Talk:Loops/Infinite: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (moved Talk:Loop/Infinite to Talk:Loops/Infinite) |
||
(No difference)
| |||
Latest revision as of 13:42, 6 February 2010
Why was the UnixPipes entry
yes SPAM
removed? (I think sequences are a way to generate loops in pipes, just as recursion is used to simulate loops in functional languages like haskell). So a loop of printing it 5 times would be
yes SPAM | head -n 5
(see for loop too) Rahul 12:16, 11 April 2008 (MDT)
The code for many programming language is not a complete program. Why is this?
--79.77.166.164 20:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)