Talk:Y combinator: Revision history

15 October 2018

• curprev 06:1706:17, 15 October 2018‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ m 26,862 bytes +5‎ →‎Problem with the first non function recursive Haskell version of Y-combinator

13 October 2018

• curprev 01:4801:48, 13 October 2018‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ 26,857 bytes +2,356‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit: report removing non-Y-combinator and a problem with a Haskell Applicative version...

11 October 2018

• curprev 12:0712:07, 11 October 2018‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ 24,501 bytes +1,051‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit: response after reversion...
• curprev 11:5311:53, 11 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 23,450 bytes +120‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit

10 October 2018

• curprev 22:3122:31, 10 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 23,330 bytes +216‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
• curprev 22:1622:16, 10 October 2018‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ 23,114 bytes +2,741‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit: response...
• curprev 13:1613:16, 10 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 20,373 bytes +1‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit
• curprev 13:1513:15, 10 October 2018‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 20,372 bytes +559‎ →‎Temporary reversion of a recent Haskell edit

11 July 2016

• curprev 03:3703:37, 11 July 2016‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ m 19,813 bytes +91‎ →‎Comment on the overall task: minor correction
• curprev 03:3203:32, 11 July 2016‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ 19,722 bytes +1,207‎ →‎Comment on the overall task: edited, responded...

10 July 2016

• curprev 16:0716:07, 10 July 2016‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 18,515 bytes +230‎ →‎Comment on the overall task
• curprev 16:0316:03, 10 July 2016‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ m 18,285 bytes +13‎ →‎Comment on the overall task
• curprev 16:0316:03, 10 July 2016‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 18,272 bytes +430‎ →‎Comment on the overall task
• curprev 15:5315:53, 10 July 2016‎ GordonBGood talk contribs‎ 17,842 bytes +6,198‎ Added comment on the Task...

26 May 2015

• curprev 03:1903:19, 26 May 2015‎ rosettacode>Thepigdog‎ 11,644 bytes −22‎ →‎Wolfram example
• curprev 03:1803:18, 26 May 2015‎ rosettacode>Thepigdog‎ 11,666 bytes +466‎ →‎PicoLisp not incorrect

30 May 2011

• curprev 14:0014:00, 30 May 2011‎ 61.95.189.226 talk‎ 11,200 bytes +133‎ →‎Is the C++ a combinator or just recursion "macro"?

11 April 2011

• curprev 19:5719:57, 11 April 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 11,067 bytes +105‎ →‎PicoLisp not incorrect: Sorry.
• curprev 18:5918:59, 11 April 2011‎ rosettacode>Kernigh‎ m 10,962 bytes −24‎ →‎PicoLisp not incorrect: Someone else removed it from the E example.
• curprev 18:5718:57, 11 April 2011‎ rosettacode>Kernigh‎ 10,986 bytes +562‎ →‎PicoLisp not incorrect: new section
• curprev 03:3403:34, 11 April 2011‎ rosettacode>Kernigh‎ 10,424 bytes +2,518‎ →‎Is this really the "Y" combinator?: Ruby has not the Y combinator.

10 April 2011

• curprev 06:4806:48, 10 April 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 7,906 bytes +382‎ →‎Is the C++ a combinator or just recursion "macro"?

21 November 2010

• curprev 20:0720:07, 21 November 2010‎ 93.144.202.116 talk‎ 7,524 bytes +235‎ →‎"Y" combinator in Scheme
• curprev 20:0420:04, 21 November 2010‎ 93.144.202.116 talk‎ 7,289 bytes +159‎ →‎"Y" combinator in Scheme
• curprev 14:2214:22, 21 November 2010‎ 93.144.202.116 talk‎ 7,130 bytes +425‎ No edit summary

12 September 2010

• curprev 04:3104:31, 12 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,705 bytes +70‎ →‎Perl 6 comment on the need for Y?: Ta!
• curprev 04:0504:05, 12 September 2010‎ rosettacode>TimToady‎ 6,635 bytes +398‎ →‎Perl 6 comment on the need for Y?

11 September 2010

• curprev 09:5109:51, 11 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 6,237 bytes +500‎ →‎Perl 6 comment on the need for Y?

30 November 2009

• curprev 17:2817:28, 30 November 2009‎ 131.155.116.18 talk‎ 5,737 bytes +467‎ →‎Is this really the "Y" combinator?

5 June 2009

• curprev 05:5405:54, 5 June 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 5,270 bytes +413‎ Slate entry incomplete?

20 May 2009

• curprev 20:1920:19, 20 May 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 4,857 bytes +446‎ →‎Could We remove the recursive examples!
• curprev 09:3409:34, 20 May 2009‎ rosettacode>ShinTakezou‎ 4,411 bytes +231‎ →‎Could We remove the recursive examples!
• curprev 05:5205:52, 20 May 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 4,180 bytes +273‎ →‎Could We remove the recursive examples!

28 March 2009

• curprev 00:2100:21, 28 March 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ m 3,907 bytes +17‎ →‎Could We remove the recursive examples!
• curprev 00:1900:19, 28 March 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,890 bytes +147‎ Could We remove the recursive examples

2 March 2009

• curprev 05:4805:48, 2 March 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 3,743 bytes +275‎ →‎Is this really the "Y" combinator?: Some texts make the distinction.

1 March 2009

• curprev 20:4920:49, 1 March 2009‎ 71.106.173.110 talk‎ 3,468 bytes +835‎ →‎Is this really the "Y" combinator?: new section

28 February 2009

• curprev 18:4418:44, 28 February 2009‎ 140.180.177.122 talk‎ 2,633 bytes +1,686‎ →‎Haskell stateless?
• curprev 11:0511:05, 28 February 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 947 bytes +197‎ →‎Haskell stateless?: Recursive types?
• curprev 10:4210:42, 28 February 2009‎ rosettacode>Spoon!‎ 750 bytes +246‎ No edit summary
• curprev 09:2209:22, 28 February 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 504 bytes +159‎ →‎Haskell stateless?
• curprev 09:1809:18, 28 February 2009‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 345 bytes +345‎ New page: ==Haskell stateless?== I don't know Haskell, but isn't the definition: y f = f (y f) '''not''' stateless as it seems to be defining y by referring to y. Haskell, no doubt has lazy evalua...