Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/G(matrix ng, continued fraction n1, continued fraction n2): Difference between revisions
Talk:Continued fraction/Arithmetic/G(matrix ng, continued fraction n1, continued fraction n2) (view source)
Revision as of 10:31, 9 July 2015
, 8 years ago→Marking as draft: new section
(→Marking as draft: new section) |
|||
Line 21:
::::: Is your point that you want the task defining so that it has a unique solution? I have shown that both are used in other places so it is dificult to say one is right. Interestingly that which [[User:Spoon!|Spoon!]] says above is true for Python2 but Python3 returns a floating point. So if I define Q/R as A remainder B where A=trunc(Q/R) and B=Q-A*R Python2 will produce your answer and Python3 will produce the better answer. How cool is that? UberKool or what? A killer reason to upgrade to Python3!!!--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
== Marking as draft ==
I am marking this task as draft for reasons similar to [[Talk:Continued_fraction/Arithmetic/G(matrix_NG,_Contined_Fraction_N)#Marking_as_.22draft.22]] --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 10:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
| |||