Talk:Loops/Infinite

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 13:42, 6 February 2010 by rosettacode>UnderBot (moved Talk:Loop/Infinite to Talk:Loops/Infinite)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Why was the UnixPipes entry

yes SPAM

removed? (I think sequences are a way to generate loops in pipes, just as recursion is used to simulate loops in functional languages like haskell). So a loop of printing it 5 times would be

yes SPAM | head -n 5

(see for loop too) Rahul 12:16, 11 April 2008 (MDT)



The code for many programming language is not a complete program. Why is this?

--79.77.166.164 20:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)