User talk:GordonCharlton: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Quackery) |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::::I would have done sets with bitwise operations. i.e. |
::::I would have done sets with bitwise operations. i.e. |
||
::::<lang>Quackery [ 0 ] is empty.set ( --> set ) |
::::<lang> Quackery [ 0 ] is empty.set ( --> set ) |
||
[ 26 bit 1 - ] constant is set.of.letters ( --> set ) |
[ 26 bit 1 - ] constant is set.of.letters ( --> set ) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
::::and so on. Something along those lines. |
::::and so on. Something along those lines. |
||
::::After the "fun" of coding Quackery in a language where formatting is part of the syntax I would never seek to impose a style on any part of Quackery. Develop your own in-house rules that you are comfortable with. Mine are based solely on making the source-code look super-consistent and fit nicely on a sheet of A4 with 12pt inconsolata for the book. Now they're a habit I feel no need to get out of. Good point about words that use ]'[ though. --[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 15:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC) |
::::After the "fun" of coding Quackery in a language where formatting is part of the syntax I would never seek to impose a style on any part of Quackery. Develop your own in-house rules that you are comfortable with. Mine are based solely on making the source-code look super-consistent and fit nicely on a sheet of A4 with 12pt inconsolata for the book. Now they're a habit I feel no need to get out of. Good point about words that use <code>]'[</code> though. --[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 15:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC) |