Category talk:Recursion

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 01:50, 30 January 2008 by rosettacode>Mwn3d (Should be in the encyclopedia, but not as a subcategory)

I'm not too happy with my pseudocode. I added it because I've always found such concepts better explained through pseudocode. -Slawmaster 17:46, 27 January 2008 (MST)

Looks great actually. --Mwn3d 18:33, 27 January 2008 (MST)

--

I don't think that this sentence is true: "The factorial example is best done with a loop." I'm not editing it, though, since I don't quite know why it is there - given that one blatant counter-example (Scheme) is named right after it in the same paragraph. In some languages, the factorial might be best done with a loop, in some other languages, recursion would be the obvious (and best) approach. (In yet others, both might be equally powerful. And for all I know there's some language out there where something yet-completely-different is actually the best approach). Sgeier 16:40, 28 January 2008 (MST)


Is there a way to put the category page into the encyclopedia without making it a subcategory? --Mwn3d 18:50, 29 January 2008 (MST)

Retrieved from "https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category_talk:Recursion?oldid=55313"