts = twoSum(numbers, sum); if (ts.first != -1) { cout << "{" << ts.first << ", " << ts.second << "}" << endl; } else { cout << "no result" << endl; }

return 0; }</lang>

Output:
{1,3}

D

<lang D>import std.stdio;

void main() {

   const arr = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90];
   const sum = 21;
   writeln(arr.twoSum(21));

}

/**

* Searches arr for two indexes whose value adds to sum, and returns those indexes.
* Returns an empty array if no such indexes exist.
* The values of arr are assumed to be sorted.
*/

int[] twoSum(const int[] arr, const int sum) in {

   import std.algorithm.sorting : isSorted;
   assert(arr.isSorted);

} out(result) {

   assert(result.length == 0 || arr[result[0]] + arr[result[1]] == sum);

} body {

   int i=0;
   int j=arr.length-1;
   while (i <= j) {
       auto temp = arr[i] + arr[j];
       if (temp == sum) {
           return [i, j];
       }
       if (temp < sum) {
           i++;
       } else {
           j--;
       }
   }
   return [];

}</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]

Dart

<lang> main() {

 var a = [1,2,3,4,5];
 var s=25,c=0;
 var z=(a.length*(a.length-1))/2;
  for (var x = 0; x < a.length; x++) {
  print(a[x]);
  }
for (var x = 0; x < a.length; x++) {
   for(var y=x+1;y< a.length; y++)
   {
     if(a[x]+a[y]==s)
     {
       print([a[x],a[y]]);
       break;
     }
     else
     {
      c++; 
     }
   }
}

if(c==z) {

print("such pair doesn't exist");   

} }


</lang>

Delphi

Translation of: Python

<lang Delphi> program Two_Sum;

{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}

uses

 System.SysUtils,
 System.Generics.Collections;

function TwoSum(arr: TArray<Integer>; num: Integer; var i, j: integer): boolean; begin

 TArray.Sort<Integer>(arr);
 i := 0;
 j := Length(arr) - 1;
 while i < j do
 begin
   if arr[i] + arr[j] = num then
     exit(True);
   if arr[i] + arr[j] < num then
     inc(i)
   else
     Dec(j);
 end;
 Result := false;

end;

var

 i, j: Integer;

begin

 if TwoSum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21, i, j) then
   Writeln('(', i, ',', j, ')');
 if TwoSum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 25, i, j) then
   Writeln('(', i, ',', j, ')');
 Readln;

end.</lang>

Output:
(1,3)

Elixir

<lang elixir>defmodule RC do

 def two_sum(numbers, sum) do
   Enum.with_index(numbers) |>
   Enum.reduce_while([], fn {x,i},acc ->
     y = sum - x
     case Enum.find_index(numbers, &(&1 == y)) do
       nil -> {:cont, acc}
       j   -> {:halt, [i,j]}
     end
   end)
 end

end

numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] IO.inspect RC.two_sum(numbers, 21) IO.inspect RC.two_sum(numbers, 25)</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[]

F#

<lang fsharp> // Two Sum : Nigel Galloway December 5th., 2017 let fN n i =

 let rec fN n e =
   match n with
   |n::g when n < i -> match List.mapi(fun g i-> (n,i,g)) g |> List.tryFind(fun (n,g,l)->(n+g)=i) with
                       |Some (n,g,l) -> [e;e+l+1]
                       |_            -> fN g (e+1)
   |_               -> []
 fN n 0

printfn "%A" (fN [0; 2; 11; 19; 90] 21) </lang>

Output:
[1; 3]

Factor

<lang factor>USING: combinators fry kernel locals math prettyprint sequences ; IN: rosetta-code.two-sum

two-sum ( seq target -- index-pair )
   0 seq length 1 - :> ( x! y! ) [
       x y [ seq nth ] bi@ + :> sum {
           { [ sum target = x y = or ] [ f ] }
           { [ sum target > ] [ y 1 - y! t ] }
           [ x 1 + x! t ]
       } cond
   ] loop
   x y = { } { x y } ? ;
   

{ 21 55 11 } [ '[ { 0 2 11 19 90 } _ two-sum . ] call ] each</lang>

Output:
{ 1 3 }
{ }
{ 0 2 }

Forth

Works with: Gforth version 0.7.3

<lang forth>CREATE A CELL ALLOT

A[] ( n -- A[n]) CELLS A @ + @ ;
NONAME 1- ;
NONAME R> DROP R> DROP TRUE ;
NONAME SWAP 1+ SWAP ;

CREATE VTABLE , , ,

CMP ( n n' -- -1|0|1) - DUP IF DUP ABS / THEN ;
(TWOSUM) ( addr n n' -- u1 u2 t | f)
  >R SWAP A !  0 SWAP 1-  ( lo hi) ( R: n')
  BEGIN OVER OVER < WHILE 
    OVER A[]  OVER A[]  + R@
    CMP  1+ CELLS VTABLE + @ EXECUTE
  REPEAT
  DROP DROP R> DROP FALSE ;
TWOSUM ( addr n n' --) [CHAR] [ EMIT
  (TWOSUM) IF SWAP 0 .R [CHAR] , EMIT SPACE 0 .R THEN
  [CHAR] ] EMIT ;   

CREATE TEST0 0 , 2 , 11 , 19 , 90 , DOES> 5 ; CREATE TEST1 -8 , -2 , 0 , 1 , 5 , 8 , 11 , DOES> 7 ; TEST0 21 TWOSUM CR TEST0 25 TWOSUM CR TEST1 3 TWOSUM CR TEST1 8 TWOSUM CR BYE</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[]
[0, 6]
[2, 5]

Fortran

<lang fortran>program twosum

 implicit none
 integer, parameter, dimension(5) :: list = (/ 0, 2, 11, 19, 90/)
 integer, parameter :: target_val = 21
 integer :: nelem
 integer :: i, j
 logical :: success = .false.
 nelem = size(list)
 outer:do i = 1,nelem
    do j = i+1,nelem
       success = list(i) + list(j) == target_val
       if (success) exit outer
    end do
 end do outer
 if (success) then
    !Just some fancy formatting for nicer output
    print('("(",2(i3.1,1X),")",3(A1,i3.1))'), i,j, ":", list(i), "+", list(j), "=", target_val
 else
    print*, "Failed"
 end if

end program twosum </lang>

Output:
(  2   4 ):  2+ 19= 21

FreeBASIC

<lang freebasic>' FB 1.05.0 Win64

' "a" is the array of sorted non-negative integers ' "b" is the array to contain the result and is assumed to be empty initially

Sub twoSum (a() As UInteger, b() As Integer, targetSum As UInteger)

 Dim lb As Integer = LBound(a)
 Dim ub As Integer = UBound(a)
 If ub = -1 Then Return   empty array
 Dim sum As UInteger
 For i As Integer = lb To ub - 1
   If a(i) <= targetSum Then
     For j As Integer = i + 1 To ub
       sum = a(i) + a(j)
       If sum = targetSum Then
         Redim b(0 To 1)
         b(0) = i : b(1) = j
         Return
       ElseIf sum > targetSum Then
         Exit For
       End If
     Next j
   Else
     Exit For 
   End If
 Next i

