Talk:State name puzzle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(answer to harmonizing question) |
(ββThe rules of harmonising: equivalence.) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Off the top because Wisconsin was one of the original states. Or put another way ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') -> ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') - the new pair doesn't count as "two other U.S. States" --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
: Off the top because Wisconsin was one of the original states. Or put another way ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') -> ('Wisconsin', 'New Kory') - the new pair doesn't count as "two other U.S. States" --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
Hi Dgamey, I paired Wisconsin with: |
|||
'Kory New' |
|||
'New Kory' |
|||
'New York' |
|||
'Wen Kory' |
|||
and 'York New' |
|||
As they don't seem to be duplicates of each other. If the harmonisation where to equate states of two or more words if the individual words are the same, then I could then see that 'New York' is equivalent to 'York New', and 'Kory New' === 'New Kory', but I am not sure of this from the task definition. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |