Talk:Call a function: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
Line 20: Line 20:
My “Huh?” about this task is that it asks for all sorts of things rather than being something more focussed, making it awkward to properly deal with from the perspective of someone trying to an implementation ''or'' from someone looking things up. Would it be better done as multiple sub-tasks? (How many of those sub-tasks actually exist already?) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 14:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
My “Huh?” about this task is that it asks for all sorts of things rather than being something more focussed, making it awkward to properly deal with from the perspective of someone trying to an implementation ''or'' from someone looking things up. Would it be better done as multiple sub-tasks? (How many of those sub-tasks actually exist already?) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 14:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)


:I don't think that we should split the task. However, we could cross reference to another task where an appropriate explanation is given. For example, if a language supports named parameters, we could say: "This language supports calling a function using [[Named parameters|named parameters]]", with a link to the appropriate explanation. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 16:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
:I don't think that we should split the task. However, we could cross reference to another task where an appropriate explanation is given. For example, if a language supports named parameters, we could say: "This language supports [[Named parameters|calling a function using named parameters]]", with a link to the appropriate explanation. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 16:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)