End Sub

Dim a(0 To 4) As UInteger = {0, 2, 11, 19, 90} Dim b() As Integer Dim targetSum As UInteger = 21 twoSum a(), b(), targetSum If UBound(b) = -1 Then

 Print "No two numbers were found whose sum is "; targetSum

Else

 Print "The numbers with indices"; b(LBound(b)); " and"; b(UBound(b)); " sum to "; targetSum

End If Print Print "Press any number to quit" Sleep</lang>

Output:
The numbers with indices 1 and 3 sum to 21

Go

Translation of: Kotlin

<lang go>package main

import "fmt"

func twoSum(a []int, targetSum int) (int, int, bool) {

   len := len(a)
   if len < 2 {
       return 0, 0, false
   }
   for i := 0; i < len - 1; i++ {
       if a[i] <= targetSum {
           for j := i + 1; j < len; j++ {
               sum := a[i] + a[j]
               if sum == targetSum {
                   return i, j, true
               }
               if sum > targetSum {
                   break
               }
           }
       } else {
           break
       }
   }
   return 0, 0, false

}

func main() {

   a := []int {0, 2, 11, 19, 90}
   targetSum := 21
   p1, p2, ok := twoSum(a, targetSum)
   if (!ok) {
       fmt.Println("No two numbers were found whose sum is", targetSum)
   } else {
       fmt.Println("The numbers with indices", p1, "and", p2, "sum to", targetSum)
   }

}</lang>

Output:
The numbers with indices 1 and 3 sum to 21

Haskell

Returning first match

<lang Haskell>twoSum::(Num a,Ord a) => a -> [a] -> [Int] twoSum num list = sol ls (reverse ls)

 where
 ls = zip list [0..]
 sol [] _ = []
 sol _ [] = []
 sol xs@((x,i):us) ys@((y,j):vs) = ans
   where
   s = x + y
   ans | s == num  = [i,j]
       | j <= i    = []
       | s < num   = sol (dropWhile ((<num).(+y).fst) us) ys
       | otherwise = sol xs $ dropWhile ((num <).(+x).fst) vs

main = print $ twoSum 21 [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]</lang>

Output:
[1,3]

Returning all matches

Listing multiple solutions (as zero-based indices) where they exist:

<lang haskell>sumTo :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Int)] sumTo n ns =

 let ixs = zip [0 ..] ns
  in ixs
       >>= ( \(i, x) ->
               drop (succ i) ixs
                 >>= \(j, y) ->
                   [ (i, j)
                     | (x + y) == n
                   ]
           )

main :: IO () main = mapM_ print $ sumTo 21 [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10]</lang>

Or, resugaring a little – pulling more into the scope of the list comprehension: <lang Haskell>sumTo :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Int)] sumTo n ns =

 let ixs = zip [0 ..] ns
 in [ (i, j)
    | (i, x) <- ixs 
    , (j, y) <- drop (succ i) ixs
    , (x + y) == n ]

main :: IO () main = mapM_ print $ sumTo 21 [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10]</lang>

Output:
(1,3)
(2,5)

Icon and Unicon

Translation of: Lua

Icon and Unicon are ordinal languages, first index is one.

fullimag library used to pretty print lists.

<lang unicon>#

  1. twosum.icn, find two array elements that add up to a given sum
  2. Dedicated to the public domain

link fullimag procedure main(arglist)

   sum := pop(arglist) | 21
   L := []
   if *arglist > 0 then every put(L, integer(!arglist)) & L := sort(L)
   else L := [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]
   write(sum)
   write(fullimage(L))
   write(fullimage(twosum(sum, L)))

end

  1. assume sorted list, only interested in zero or one solution

procedure twosum(sum, L)

   i := 1
   j := *L
   while i < j do {
       try := L[i] + L[j]
       if try = sum then return [i,j]
       else
           if try < sum then
               i +:= 1
           else
               j -:= 1
   }
   return []

end</lang>

Output:
$ unicon -s twosum.icn -x
21
[0,2,11,19,90]
[2,4]

J

So, first off, our basic approach will be to find the sums: <lang J> =+/~0 2 11 19 90

0  2  11  19  90
2  4  13  21  92

11 13 22 30 101 19 21 30 38 109 90 92 101 109 180</lang>

And, check if any of them are our desired value: <lang J> 21=+/~0 2 11 19 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0</lang>

Except, we want indices here, so let's toss the structure so we can get those: <lang J> ,21=+/~0 2 11 19 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  I.,21=+/~0 2 11 19 90

8 16</lang>

Except, we really needed that structure - in this case, since we had a five by five table, we want to interpret this result as a base five pair of numbers:

<lang J> $21=+/~0 2 11 19 90 5 5

  5 5#:I.,21=+/~0 2 11 19 90

1 3 3 1</lang>

Or, taking advantage of being able to use verbs to represent combining their results, when we use three of them: <lang J> ($ #: I.@,)21=+/~0 2 11 19 90 1 3 3 1</lang>

But to be more like the other task implementations here, we don't want all the results, we just want zero or one result. We can't just take the first result, though, because that would fill in a 0 0 result if there were none, and 0 0 could have been a valid result which does not make sense for the failure case. So, instead, let's package things up so we can add an empty to the end and take the first of those:

<lang J> ($ <@#: I.@,)21=+/~0 2 11 19 90 ┌───┬───┐ │1 3│3 1│ └───┴───┘

  a:,~($ <@#: I.@,)21=+/~0 2 11 19 90

┌───┬───┬┐ │1 3│3 1││ └───┴───┴┘

  {.a:,~($ <@#: I.@,)21=+/~0 2 11 19 90

┌───┐ │1 3│ └───┘

  ;{.a:,~($ <@#: I.@,)21=+/~0 2 11 19 90

1 3</lang>

Finally, let's start pulling our arguments out using that three verbs combining form:

<lang J>  ;{.a:,~($ <@#: I.@,) 21([ = +/~@])0 2 11 19 90 1 3

  ;{.a:,~21 ($ <@#: I.@,)@([ = +/~@])0 2 11 19 90

1 3</lang>

a: is not a verb, but we can use a noun as the left verb of three as an implied constant verb whose result is itself: <lang J>  ;{. 21 (a:,~ ($ <@#: I.@,)@([ = +/~@]))0 2 11 19 90 1 3</lang>

And, let's finish the job, give this a name, and test it out: <lang J> twosum=: ;@{.@(a:,~ ($ <@#: I.@,)@([ = +/~@]))

  21 twosum 0 2 11 19 90

1 3</lang>

Except that looks like a bit of a mess. A lot of the reason for this is that ascii is ugly to look at. (Another issue, though, is that a lot of people are not used to architecting control flow as expressions.)

So... let's do this over again, using a more traditional implementation where we name intermediate results. (We're going to stick with our architecture, though, because changing the architecture to the more traditional approach would change the space/time tradeoff to require more time.)

<lang J>two_sum=:dyad define

 sums=. +/~ y
 matches=.  x = sums
 sum_inds=. I. , matches
 pair_inds=. ($matches) #: sum_inds
 ; {. a: ,~ <"1 pair_inds

)</lang>

And, testing:

<lang J> 21 two_sum 0 2 11 19 90 1 3</lang>

Or, we could go slightly more traditional and instead of doing that boxing at the end, use an if/else statement:

<lang J>two_sum=:dyad define

 sums=. +/~ y
 matches=.  x = sums
 sum_inds=. I. , matches
 pair_inds=. ($matches) #: sum_inds
 if. #pair_inds do.
   {.pair_inds
 else.
   i.0
 end.

)</lang>

Then again, most people don't read J anyways, so maybe just stick with the earlier implementation:

<lang J>twosum=: ;@{.@(a:,~ ($ <@#: I.@,)@([ = +/~@]))</lang>

Alternative approach

An alternative method for identifying and returning non-duplicate indicies of the pairs follows.

<lang j> 21 (= +/~) 0 2 11 19 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0</lang> The array is symmetrical so we can zero one half to remove duplicate pairs and then retrieve the remaining indicies using sparse array functionality. <lang j>zeroLowerTri=: * [: </~ i.@# getIdx=: 4 $. $. twosum_alt=: getIdx@zeroLowerTri@(= +/~)</lang>

Testing ... <lang j> 21 twosum_alt 0 2 11 19 90 1 3</lang>

Java

Translation of: Lua

<lang java>import java.util.Arrays;

public class TwoSum {

   public static void main(String[] args) {
       long sum = 21;
       int[] arr = {0, 2, 11, 19, 90};
       System.out.println(Arrays.toString(twoSum(arr, sum)));
   }
   public static int[] twoSum(int[] a, long target) {
       int i = 0, j = a.length - 1;
       while (i < j) {
           long sum = a[i] + a[j];
           if (sum == target)
               return new int[]{i, j};
           if (sum < target) i++;
           else j--;
       }
       return null;
   }

}</lang>

[1, 3]

JavaScript

ES5

Nesting concatMap yields the cartesian product of the list with itself, and functions passed to Array.map() have access to the array index in their second argument. Returning [] where the y index is lower than or equal to the x index ignores the 'lower triangle' of the cartesian grid, skipping mirror-image and duplicate number pairs. Returning [] where a sum condition is not met similarly acts as a filter – all of the empty lists in the map result are eliminated by the concat.

<lang JavaScript>(function () {

   var concatMap = function (f, xs) {
       return [].concat.apply([], xs.map(f))
   };
   return function (n, xs) {
       return concatMap(function (x, ix) {
           return concatMap(function (y, iy) {
               return iy <= ix ? [] : x + y === n ? [
                   [ix, iy]
               ] : []
           }, xs)
       }, xs)
   }(21, [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]);

})(); </lang>

Output:

<lang JavaScript>1,3</lang>

ES6

Composing a solution from generic functions like zip, bind (>>=, or flip concatMap) etc.

Translation of: Haskell

<lang JavaScript>(() => {

   'use strict';
   // SUMTWO ----------------------------------------------------------------
   // sumTwo :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Int)]
   function sumTwo(n, xs) {
       const ixs = zip(enumFromTo(0, length(xs) - 1), xs);
       return bind(ixs,
           ([i, x]) => bind(drop(i + 1, ixs),
               ([j, y]) => (x + y === n) ? [
                   [i, j]
               ] : []
           )
       );
   };
   // GENERIC FUNCTIONS -----------------------------------------------------
   // bind (>>=) :: [a] -> (a -> [b]) -> [b]
   const bind = (xs, f) => [].concat.apply([], xs.map(f));
   // drop :: Int -> [a] -> [a]
   const drop = (n, xs) => xs.slice(n);
   // enumFromTo :: Int -> Int -> [Int]
   const enumFromTo = (m, n) =>
       Array.from({
           length: Math.floor(n - m) + 1
       }, (_, i) => m + i);
   // length :: [a] -> Int
   const length = xs => xs.length;
   // show :: a -> String
   const show = (...x) =>
       JSON.stringify.apply(
           null, x.length > 1 ? [x[0], null, x[1]] : x
       );
   // zip :: [a] -> [b] -> [(a,b)]
   const zip = (xs, ys) =>
       xs.slice(0, Math.min(xs.length, ys.length))
       .map((x, i) => [x, ys[i]]);


   // TEST ------------------------------------------------------------------
   return show(
       sumTwo(21, [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10])
   );

})();</lang>

Output:
[[1,3],[2,5]]

Jsish

Based on Javascript entry. <lang javascript>/* Two Sum, in Jsish */ function twoSum(target, list) {

   var concatMap = function (f, xs) {
       return [].concat.apply([], xs.map(f));
   };
   return function (n, xs) {
       return concatMap(function (x, ix) {
           return concatMap(function (y, iy) {
               return iy <= ix ? [] : x + y === n ? [
                   [ix, iy]
               ] : [];
           }, xs);
       }, xs);
   }(target, list);

}

var list = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90];

list;
twoSum(21, list);
list[twoSum(21, list)[0][0]];
list[twoSum(21, list)[0][1]];</lang>
Output:
prompt$ jsish --U twoSum.jsi
list ==> [ 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 ]
twoSum(21, list) ==> [ [ 1, 3 ] ]
list[twoSum(21, list)[0][0]] ==> 2
list[twoSum(21, list)[0][1]] ==> 19

jq

Works with: jq

Works with gojq, the Go implementation of jq.

Translation of: Julia

<lang jq>def twosum($s):

 . as $v
 | {i: 0, j: ($v|length - 1) }
 | until( .i >= .j  or  $v[.i] + $v[.j] == $s;
     if $v[.i] + $v[.j] < $s then .i += 1
     else .j -= 1
     end)
 | if .i >= .j then [] else [.[]] end ;  # as required

[0, 2, 11, 19, 90] | (twosum(21), twosum(25)) </lang>

Output:
[1,3]
[]

Julia

Works with: Julia version 0.6
Translation of: Python

<lang julia>function twosum(v::Vector, s)

   i = 1
   j = length(v)
   while i < j
       if v[i] + v[j] == s
           return [i, j]
       elseif v[i] + v[j] < s
           i += 1
       else
           j -= 1
       end
   end
   return similar(v, 0)

end

@show twosum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21)</lang>

Output:
twosum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21) = [2, 4]

Kotlin

<lang scala>// version 1.1

fun twoSum(a: IntArray, targetSum: Int): Pair<Int, Int>? {

   if (a.size < 2) return null
   var sum: Int
   for (i in 0..a.size - 2) {
       if (a[i] <= targetSum) {
           for (j in i + 1..a.size - 1) {
               sum = a[i] + a[j]
               if (sum == targetSum) return Pair(i, j)
               if (sum > targetSum) break
           }
       } else {
           break
       }
   }
   return null

}

fun main(args: Array<String>) {

   val a = intArrayOf(0, 2, 11, 19, 90)
   val targetSum = 21
   val p = twoSum(a, targetSum)
   if (p == null) {
       println("No two numbers were found whose sum is $targetSum")
   } else {
       println("The numbers with indices ${p.first} and ${p.second} sum to $targetSum")
   }

