User talk:Markjreed: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
Line 18: Line 18:
(anonymous function)recaptcha__en.js:334:318
(anonymous function)recaptcha__en.js:334:318
crecaptcha__en.js:318:833</pre></blockquote>--[[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed|talk]]) 23:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
crecaptcha__en.js:318:833</pre></blockquote>--[[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed|talk]]) 23:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
::OK. That should be enough for me to track it down. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] ([[User talk:Short Circuit|talk]]) 01:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:25, 30 December 2015

what the heck was that 'f"${v}%03d"' thing?

Didn't mean to make you gag. It's string interpolation. Works in Scala 2.10.

"%03d".format(v) is the better way to go. Works in older version of Scala. Doesn't invoke the gag reflex.

(Context: edited this page) I don't recall gagging; for one thing, I'm a Perl guy.  :) I figured it was some newfangled feature, but my Google-fu failed me, and the standard install on ubuntu and os x homebrew still gets me 2.9. So as you say, I went with the form that works on older Scala. Thanks for the explanation! Markjreed 02:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Captcha

Are captchas working now? Difficult for me to test. --Michael Mol (talk) 20:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Nope, at least not when trying to create a new page, e.g. http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=CSNOBOL4&action=edit&redlink=1 . At the bottom it says `To protect the wiki against automated page creation, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:`, but there is no CAPTCHA there to solve. If I turn on the js error console, I get this message:
Error: Missing required parameters in RecaptchaOptions: sitekey
Vjrecaptcha__en.js:159:117
worecaptcha__en.js:326:505
xorecaptcha__en.js:326:303
Eorecaptcha__en.js:331:392
(anonymous function)recaptcha__en.js:334:318
crecaptcha__en.js:318:833

--Markjreed (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

OK. That should be enough for me to track it down. --Michael Mol (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)