Talk:Sorting algorithms/Gnome sort: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(C problem? The second j := j + 1 seems to be missing?) |
(it works, but maybe not gnome sort then...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== C problem? == |
== C problem? == |
||
The second <code>j := j + 1</code> from the example seems to be missing? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 17:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
The second <code>j := j + 1</code> from the example seems to be missing? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 17:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
: The code works for sure (I've used it in LZW... anyway I've written also a test code and did some testing and it seems to work...); I can't remember, maybe I've "reinterpreted" it or optimized it... I will study if it is still Gnome, or if I've changed it so that it can be called Gnome sort no more. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:28, 27 April 2009
C problem?
The second j := j + 1 from the example seems to be missing? --Paddy3118 17:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- The code works for sure (I've used it in LZW... anyway I've written also a test code and did some testing and it seems to work...); I can't remember, maybe I've "reinterpreted" it or optimized it... I will study if it is still Gnome, or if I've changed it so that it can be called Gnome sort no more. --ShinTakezou 18:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)