}</lang>

Output:
The numbers with indices 1 and 3 sum to 21

Liberty BASIC

<lang liberty basic>myArray(0) = 0 myArray(1) = 2 myArray(2) = 11 myArray(3) = 19 myArray(4) = 90

sum = 21

Print twoToSum$("myArray", sum, 0, 4) End

Function twoToSum$(arrayName$, targetSum, minElement, maxElement)

   i = minElement : j = maxElement
   While (i < j)
       Select Case
           Case (Eval(arrayName$;"(";i;")") + Eval(arrayName$;"(";j;")")) < targetSum
               i = (i + 1)
           Case (Eval(arrayName$;"(";i;")") + Eval(arrayName$;"(";j;")")) > targetSum
               j = (j - 1)
           Case Else
               twoToSum$ = "[";i;",";j;"]"
               Exit Function
       End Select
   Wend
       twoToSum$ = "[]"

End Function</lang>

Output:
[1,3]

Lua

Lua uses one-based indexing. <lang lua>function twoSum (numbers, sum)

   local i, j, s = 1, #numbers
   while i < j do
       s = numbers[i] + numbers[j]
       if s == sum then
           return {i, j}
       elseif s < sum then
           i = i + 1
       else
           j = j - 1
       end
   end
   return {}

end

print(table.concat(twoSum({0,2,11,19,90}, 21), ","))</lang>

Output:
2,4

Maple

<lang Maple>two_sum := proc(arr, sum) local i,j,temp: i,j := 1,numelems(arr): while (i < j) do temp := arr[i] + arr[j]: if temp = sum then return [i,j]: elif temp < sum then i := i + 1: else j := j-1: end if: end do: return []: end proc: L := Array([0,2,2,11,19,19,90]); two_sum(L, 21);</lang>

Output:

Note that Maple does 1 based indexing.

[2,5]

Mathematica / Wolfram Language

<lang Mathematica>ttwoSum[data_List, sum_] :=

Block[{indices = Subsets[Range@Length@data, {2}]},
 Cases[indices, _?(Total@data# == sum &)]]

twoSum[{0, 2, 11, 19, 90}, 21] // TableForm</lang>

Output:

2 4

MiniScript

<lang MiniScript>twoSum = function(numbers, sum)

   // Make a map of values to their indices in the numbers array
   // as we go, so we will know when we've found a match.
   map = {}
   for i in numbers.indexes
       key = sum - numbers[i]
       if map.hasIndex(key) then return [map[key], i]
       map[numbers[i]] = i
   end for

end function

print twoSum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21)</lang>

Output:

[1, 3]

Modula-2

<lang modula2>MODULE TwoSum; FROM FormatString IMPORT FormatString; FROM Terminal IMPORT WriteString,ReadChar;

TYPE

   Pair = RECORD
       f,s : INTEGER;
   END;

PROCEDURE TwoSum(CONST arr : ARRAY OF INTEGER; CONST sum : INTEGER) : Pair; VAR i,j,temp : INTEGER; BEGIN

   i := 0;
   j := HIGH(arr)-1;
   WHILE i<=j DO
       temp := arr[i] + arr[j];
       IF temp=sum THEN
           RETURN Pair{i,j};
       END;
       IF temp<sum THEN
           INC(i);
       ELSE
           DEC(j);
       END;
   END;
   RETURN Pair{-1,-1};

END TwoSum;

VAR

   buf : ARRAY[0..63] OF CHAR;
   arr : ARRAY[0..4] OF INTEGER;
   res : Pair;

BEGIN

   arr[0]:=0;
   arr[1]:=2;
   arr[2]:=11;
   arr[3]:=19;
   arr[4]:=90;
   res := TwoSum(arr, 21);
   FormatString("[%i, %i]\n", buf, res.f, res.s);
   WriteString(buf);
   ReadChar;

END TwoSum.</lang>

Nim

<lang nim>proc twoSum(src: openarray[int], target: int): array[2, int] =

 if src.len < 2: 
   return
 for base in 0 .. (src.len - 2):
   for ext in (base + 1) ..< src.len:
     if src[base] + src[ext] == target:
       result[0] = base
       result[1] = ext


proc main =

 var data0 = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]
 var res = twoSum(data0, 21)
 assert(res == [1, 3])
 var data1 = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]
 res = twoSum(data1, 22)
 assert(res == [0, 0])
 var data2 = [1]
 res = twoSum(data2, 22)
 assert(res == [0, 0])
 var data3 = [1, 99]
 res = twoSum(data3, 100)
 assert(res == [0, 1])
 var data4 = [1, 99]
 res = twoSum(data4, 101)
 assert(res == [0, 0])


main()</lang>

Objeck

Translation of: Java

<lang objeck>class TwoSum {

 function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil {
   sum := 21;
   arr := [0, 2, 11, 19, 90];
   Print(TwoSum(arr, sum));
 }
 function : TwoSum(a : Int[], target : Int) ~ Int[] {
   i := 0;
   j := a->Size() - 1;
   while (i < j) {
     sum := a[i] + a[j];
     if(sum = target) {
       r := Int->New[2];
       r[0] := i;
       r[1] := j;
       return r;
     };
     if (sum < target) {
       i++;
     }
     else {
       j--;
     };
   };
   
   return Nil;
 }
 function : Print(r : Int[]) ~ Nil {
   '['->Print();
   each(i : r) {
     r[i]->Print();
     if(i + 1 < r->Size()) {
       ','->Print();
     };
   };
   ']'->PrintLine();
 }

} </lang>

Output:

[1,3]

OCaml

Translation of: C

<lang ocaml>let get_sums ~numbers ~sum =

 let n = Array.length numbers in
 let res = ref [] in
 for i = 0 to n - 2 do
   for j = i + 1 to n - 1 do
     if numbers.(i) + numbers.(j) = sum then
       res := (i, j) :: !res
   done
 done;
 !res


let () =

 let numbers = [| 0; 2; 11; 19; 90 |]
 and sum = 21
 in
 let res = get_sums ~numbers ~sum in
 List.iter (fun (i, j) ->
   Printf.printf "# Found: %d %d\n" i j
 ) res</lang>

Will return all possible sums, not just the first one found.

Output:
$ ocaml two_sum.ml
# Found: 1 3

ooRexx

<lang oorexx>a=.array~of( -5, 26, 0, 2, 11, 19, 90) x=21 n=0 do i=1 To a~items

 Do j=i+1 To a~items
   If a[i]+a[j]=x Then Do
     Say '['||i-1||','||j-1||']'
     n=n+1
     End
   End
 End

If n=0 Then

 Say '[] - no items found'      </lang>
Output:
[0,1]
[3,5]

Pascal

A little bit lengthy. Implemented an unsorted Version with quadratic runtime too and an extra test case with 83667 elements that needs 83667*86666/2 ~ 3.5 billion checks ( ~1 cpu-cycles/check, only if data in cache ). <lang pascal>program twosum; {$IFDEF FPC}{$MODE DELPHI}{$ELSE}{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}{$ENDIF} uses

 sysutils;

type

 tSolRec = record
             SolRecI,
             SolRecJ : NativeInt;
           end;  
 tMyArray = array of NativeInt;

const // just a gag using unusual index limits

 ConstArray :array[-17..-13] of NativeInt = (0, 2, 11, 19, 90);

function Check2SumUnSorted(const A :tMyArray;

                                sum:NativeInt;
                          var   Sol:tSolRec):boolean;

//Check every possible sum A[max] + A[max-1..0] //than A[max-1] + A[max-2..0] etc pp. //quadratic runtime: maximal (max-1)*max/ 2 checks //High(A) always checked for dynamic array, even const //therefore run High(A) to low(A), which is always 0 for dynamic array label

