Category talk:6502 Assembly: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(merged) |
(→Language vs virtual machine: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: [[User:UnderBot|UnderBot]] has the ability to do this, but the examples will need to have their usage of [[Template:header]] manually adjusted to use the correct language naming. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC) |
: [[User:UnderBot|UnderBot]] has the ability to do this, but the examples will need to have their usage of [[Template:header]] manually adjusted to use the correct language naming. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
: Done. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
: Done. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 15:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Language vs virtual machine == |
|||
This language, along with some like x86 assembly, are particular to a virtual machine as defined by a processor spec. I'm thinking they should be considered as such, and different assemblers take the role of 'language' as RC normally thinks of it. Does that make sense to anyone else? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:19, 9 September 2010
This page and 6502 Assembler should be merged. -- 09:00, 20 May 2010 EdK
- UnderBot has the ability to do this, but the examples will need to have their usage of Template:header manually adjusted to use the correct language naming. --Michael Mol 13:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Done. --IanOsgood 15:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Language vs virtual machine
This language, along with some like x86 assembly, are particular to a virtual machine as defined by a processor spec. I'm thinking they should be considered as such, and different assemblers take the role of 'language' as RC normally thinks of it. Does that make sense to anyone else? --Michael Mol 13:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)