Talk:Integer sequence

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 01:35, 17 February 2011 by MikeMol (talk | contribs) (→‎Criteria for non-draft?: Added some detail.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Criteria for non-draft?

What are the criteria for this being a non-draft task? My usual rule-of-thumbs are all satisfied (multiple correct implementations by multiple people, so it appears to be entirely understandable and practical). –Donal Fellows 00:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I've been satisfied with it for a while, just waiting for people to bring up any issues they had. Converted to non-draft. --Michael Mol 01:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
I just added a recommendation for showing both native and arbitrarily-large numbers where appropriate, and soliciting discussion of the state of such in the language. --Michael Mol 01:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)