 SolFound;

var

 i,j,tmpSum: NativeInt;

Begin

 Sol.SolRecI:=0;
 Sol.SolRecJ:=0;
 i := High(A);
 while i > low(A) do
 Begin
   tmpSum := sum-A[i]; 
   j := i-1;
   while j >= low(A) do
   begin
     //Goto is bad, but fast...
     if tmpSum = a[j] Then  
       GOTO SolFound;
     dec(j);
   end;  
   dec(i);
 end;
 result := false;
 exit;

SolFound:

 Sol.SolRecI:=j;Sol.SolRecJ:=i;
 result := true;      

end;

function Check2SumSorted(const A :tMyArray;

                               sum:NativeInt;
                        var    Sol:tSolRec):boolean;

var

 i,j,tmpSum: NativeInt;

Begin

 Sol.SolRecI:=0;
 Sol.SolRecJ:=0;
 i := low(A);
 j := High(A);
 while(i < j) do
 Begin
   tmpSum := a[i] + a[j];
   if tmpSum = sum then  
   Begin
     Sol.SolRecI:=i;Sol.SolRecJ:=j;
     result := true;      
     EXIT;
   end;   
   if tmpSum < sum then 
   begin
     inc(i);
     continue;
   end;
   //if tmpSum > sum then     
   dec(j);
 end;
 writeln(i:10,j:10);  
 result := false;

end;

var

 Sol :tSolRec;
 CheckArr : tMyArray;
 MySum,i : NativeInt;
 

Begin

 randomize;
 setlength(CheckArr,High(ConstArray)-Low(ConstArray)+1);
 For i := High(CheckArr) downto low(CheckArr) do
   CheckArr[i] := ConstArray[i+low(ConstArray)];  
 MySum  := 21;  
 IF Check2SumSorted(CheckArr,MySum,Sol) then
   writeln('[',Sol.SolRecI,',',Sol.SolRecJ,'] sum to ',MySum)
 else
   writeln('No solution found'); 
    
 //now test a bigger sorted array..
 setlength(CheckArr,83667);
 For i := High(CheckArr) downto 0 do
   CheckArr[i] := i;  
 MySum := CheckArr[Low(CheckArr)]+CheckArr[Low(CheckArr)+1];
 writeln(#13#10,'Now checking array of ',length(CheckArr),
         ' elements',#13#10);
 //runtime about 1 second
 IF Check2SumUnSorted(CheckArr,MySum,Sol) then
   writeln('[',Sol.SolRecI,',',Sol.SolRecJ,'] sum to ',MySum)
 else
   writeln('No solution found');  
 //runtime not measurable
 IF Check2SumSorted(CheckArr,MySum,Sol) then
   writeln('[',Sol.SolRecI,',',Sol.SolRecJ,'] sum to ',MySum)
 else
   writeln('No solution found');    

end.</lang>

Output:
[1,3] sum to 21

Now checking array of 83667 elements

[0,1] sum to 1
[0,1] sum to 1

real    0m1.013s

Perl

Translation of: Python

<lang perl>use strict; use warnings; use feature 'say';

sub two_sum{

 my($sum,@numbers) = @_;
 my $i = 0;
 my $j = $#numbers - 1;
 my @indices;
 while ($i < $j) {
   if    ($numbers[$i] + $numbers[$j] == $sum) { push @indices, ($i, $j); $i++; }
   elsif ($numbers[$i] + $numbers[$j]  < $sum) { $i++ }
   else                                        { $j-- }
 }
 return @indices

}

my @numbers = <0 2 11 19 90>; my @indices = two_sum(21, @numbers); say join(', ', @indices) || 'No match';

@indices = two_sum(25, @numbers); say join(', ', @indices) || 'No match';</lang>

Output:
1, 3
No match

Phix

function twosum(sequence s, integer t)
    for i=1 to length(s) do
        for j=i+1 to length(s) do
            if s[i]+s[j]=t then
                return {i,j}
            end if
        end for
    end for
    return {}
end function
?twosum({0, 2, 11, 19, 90},21)
Translation of: Raku
function twosum(sequence numbers, integer total)
integer i=1, j=length(numbers)
    while i<j do
        switch compare(numbers[i]+numbers[j],total) do
            case -1: i += 1
            case  0: return {i, j}
            case +1: j -= 1
        end switch
    end while
    return {}
end function
Output:

Phix uses 1-based indexes

{2,4}

Phixmonti

<lang Phixmonti>include ..\Utilitys.pmt

def two_sum /# arr num -- n #/

   var num
   1 var i
   len var j
   true
   while
       i get swap j get rot + >ps
       tps num == if
           ps> drop j get swap i get rot 2 tolist false
       else
           ps> num < if i 1 + var i else j 1 - var j endif true
       endif 
       i j < and
   endwhile
   len 2 > if drop ( ) endif

enddef

( 0 2 11 19 90 ) 21 two_sum ? 25 two_sum ?</lang>

Output:
[2, 19]
[]

=== Press any key to exit ===

PicoLisp

<lang PicoLisp>(de twosum (Lst N)

  (for  ((I . A) Lst  A  (cdr A))
     (T
        (for ((J . B) (cdr Lst)  B  (cdr B))
           (T (= N (+ (car A) (car B)))
              (cons I (inc J)) ) )
        @ ) ) )

(println

  (twosum (0 2 11 19 90) 21)
  (twosum (-3 -2 0 1 5 8 11) 17)
  (twosum (-8 -2 -1 1 5 9 11) 0) )</lang>
Output:
(2 . 4) NIL (3 . 4)

PowerShell

Lazy, very lazy. <lang PowerShell> $numbers = @(0, 2, 11, 19, 90) $sum = 21

$totals = for ($i = 0; $i -lt $numbers.Count; $i++) {

   for ($j = $numbers.Count-1; $j -ge 0; $j--)
   { 
       [PSCustomObject]@{
           FirstIndex  = $i
           SecondIndex = $j
           TargetSum   = $numbers[$i] + $numbers[$j]
       }
   }

}

$totals | Where-Object TargetSum -EQ $sum |

         Select-Object -First 1 `
                       -Property @{
                                       Name       = "Sum"
                                       Expression = { $_.TargetSum }
                                 },
                                 @{
                                       Name       = "Indices"
                                       Expression = { @($_.FirstIndex, $_.SecondIndex) }
                                 }

</lang>

Output:
Sum Indices
--- -------
 21 {1, 3} 

Python

Translation of: Raku

<lang python>def two_sum(arr, num):

   i = 0
   j = len(arr) - 1
   while i < j:
       if arr[i] + arr[j] == num:
           return (i, j)
       if arr[i] + arr[j] < num:
           i += 1
       else:
           j -= 1
   return None


numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] print(two_sum(numbers, 21)) print(two_sum(numbers, 25))</lang>

or, in terms of itertools.product:

Works with: Python version 3.7

<lang python>Finding two integers that sum to a target value.

from itertools import (product)


  1. sumTwo :: [Int] -> Int -> [(Int, Int)]

def sumTwo(xs):

   All the pairs of integers in xs which
      sum to n.
   
