Talk:Attractive numbers: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== optional requirements? == What about some ''optional'' requirements, such as: ::*   showing the   ''number''   (count)   of attractive numbers up to an...")
 
(→‎optional requirements?: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt)
Line 9: Line 9:


The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

:: I would suggest 10^5 but not 10^6, which would heat a lot of cores, reduce the number of participating languages, and perhaps yield rather limited additional insight or opportunities for learning ?

:: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)