Talk:Fivenum: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(answered eoraptor's criticism) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== License == |
== License == |
||
The R function is part of the R source, hence has GPL license. Any translation of this is a derivative work. On such a simple function, I doubt it would be a problem, but please be careful next time: copy-pasting is '''not''' fine. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 23:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC) |
The R function is part of the R source, hence has GPL license. Any translation of this is a derivative work. On such a simple function, I doubt it would be a problem, but please be careful next time: copy-pasting is '''not''' fine. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 23:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC) |
||
"This has nothing to do with "big data", or with producing a "smaller array". Requiring that the five numbers yield the same boxplot if they are treated as data is pretty useless: the task emphasizes space reduction, but it will not save space." |
|||
Everything in this quote is objectively false. I had a task in my job to make boxplots with huge datasets (> 120 GB of data) but all I needed were these five data points. It made no sense whatsoever to save every data point. I was doing this in Perl, since I don't like using R unless I have to. That was the purpose of the page. On the contrary, this task was very useful for me, but maybe not for you. I wouldn't have been able to make these plots without this task, specifically the Perl translation. "pretty useless"? on the contrary, this was essential, and I couldn't have performed the task without it. In the spirit of generosity, I decided to make my work in translating R's fivenum function available to others in case they had the same problem I did. |
|||