Talk:Roman numerals/Encode: Revision history

29 November 2019

• curprev 13:1713:17, 29 November 2019‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 6,279 bytes +186‎ added a new talk section.

20 July 2016

• curprev 18:4118:41, 20 July 2016‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 6,093 bytes +30‎ added a talk section header so that the TOC (table of contents) appears at the correct location.
• curprev 10:3010:30, 20 July 2016‎ rosettacode>Guardons‎ 6,063 bytes +488‎ No edit summary

20 April 2013

• curprev 20:2720:27, 20 April 2013‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 5,575 bytes +167‎ →‎Spec?: clarified the use of lowecase j instead of i. -- ~~~~

14 July 2012

• curprev 08:0808:08, 14 July 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 5,408 bytes +277‎ →‎Spec?: added ''style'' to ''Attic'' and explained (somewhat) the Attic style.
• curprev 07:4707:47, 14 July 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ 5,131 bytes +371‎ →‎Spec?: expanded comments on various Roman numeral options. -- ~~~~

26 April 2012

• curprev 21:0121:01, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ m 4,760 bytes 0‎ →‎Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: correct my own typo
• curprev 10:4610:46, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 4,760 bytes +326‎ →‎Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: Font dependent
• curprev 02:5702:57, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 4,434 bytes +302‎ →‎Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: Go for it
• curprev 00:4700:47, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 4,132 bytes +5‎ added whitespace.
• curprev 00:4500:45, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 4,127 bytes +260‎ added comment about error checking.
• curprev 00:4300:43, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 3,867 bytes +164‎ added a comment about the wording/meaning of a "requirement".
• curprev 00:4000:40, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 3,703 bytes +145‎ →‎Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: added comment about not being able to view those characters.
• curprev 00:3500:35, 26 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 3,558 bytes +535‎ →‎Spec?: added comments concerning what choices there are.

30 November 2011

• curprev 23:1623:16, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>NevilleDNZ‎ m 3,023 bytes +391‎ →‎Additional Roman numerals: Ⅰ, Ⅴ, Ⅹ, Ⅼ, Ⅽ, Ⅾ, Ⅿ, ⅰ, ⅴ, ⅹ, ⅼ, ⅽ, ⅾ, ⅿ, ↀ, ↁ, ↂ, Ↄ: new section

9 May 2011

• curprev 21:1221:12, 9 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ m 2,632 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:Roman numerals to Talk:Roman numerals/Encode: Differentiate it from the Decode version
• curprev 21:1121:11, 9 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 2,632 bytes +156‎ →‎Parsing roman numerals: Cool...thanks for seeing that typo
• curprev 20:4820:48, 9 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Mikachu‎ 2,476 bytes +114‎ added it
• curprev 20:2720:27, 9 May 2011‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 2,362 bytes +217‎ →‎Parsing roman numerals
• curprev 20:0320:03, 9 May 2011‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 2,145 bytes +196‎ →‎Parsing roman numerals: Go ahead and create it?
• curprev 12:1512:15, 9 May 2011‎ 194.14.173.209 talk‎ 1,949 bytes +80‎ parsing?

30 July 2010

• curprev 12:1512:15, 30 July 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 1,869 bytes +230‎ →‎Perl problem: Noted
• curprev 08:4608:46, 30 July 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 1,639 bytes +239‎ →‎Perl problem: new section

6 February 2010

• curprev 14:4514:45, 6 February 2010‎ rosettacode>UnderBot‎ m 1,400 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:Roman Numerals to Talk:Roman numerals

1 April 2008

• curprev 21:3821:38, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>Dirkt‎ 1,400 bytes +568‎ No edit summary
• curprev 15:0915:09, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 832 bytes +72‎ →‎Spec?: Sounds good but more info is needed
• curprev 14:5314:53, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>IanOsgood‎ 760 bytes +191‎ New section: Spec?
• curprev 03:2203:22, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 569 bytes +57‎ Fixed negative numbers condition in Java
• curprev 03:2003:20, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 512 bytes +161‎ New section: 400
• curprev 03:1403:14, 1 April 2008‎ rosettacode>Waldorf‎ 351 bytes +351‎ New page: The Java example does not enforce the requirement that the parameter for the conversion function must be a positive integer. Enforcement of such a requirement should result in an error con...