Talk:Attractive numbers

From Rosetta Code

optional requirements?[edit]

What about some optional requirements, such as:

  •   showing the   number   (count)   of attractive numbers up to and including:
  •   10,000
  •   100,000
  •   1,000,000

The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

I would suggest 10^5 but not 10^6, which would heat a lot of cores, reduce the number of participating languages, and perhaps yield rather limited additional insight or opportunities for learning ?
A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt :-) Hout (talk) 10:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
--Paddy3118 (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)