   def go(n):
       ixs = list(enumerate(xs))
       return [
           (fst(x), fst(y)) for (x, y) in (
               product(ixs, ixs[1:])
           ) if fst(x) < fst(y) and n == snd(x) + snd(y)
       ]
   return lambda n: go(n)


  1. TEST ----------------------------------------------------
  1. main :: IO ()

def main():

   Tests
   xs = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10]
   print(
       fTable(
           'The indices of any two integers drawn from ' + repr(xs) +
           '\nthat sum to a given value:\n'
       )(str)(
           lambda x: str(x) + ' = ' + ', '.join(
               ['(' + str(xs[a]) + ' + ' + str(xs[b]) + ')' for a, b in x]
           ) if x else '(none)'
       )(
           sumTwo(xs)
       )(enumFromTo(10)(25))
   )


  1. GENERIC -------------------------------------------------
  1. enumFromTo :: (Int, Int) -> [Int]

def enumFromTo(m):

   Integer enumeration from m to n.
   return lambda n: list(range(m, 1 + n))


  1. fst :: (a, b) -> a

def fst(tpl):

   First member of a pair.
   return tpl[0]


  1. snd :: (a, b) -> b

def snd(tpl):

   Second member of a pair.
   return tpl[1]


  1. DISPLAY -------------------------------------------------
  1. fTable :: String -> (a -> String) ->
  2. (b -> String) -> (a -> b) -> [a] -> String

def fTable(s):

   Heading -> x display function -> fx display function ->
                    f -> xs -> tabular string.
   
   def go(xShow, fxShow, f, xs):
       ys = [xShow(x) for x in xs]
       w = max(map(len, ys))
       return s + '\n' + '\n'.join(map(
           lambda x, y: y.rjust(w, ' ') + ' -> ' + fxShow(f(x)),
           xs, ys
       ))
   return lambda xShow: lambda fxShow: lambda f: lambda xs: go(
       xShow, fxShow, f, xs
   )


  1. MAIN ---

if __name__ == '__main__':

   main()</lang>
Output:
The indices of any two integers drawn from [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10]
that sum to a given value:

10 -> [(0, 5)] = (0 + 10)
11 -> [(0, 2)] = (0 + 11)
12 -> [(1, 5)] = (2 + 10)
13 -> [(1, 2)] = (2 + 11)
14 -> (none)
15 -> (none)
16 -> (none)
17 -> (none)
18 -> (none)
19 -> [(0, 3)] = (0 + 19)
20 -> (none)
21 -> [(1, 3), (2, 5)] = (2 + 19), (11 + 10)
22 -> (none)
23 -> (none)
24 -> (none)
25 -> (none)


or, a little more parsimoniously (not generating the entire cartesian product), in terms of concatMap:

Works with: Python version 3.7

<lang python>Finding two integers that sum to a target value.

from itertools import chain


  1. sumTwo :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Int)]

def sumTwo(n, xs):

   All the pairs of integers in xs which
      sum to n.
   
   def go(vs):
       return [vs[0]] if n == sum(vs[1]) else []
   ixs = list(enumerate(xs))
   return list(
       bind(ixs)(
           lambda ix: bind(ixs[ix[0]:])(
               lambda jy: go(tuple(zip(*(ix, jy))))
           )
       )
   )


  1. TEST ----------------------------------------------------
  1. main :: IO ()

def main():

   Tests
   for n in [21, 25]:
       print(
           sumTwo(n, [0, 2, 11, 19, 90, 10])
       )


  1. GENERIC -------------------------------------------------
  1. bind (>>=) :: [a] -> (a -> [b]) -> [b]

def bind(xs):

   List monad injection operator.
      Two computations sequentially composed,
      with any value produced by the first
      passed as an argument to the second.
   
   return lambda f: list(
       chain.from_iterable(
           map(f, xs)
       )
   )


if __name__ == '__main__':

   main()</lang>
Output:
[(1, 3), (2, 5)]
[]

Quackery

So… I initially misread the task as "return the two integers" and then realised it was "…the indices of…", but that's OK — it just meant writing an extra word to find the indices, given the numbers.

The last three lines of task are in case the two integers found by twosome are equal - in which case, as find finds the first instance in the array and the array is sorted, we can safely take the index plus one as the second index.

<lang Quackery> [ 0 peek ] is first ( [ --> n )

 [ -1 peek ]                   is last   (   [ --> n )
 [ 1 split nip ]               is top    (   [ --> [ )
 [ -1 split drop ]             is tail   (   [ --> [ )
 [ temp put
   [ dup size 2 < iff
       [ drop [] ] done 
     dup first over last +
     temp share - 
     dup 0 = iff
       [ drop dup first
         swap last join ] done
     0 < iff top else tail
     again ]
   temp release ]              is twosum ( [ n --> [ )
 [ over temp put
   twosum 
   [] swap
   witheach
     [ temp share find join ]
   temp release 
   dup [] != if
     [ dup unpack = if 
       [ behead 1+ join ] ] ]  is task   ( [ n --> [ )
 ' [ 0 2 11 19 20 ] 21 task echo cr
 ' [ 0 2 11 19 20 ] 25 task echo cr
 ' [ 0 2 12 12 20 ] 24 task echo cr</lang>
Output:
[ 1 3 ]
[ ]
[ 2 3 ]

Racket

<lang racket>#lang racket/base (define (two-sum v m)

 (let inr ((l 0) (r (sub1 (vector-length v))))
   (and
    (not (= l r))
    (let ((s (+ (vector-ref v l) (vector-ref v r))))
      (cond [(= s m) (list l r)] [(> s m) (inr l (sub1 r))] [else (inr (add1 l) r)])))))

(module+ test

 (require rackunit)
 ;; test cases
 ;; no output indicates returns are as expected
 (check-equal? (two-sum #( 0  2 11 19 90)      21) '(1 3))
 (check-equal? (two-sum #(-8 -2  0  1  5 8 11)  3) '(0 6))
 (check-equal? (two-sum #(-3 -2  0  1  5 8 11) 17) #f)
 (check-equal? (two-sum #(-8 -2 -1  1  5 9 11)  0) '(2 3)))</lang>

Raku

(formerly Perl 6)

Procedural

Translation of: zkl

<lang perl6>sub two_sum ( @numbers, $sum ) {

   die '@numbers is not sorted' unless [<=] @numbers;
   my ( $i, $j ) = 0, @numbers.end;
   while $i < $j {
       given $sum <=> @numbers[$i,$j].sum {
           when Order::More { $i += 1 }
           when Order::Less { $j -= 1 }
           when Order::Same { return $i, $j }
       }
   }
   return;

}

say two_sum ( 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 ), 21; say two_sum ( 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 ), 25;</lang>

Output:
(1 3)
Nil

Functional

The two versions differ only in how one 'reads' the notional flow of processing: left-to-right versus right-to-left. Both return all pairs that sum to the target value, not just the first (e.g. for input of 0 2 10 11 19 90 would get indices 1/4 and 2/3). <lang perl6>sub two-sum-lr (@a, $sum) {

 # (((^@a X ^@a) Z=> (@a X+ @a)).grep($sum == *.value)>>.keys.map:{ .split(' ').sort.join(' ')}).unique
   (
    (
     (^@a X ^@a) Z=> (@a X+ @a)
    ).grep($sum == *.value)>>.keys
    .map:{ .split(' ').sort.join(' ')}
   ).unique

