Talk:Roman numerals/Encode: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Fixed negative numbers condition in Java) |
(New section: Spec?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I'm pretty sure CD is 400. If you look at [[wp:Roman_numerals#Modern_Roman_numerals]] it shows it. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:20, 31 March 2008 (MDT) |
I'm pretty sure CD is 400. If you look at [[wp:Roman_numerals#Modern_Roman_numerals]] it shows it. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:20, 31 March 2008 (MDT) |
||
== Spec? == |
|||
Roman numerals are by no means standardized. You should reference the particular brand of encoding you wish to support. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 08:53, 1 April 2008 (MDT) |
|||
Revision as of 14:53, 1 April 2008
The Java example does not enforce the requirement that the parameter for the conversion function must be a positive integer. Enforcement of such a requirement should result in an error condition, such as an exception, rather than simply no output when a value less than 1 is passed to the function.--Waldorf 21:14, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
- Fixed. --Mwn3d 21:22, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
400
I'm pretty sure CD is 400. If you look at wp:Roman_numerals#Modern_Roman_numerals it shows it. --Mwn3d 21:20, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
Spec?
Roman numerals are by no means standardized. You should reference the particular brand of encoding you wish to support. --IanOsgood 08:53, 1 April 2008 (MDT)