User talk:VincentArm: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
For comments, the non-alignment should not be a problem !! |
For comments, the non-alignment should not be a problem !! |
||
I will try to align them but the tab key does not give correct results. |
I will try to align them but the tab key does not give correct results. |
||
: Thank you for editing and aligning the comments. The updated version makes a much better impression and clearly communicates that ARM assembly doesn't look like chaos. :) |
|||
: Yep, mixing spaces and tabs for alignment doesn't really work. Therefore just pick one and use it consistently. |
|||
: --[[User:Roland Illig|Roland Illig]] ([[User talk:Roland Illig|talk]]) 20:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:48, 6 March 2019
Discussion VincentArm for arm assembly raspberry pi B+
100 doors
Hi Vincent,
https://www.rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=100_doors&diff=next&oldid=278041
The ARM assembly code you added looks messed up. This is because the @ characters are not aligned nicely. Could you make them all start in the same column?
It would also be nice if the two versions of the program were in two separate lang blocks, to not create the impression that ARM assembly takes twice as much code as other assembly code.
--Roland Illig (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Thank you for your comments. I corrected by separating in 2 blocks the 2 versions of the program. For comments, the non-alignment should not be a problem !! I will try to align them but the tab key does not give correct results.
- Thank you for editing and aligning the comments. The updated version makes a much better impression and clearly communicates that ARM assembly doesn't look like chaos. :)
- Yep, mixing spaces and tabs for alignment doesn't really work. Therefore just pick one and use it consistently.
- --Roland Illig (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)