Talk:Fivenum: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* There are several conventions for boxplot statistics. Not all statistical programs draw boxplots like R. |
* There are several conventions for boxplot statistics. Not all statistical programs draw boxplots like R. |
||
* Also, 5 numbers are obviously not enough to reproduce a boxplot, as outliers are usually drawn as well. This is not a problem if we admit we don't need the outliers. |
* Also, 5 numbers are obviously not enough to reproduce a boxplot, as outliers are usually drawn as well. This is not a problem if we admit we don't need the outliers. |
||
All in all, the task seems to be "rewrite R's fivenum in your language". It certainly can be a task, but it's rather short-sighted: there are other languages beyond R, out there. |
|||
[[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 20:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC) |
[[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 20:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:55, 25 February 2018
The task needs clarification
- What the task is actually asking for is the 5 numbers used to draw a boxplot. This has nothing to do with "big data", or with producing a "smaller array". Requiring that the five numbers yield the same boxplot if they are treated as data is pretty useless: the task emphasizes space reduction, but it will not save space.
- There are several conventions for boxplot statistics. Not all statistical programs draw boxplots like R.
- Also, 5 numbers are obviously not enough to reproduce a boxplot, as outliers are usually drawn as well. This is not a problem if we admit we don't need the outliers.
All in all, the task seems to be "rewrite R's fivenum in your language". It certainly can be a task, but it's rather short-sighted: there are other languages beyond R, out there.