Anonymous user
User talk:JasonFruit: Difference between revisions
reply
m (→Licensing) |
(reply) |
||
Line 7:
: I suspect that was just there to say that their contributions are available under a more liberal license (something I value and do myself) and the usual »use at your own risk«. I doubt it was meant to subvert RC's licensing policy. —[[User:Hypftier|Johannes Rössel]] 20:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
That's precisely my intent --- the licensing guidelines for RC mentioned that it was okay to dual-license the code, and I intended this as an alternate license. The "but I don't recommend it" was just a tongue-in-cheek disclaimer of liability; obviously, if I'm willing to put my code up in public, I think it's unlikely to bring the whole interwebs to a screaming halt.
[[User:JasonFruit|JasonFruit]]
| |||