Talk:Forward difference: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== J: verb vs adverb == |
== J: verb vs adverb == |
||
With regard to the replacement of ((}. - }:) ^:) by (2&(-/\)): |
With regard to the replacement of '''<tt>((}. - }:) ^:)</tt>''' by '''<tt>(2&(-/\))</tt>''': |
||
I agree that a solution in the form of a verb is somewhat better than a solution that is an adverb, although the benefits strike me as subtle and minor. |
I agree that a solution in the form of a verb is somewhat better than a solution that is an adverb, although the benefits strike me as subtle and minor. |
||
I think the original solution is worth retaining as an example because of its form. It is not only a different algorithm, it is another strong example of how tacit form allows one to "code the concept." These two solutions complement one another, so both should be included. |
I think the original solution is worth retaining as an example because of its form. It is not only a different algorithm, it is another strong example of how tacit form allows one to "code the concept." These two solutions complement one another, so both should be included. |