Talk:24 game/Solve: Revision history

1 January 2019

• curprev 09:2309:23, 1 January 2019‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 7,381 bytes +491‎ →‎Use 3 3 8 8 in example runs?: added some comments.

27 January 2011

• curprev 21:2321:23, 27 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,890 bytes +293‎ →‎Negating the first number?: You may have other operations, ... but not in this version.
• curprev 16:4916:49, 27 January 2011‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 6,597 bytes +165‎ →‎Negating the first number?

26 January 2011

• curprev 06:0406:04, 26 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,432 bytes +243‎ →‎Negating the first number?: Why not.
• curprev 06:0006:00, 26 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,189 bytes +400‎ →‎Use 3 3 8 8 in example runs?

6 January 2011

• curprev 00:2800:28, 6 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Rjf89‎ 5,789 bytes +51‎ →‎Negating the first number?
• curprev 00:2800:28, 6 January 2011‎ rosettacode>Rjf89‎ 5,738 bytes +259‎ No edit summary

27 July 2010

• curprev 05:3205:32, 27 July 2010‎ rosettacode>Andrew Gacek‎ m 5,479 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 05:3205:32, 27 July 2010‎ rosettacode>Andrew Gacek‎ 5,477 bytes +125‎ No edit summary

6 February 2010

• curprev 12:2212:22, 6 February 2010‎ rosettacode>UnderBot‎ m 5,352 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:24 game Player to Talk:24 game/Solve

6 January 2010

• curprev 06:2206:22, 6 January 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 5,352 bytes +289‎ →‎Use 1 1 2 7 in example runs?

5 December 2009

• curprev 10:1810:18, 5 December 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 5,063 bytes +328‎ →‎Clojure, generality, and new to Wiki: Looks good to me.
• curprev 07:5907:59, 5 December 2009‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 4,735 bytes +179‎ →‎Clojure, generality, and new to Wiki: Template:In progress?
• curprev 04:0404:04, 5 December 2009‎ rosettacode>Geva‎ 4,556 bytes +651‎ No edit summary

26 November 2009

• curprev 14:2014:20, 26 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Glennj‎ m 3,905 bytes +104‎ →‎Ruby and checking for 0?

25 November 2009

• curprev 04:3604:36, 25 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,801 bytes +161‎ →‎Ruby and checking for 0?: Will the Ruby code allow zero as a digit in its checking routine?

4 November 2009

• curprev 05:2505:25, 4 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,640 bytes +372‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?: Not now!

3 November 2009

• curprev 01:3101:31, 3 November 2009‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 3,268 bytes +209‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?: No worries

2 November 2009

• curprev 22:5222:52, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,059 bytes +203‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?
• curprev 16:2916:29, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ m 2,856 bytes +1‎ →‎Should we enumerate all solutions?
• curprev 16:2916:29, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 2,855 bytes +74‎ →‎Should we enumerate all solutions?
• curprev 16:0216:02, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 2,781 bytes +265‎ →‎Should we enumerate all solutions?
• curprev 13:5313:53, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 2,516 bytes +408‎ →‎Should we enumerate all solutions?: new section
• curprev 11:3511:35, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 2,108 bytes +457‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?: Declare 'em and everything's sweet
• curprev 11:1611:16, 2 November 2009‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 1,651 bytes +202‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?: external libraries
• curprev 06:4206:42, 2 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 1,449 bytes +148‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?
• curprev 00:2300:23, 2 November 2009‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 1,301 bytes +232‎ Declarative logic

1 November 2009

• curprev 21:4021:40, 1 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 1,069 bytes +309‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?
• curprev 18:5718:57, 1 November 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 760 bytes +542‎ →‎Python Solution incomplete?
• curprev 17:1917:19, 1 November 2009‎ 164.67.235.128 talk‎ 218 bytes +218‎ Created page with 'One problem with this solution is that it can only attempt one set of brackets. What if more than one set of brackets is necessary? --~~~~'