Talk:Order two numerical lists: Revision history

9 July 2019

• curprev 19:4719:47, 9 July 2019‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 18,935 bytes +49‎ added a section name to the first talk topic, this will also place the TOC correctly.

2 December 2011

• curprev 15:0615:06, 2 December 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 18,886 bytes +211‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 15:0115:01, 2 December 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 18,675 bytes +394‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?

1 December 2011

• curprev 17:3517:35, 1 December 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 18,281 bytes +359‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?: Doesn't seem as if it is.

30 November 2011

• curprev 19:0019:00, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 17,922 bytes +734‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 18:5018:50, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 17,188 bytes +546‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?
• curprev 18:2818:28, 30 November 2011‎ Sonia talk contribs‎ 16,642 bytes +263‎ <= not required for sorting
• curprev 18:1418:14, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 16,379 bytes +370‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?
• curprev 17:4517:45, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 16,009 bytes +466‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?: Alternative wording sugestion
• curprev 09:2609:26, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 15,543 bytes +1,304‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?
• curprev 09:1409:14, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 14,239 bytes +588‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 08:4208:42, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 13,651 bytes +388‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 08:3608:36, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 13,263 bytes +193‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?
• curprev 08:2108:21, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 13,070 bytes +780‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 07:2607:26, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Paddy3118‎ 12,290 bytes +2,157‎ →‎Is the task statement consistent?
• curprev 07:2007:20, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 10,133 bytes +500‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 05:5705:57, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 9,633 bytes +211‎ adding extra credit doesn't invalidate a solution.
• curprev 05:5405:54, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 9,422 bytes −32‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 05:5005:50, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 9,454 bytes +1,526‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 05:4805:48, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 7,928 bytes +1,536‎ →‎Lexicographic order
• curprev 05:1305:13, 30 November 2011‎ Sonia talk contribs‎ 6,392 bytes +120‎ boundary conditions
• curprev 04:4904:49, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ 6,272 bytes +138‎ more on test cases
• curprev 04:4704:47, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ m 6,134 bytes +118‎ →‎Lexicographic order: hmmm
• curprev 04:3304:33, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 6,016 bytes +1,144‎ →‎Stable Sort??
• curprev 04:2904:29, 30 November 2011‎ Sonia talk contribs‎ 4,872 bytes +378‎ suggested changes
• curprev 04:2804:28, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ 4,494 bytes 0‎ →‎Test Cases: and spelling sheesh
• curprev 04:2804:28, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ m 4,494 bytes +89‎ →‎Test Cases: tweak description for clarity
• curprev 04:2604:26, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Stormneedle‎ 4,405 bytes +271‎ question about the order
• curprev 04:0904:09, 30 November 2011‎ Sonia talk contribs‎ 4,134 bytes +559‎ think less, no invent <?= operator.
• curprev 03:4603:46, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ 3,575 bytes +231‎ very unclear
• curprev 03:2403:24, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ m 3,344 bytes +314‎ Stable sort, Huh?
• curprev 03:2103:21, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Dgamey‎ 3,030 bytes +1,543‎ test cases and draft
• curprev 02:3002:30, 30 November 2011‎ rosettacode>EMBee‎ 1,487 bytes +791‎ No edit summary

29 November 2011

• curprev 23:5523:55, 29 November 2011‎ rosettacode>Spoon!‎ 696 bytes +696‎ Created page with "The task description should clarify what should happen for two equal lists. Right now the description seems inconsistent. It says "return true if the first list should be ordere..."