}

sub two-sum-rl (@a, $sum) {

 # unique map {.split(' ').sort.join(' ')}, keys %(grep {.value == $sum}, ((^@a X ^@a) Z=> (@a X+ @a)))
   unique
   map {.split(' ').sort.join(' ')},
   keys %(
    grep {.value == $sum}, (
     (^@a X ^@a) Z=> (@a X+ @a)
    )
   )

}

my @a = <0 2 11 19 90>; for 21, 25 {

   say two-sum-rl(@a, $_);
   say two-sum-lr(@a, $_);

}</lang>

Output:
(1 3)
(1 3)
()
()

REXX

version 1

<lang rexx>/* REXX */ list='-5 26 0 2 11 19 90' Do i=0 By 1 Until list=

 Parse Var list a.i list
 End

n=i x=21 z=0 do i=0 To n

 Do j=i+1 To n
   s=a.i+a.j
   If s=x Then Do
     z=z+1
     Say '['i','j']' a.i a.j s
     End
   End
 End

If z=0 Then

 Say '[] - no items found'

Else

 Say z 'solutions found'</lang>
Output:
[0,1] -5 26 21
[3,5] 2 19 21
2 solutions found

version 2

All solutions are listed (if any),   along with a count of the number of solutions.

Also, it's mentioned that the indices are zero─based,   and formatted solutions are shown.

The list of numbers can be in any format,   not just integers.   Also, they need not be unique.

The list of integers   needn't   be sorted.

A   numeric digits 500   statement was added just in case some humongous numbers were entered.

No verification was performed to ensure that all items in the list were numeric.

A little extra code was added to have the output columns aligned. <lang rexx>/*REXX program finds two numbers in a list of numbers that sum to a particular target.*/ numeric digits 500 /*be able to handle some larger numbers*/ parse arg targ list /*obtain optional arguments from the CL*/ if targ= | targ="," then targ= 21 /*Not specified? Then use the defaults*/ if list= | list="," then list= 0 2 11 19 90 /* " " " " " " */ say 'the list: ' list /*echo the list to the terminal*/ say 'the target sum: ' targ /* " " target sum " " " */ w= 0; sol= 0 /*width; # of solutions found (so far)*/

     do #=0  for words(list); _=word(list, #+1) /*examine the list, construct an array.*/
     @.#= _;            w= max(w, length(_) )   /*assign a number to an indexed array. */
     end  /*#*/                                 /*W:  the maximum width of any number. */

L= length(#) /*L: " " " " " index. */ @solution= 'a solution: zero─based indices ' /*a SAY literal for space conservation.*/ say /* [↓] look for sum of 2 numbers=target*/

     do    a=0    for #                         /*scan up to the last number in array. */
        do b=a+1  to  #-1;  if @.a + @.b\=targ  then iterate   /*Sum not correct? Skip.*/
        sol= sol + 1                            /*bump count of the number of solutions*/
        say @solution       center( "["right(a, L)','       right(b, L)"]",     L+L+5) ,
            right(@.a, w*4)     " + "       right(@.b, w)       ' = '           targ
        end   /*b*/                             /*show the 2 indices and the summation.*/
     end      /*a*/

say if sol==0 then sol= 'None' /*prettify the number of solutions if 0*/ say 'number of solutions found: ' sol /*stick a fork in it, we're all done. */</lang>

output   when using the default inputs:
the list:        0 2 11 19 90
the target sum:  21

a solution:  zero─based indices    [1, 3]         2  +  19  =  21

number of solutions found:  1
output   when using the input of:     21     -78 -5 1 0 -1 -4 11 14 23.5 5 +3 2. 18 -2.50 +2 16 19 018 23 24 25 26 199 2 3 17 +18 19 03 3 .18e2
the list:        -78 -5 1 0 -1 -4 11 14 23.5 5 +3 2. 18 -2.50 +2 16 19 018 23 24 25 26 199 2 3 17 +18 19 03 3 .18e2
the target sum:  21

a solution:  zero─based indices    [ 1, 21]                    -5  +     26  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [ 5, 20]                    -4  +     25  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [ 8, 13]                  23.5  +  -2.50  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [ 9, 15]                     5  +     16  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [10, 12]                    +3  +     18  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [10, 17]                    +3  +    018  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [10, 26]                    +3  +    +18  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [10, 30]                    +3  +  .18e2  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [11, 16]                    2.  +     19  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [11, 27]                    2.  +     19  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [12, 24]                    18  +      3  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [12, 28]                    18  +     03  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [12, 29]                    18  +      3  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [14, 16]                    +2  +     19  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [14, 27]                    +2  +     19  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [16, 23]                    19  +      2  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [17, 24]                   018  +      3  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [17, 28]                   018  +     03  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [17, 29]                   018  +      3  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [23, 27]                     2  +     19  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [24, 26]                     3  +    +18  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [24, 30]                     3  +  .18e2  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [26, 28]                   +18  +     03  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [26, 29]                   +18  +      3  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [28, 30]                    03  +  .18e2  =  21
a solution:  zero─based indices    [29, 30]                     3  +  .18e2  =  21

number of solutions found:  26

Ring

<lang ring>

  1. Project : Two Sum

numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] sum = 21

see "order list: " for n=1 to len(numbers)

   see " " + numbers[n] 

next see " (using a zero index.)" + nl for n=1 to len(numbers)

   for m=n to len(numbers)
       if numbers[n] + numbers[m] = sum
          see "target sum:  " + sum + nl
          see "a solution: ["
          see  "" + (n-1) + " " + (m-1) + "]" + nl
       ok
   next

next </lang> Output:

order list:  0 2 11 19 90 (using a zero index.)
target sum:  21
a solution: [1 3]

Ruby

<lang ruby>def two_sum(numbers, sum)

 numbers.each_with_index do |x,i|
   if j = numbers.index(sum - x) then return [i,j] end
 end
 []

end

numbers = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] p two_sum(numbers, 21) p two_sum(numbers, 25)</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[]

When the size of the Array is bigger, the following is more suitable. <lang ruby>def two_sum(numbers, sum)

 numbers.each_with_index do |x,i|
   key = sum - x
   if j = numbers.bsearch_index{|y| key<=>y}
     return [i,j]
   end
 end
 []

end</lang>

Rust

<lang Rust>use std::cmp::Ordering; use std::ops::Add;

fn two_sum<T>(arr: &[T], sum: T) -> Option<(usize, usize)> where

   T: Add<Output = T> + Ord + Copy,

{

   if arr.len() == 0 {
       return None;
   }
   let mut i = 0;
   let mut j = arr.len() - 1;
   while i < j {
       match (arr[i] + arr[j]).cmp(&sum) {
           Ordering::Equal => return Some((i, j)),
           Ordering::Less => i += 1,
           Ordering::Greater => j -= 1,
       }
   }
   None

}

fn main() {

   let arr = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90];
   let sum = 21;
   println!("{:?}", two_sum(&arr, sum));

}</lang>

Output:
Some((1, 3))

Scala

<lang Scala>import java.util

object TwoSum extends App {

 val (sum, arr)= (21, Array(0, 2, 11, 19, 90))
 println(util.Arrays.toString(twoSum(arr, sum)))
 private def twoSum(a: Array[Int], target: Long): Array[Int] = {
   var (i, j) = (0, a.length - 1)
   while (i < j) {
     val sum = a(i) + a(j)
     if (sum == target) return Array[Int](i, j)
     if (sum < target) i += 1 else j -= 1
   }
   null
 }

}</lang>

Output:

See it running in your browser by ScalaFiddle (JavaScript, non JVM) or by Scastie (JVM).

