Talk:Real-time computing: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Domain?) |
(constraint, not a paradigm) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: That depends on what is meant under "paradigm". Real-time computing is programming under certain non-functional constraints (time constraints). That makes things a lot more difficult, but that is not a paradigm meant as the most general approach to solving programming problems. But I agree that real-time programming looks OK in this category. Rather the category's name is wrong. Instead of "paradigm" it should be something else, maybe, "area", "field" of programming. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 07:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
: That depends on what is meant under "paradigm". Real-time computing is programming under certain non-functional constraints (time constraints). That makes things a lot more difficult, but that is not a paradigm meant as the most general approach to solving programming problems. But I agree that real-time programming looks OK in this category. Rather the category's name is wrong. Instead of "paradigm" it should be something else, maybe, "area", "field" of programming. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 07:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: Domain? Or is its application of the term too orthogonal to that of, e.g., document description or expert systems? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 09:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
:: Domain? Or is its application of the term too orthogonal to that of, e.g., document description or expert systems? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 09:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I'd say that real-time constraints are orthogonal to programming paradigm. For example, it would fall under the "Intended Use" column of the [[Language Comparison Table]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 17:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 28 April 2009
Can we count this as a programming paradigm? And maybe get more text on here about it? --Mwn3d 02:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- That depends on what is meant under "paradigm". Real-time computing is programming under certain non-functional constraints (time constraints). That makes things a lot more difficult, but that is not a paradigm meant as the most general approach to solving programming problems. But I agree that real-time programming looks OK in this category. Rather the category's name is wrong. Instead of "paradigm" it should be something else, maybe, "area", "field" of programming. --Dmitry-kazakov 07:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Domain? Or is its application of the term too orthogonal to that of, e.g., document description or expert systems? --Short Circuit 09:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say that real-time constraints are orthogonal to programming paradigm. For example, it would fall under the "Intended Use" column of the Language Comparison Table. --IanOsgood 17:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)