Talk:Linear congruential generator: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→On the task: Seed to succeed?) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: The task with built-in RNGs doesn't necessarily map. There's no guarantee that the built-in RNG is a linear congruential generator; that's just the most common implementation option. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
: The task with built-in RNGs doesn't necessarily map. There's no guarantee that the built-in RNG is a linear congruential generator; that's just the most common implementation option. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 15:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:: Still there is no task see "insert task here". It's basically encyclopedic. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 02:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC) |
:: Still there is no task see "insert task here". It's basically encyclopedic. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 02:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
==On the task== |
|||
I kinda remember something about not all seeds being good? a seed of zero for example? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:07, 7 July 2011
OK, What's the task
Not to be impatient but so far this is a nice explanation of LCRNG's but there is no task.
There are other tasks with LCRNGs like Random_number_generator_(included) which pertains to what is built in.
What do we need to do to solve this task? --Dgamey 01:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- The task with built-in RNGs doesn't necessarily map. There's no guarantee that the built-in RNG is a linear congruential generator; that's just the most common implementation option. –Donal Fellows 15:42, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Still there is no task see "insert task here". It's basically encyclopedic. --Dgamey 02:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
On the task
I kinda remember something about not all seeds being good? a seed of zero for example? --Paddy3118 05:07, 7 July 2011 (UTC)