Sidef

Translation of: Raku

<lang ruby>func two_sum(numbers, sum) {

   var (i, j) = (0, numbers.end)
   while (i < j) {
       given (sum <=> numbers[i]+numbers[j]) {
           when (-1) { --j }
           when (+1) { ++i }
           default { return [i, j] }
       }
   }
   return []

}

say two_sum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 21) say two_sum([0, 2, 11, 19, 90], 25)</lang>

Output:
[1, 3]
[]

Stata

Notice that array indexes start at 1 in Stata. <lang stata>function find(a, x) { i = 1 j = length(a) while (i<j) { s = a[i]+a[j] if (s<x) i++ else if (s>x) j-- else return((i,j)) } }

find((0,2,11,19,90),21)

      1   2
   +---------+
 1 |  2   4  |
   +---------+</lang>

Vala

<lang Vala>void main() {

 int arr[] = { 0, 2, 11, 19, 90 }, sum = 21, i, j, check = 0;
 
 for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { 
   for ( j = i+1; j < 5; j++) { 
     if (arr[i] + arr[j] == sum) { 
       print("[%d,%d]",i,j); 
       check = 1;
       break; 
     }
   }
 }
 if (check == 0) 
   print("[]");

}</lang>

Output:
[1,3]

VBA

<lang vb>Option Explicit Function two_sum(a As Variant, t As Integer) As Variant

   Dim i, j As Integer
   i = 0
   j = UBound(a)
   Do While (i < j)
       If (a(i) + a(j) = t) Then
           two_sum = Array(i, j)
           Exit Function
       ElseIf (a(i) + a(j) < t) Then i = i + 1
       ElseIf (a(i) + a(j) > t) Then j = j - 1
       End If
   Loop
   two_sum = Array()

End Function Sub prnt(a As Variant)

   If UBound(a) = 1 Then
       Selection.TypeText Text:="(" & a(0) & ", " & a(1) & ")" & vbCrLf
   Else
       Selection.TypeText Text:="()" & vbCrLf
   End If

End Sub Sub main()

   Call prnt(two_sum(Array(0, 2, 11, 19, 90), 21))
   Call prnt(two_sum(Array(-8, -2, 0, 1, 5, 8, 11), 3))
   Call prnt(two_sum(Array(-3, -2, 0, 1, 5, 8, 11), 17))
   Call prnt(two_sum(Array(-8, -2, -1, 1, 5, 9, 11), 0))

End Sub</lang>

Output:
(1, 3)
(0, 6)
()
(2, 3)

Visual Basic .NET

Translation of: C#

<lang vbnet>Module Module1

   Function TwoSum(numbers As Integer(), sum As Integer) As Integer()
       Dim map As New Dictionary(Of Integer, Integer)
       For index = 1 To numbers.Length
           Dim i = index - 1
           ' see if the complement is stored
           Dim key = sum - numbers(i)
           If map.ContainsKey(key) Then
               Return {map(key), i}
           End If
           map.Add(numbers(i), i)
       Next
       Return Nothing
   End Function
   Sub Main()
       Dim arr = {0, 2, 1, 19, 90}
       Const sum = 21
       Dim ts = TwoSum(arr, sum)
       Console.WriteLine(If(IsNothing(ts), "no result", $"{ts(0)}, {ts(1)}"))
   End Sub

End Module</lang>

Output:
1, 3

X86 Assembly

Translation of: Python
Works with: nasm

<lang asm> section .data

   outputArr dd 0,0,0
   inputArr dd 5,0,2,11,19,90
   

section .text global _main _main:

   mov ebp, esp
   mov eax, 21 ;num we search for
   push inputArr
   call func
   add esp, 4
   ret

func:

   mov esi, [ebp - 4];get arr address from stack
   add esi, 4 ;esi now points to the first element instead of the length
   mov edx, 0 ;i
   mov ecx, [esi - 4] ;j
   dec ecx ;counting starts from 0
   looping:
       cmp edx, ecx ;while i < j
       jge return        
       mov ebx, [esi + edx * 4]
       add ebx, [esi + ecx * 4] ;inputArr[i] + inputArr[j]
       cmp ebx, eax ;inputArr[i] + inputArr[j] (==|<|else) eax 
       je end ;==
       jl i ;<
       dec ecx ;else j--
       jmp looping
   i:
       inc edx ;i++
       jmp looping
   end:
       mov eax, 2 ;if we find a combination our array has a length of 2
       mov [outputArr], eax ;length is in the first 4 byte cell
       mov [outputArr + 4], edx ;i
       mov [outputArr + 8], ecx ;j
   return:
   mov eax, outputArr ;address of outputArr is returned in eax
   ret

</lang>

Wren

<lang ecmascript>var twosum = Fn.new { |a, n|

   var c = a.count
   if (c < 2) return []
   for (i in 0...c-1) {
       for (j in i+1...c) {
           var s = a[i] + a[j] 
           if (s == n) return [i, j]
           if (s > n) break
       }
   }
   return []

}

var a = [0, 2, 11, 19, 90] System.print("Numbers: %(a)\n") for (n in [21, 25, 90]) {

   var pair = twosum.call(a, n)
   if (pair.count == 2) {
       System.print("Indices: %(pair) sum to %(n) (%(a[pair[0]]) + %(a[pair[1]]) = %(n))")
   } else {
       System.print("No pairs of the above numbers sum to %(n).")
   }
   System.print()

}</lang>

Output:
Numbers: [0, 2, 11, 19, 90]

Indices: [1, 3] sum to 21 (2 + 19 = 21)

No pairs of the above numbers sum to 25.

Indices: [0, 4] sum to 90 (0 + 90 = 90)

zkl

The sorted O(n) no external storage solution: <lang zkl>fcn twoSum(sum,ns){

  i,j:=0,ns.len()-1;
  while(i<j){
     if((s:=ns[i] + ns[j]) == sum) return(i,j);
     else if(s<sum) i+=1;
     else if(s>sum) j-=1;
  }

}</lang> <lang zkl>twoSum2(21,T(0,2,11,19,90)).println(); twoSum2(25,T(0,2,11,19,90)).println();</lang>

Output:
L(1,3)
False

The unsorted O(n!) all solutions solution: <lang zkl>fcn twoSum2(sum,ns){

  Utils.Helpers.combosKW(2,ns).filter('wrap([(a,b)]){ a+b==sum })  // lazy combos
  .apply('wrap([(a,b)]){ return(ns.index(a),ns.index(b)) })

}</lang> <lang zkl>twoSum2(21,T(0,2,11,19,90,21)).println(); twoSum2(25,T(0,2,11,19,90,21)).println();</lang>

Output:
L(L(0,5),L(1,3))
L()