Talk:Roman numerals/Encode: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(New section: Spec?) |
(→Spec?: Sounds good but more info is needed) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Roman numerals are by no means standardized. You should reference the particular brand of encoding you wish to support. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 08:53, 1 April 2008 (MDT) |
Roman numerals are by no means standardized. You should reference the particular brand of encoding you wish to support. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 08:53, 1 April 2008 (MDT) |
||
:What are our choices? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 09:09, 1 April 2008 (MDT) |
|||
Revision as of 15:09, 1 April 2008
The Java example does not enforce the requirement that the parameter for the conversion function must be a positive integer. Enforcement of such a requirement should result in an error condition, such as an exception, rather than simply no output when a value less than 1 is passed to the function.--Waldorf 21:14, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
- Fixed. --Mwn3d 21:22, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
400
I'm pretty sure CD is 400. If you look at wp:Roman_numerals#Modern_Roman_numerals it shows it. --Mwn3d 21:20, 31 March 2008 (MDT)
Spec?
Roman numerals are by no means standardized. You should reference the particular brand of encoding you wish to support. --IanOsgood 08:53, 1 April 2008 (MDT)
- What are our choices? --Mwn3d 09:09, 1 April 2008 (MDT)