User talk:Wamba: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
(Yep!)
Line 3: Line 3:
Thanks, --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
:I removed explanation to the talk page. Is it OK now? --[[User:Wamba|Wamba]] ([[User talk:Wamba|talk]]) 18:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
:I removed explanation to the talk page. Is it OK now? --[[User:Wamba|Wamba]] ([[User talk:Wamba|talk]]) 18:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

::many thanks Wamba. That's brill. Usually I manage to get the explanation into the incorrect message banner, but when you go to greater lengths and have code like you have, then it's best to put it in the talk page. Thanks again! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 23:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:23, 24 June 2015

Hi, when marking the perl5 example for best shuffle as incorrect you need to move the longer explanation to the talk page as a sub-section, leaving just the {{incorrect|Perl 6|See xxx in talk page}}.

Thanks, --Paddy3118 (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I removed explanation to the talk page. Is it OK now? --Wamba (talk) 18:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
many thanks Wamba. That's brill. Usually I manage to get the explanation into the incorrect message banner, but when you go to greater lengths and have code like you have, then it's best to put it in the talk page. Thanks again! --Paddy3118 (talk) 23:23, 24 June 2015 (UTC)