Talk:Generator/Exponential: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Name change request: Any more reasons?) |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::::: Perhaps "sequential generator"? But, yes, "generator" does have [http://www.sz-wholesale.com/uploadFiles/LPG-B%20Generator_802.jpg other meanings] --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
::::: Perhaps "sequential generator"? But, yes, "generator" does have [http://www.sz-wholesale.com/uploadFiles/LPG-B%20Generator_802.jpg other meanings] --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::: Yeah that sounds good, apart from the generator is this task is exponential, but I do like the sound of that for a sequential output version (such as the type used for generating ticket numbers or invoice numbers), if such a task was written. We could probably go with "Exponential generator", or "Sequence Generator/Exponential". --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 20:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Ok, tooting my own horn here a bit, but I put together a nice little Python module for [https://code.google.com/p/dastoobnet/source/browse/multi_m1/filterstack.py using stacked generators] as a filter chain. The docs might be illuminating in this discussion. [http://codepad.org/S7lYcnpO Here's its demo output], on Codepad.--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
:::: Ok, tooting my own horn here a bit, but I put together a nice little Python module for [https://code.google.com/p/dastoobnet/source/browse/multi_m1/filterstack.py using stacked generators] as a filter chain. The docs might be illuminating in this discussion. [http://codepad.org/S7lYcnpO Here's its demo output], on Codepad.--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC) |
||