User talk:Edward H: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Please don't change "lang racket" into "lang lisp" -- they are very different languages. --~~~~") |
(Added reply to Elibarzilay) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please don't change "lang racket" into "lang lisp" -- they are very different languages. |
Please don't change "lang racket" into "lang lisp" -- they are very different languages. |
||
--[[User:Elibarzilay|Elibarzilay]] ([[User talk:Elibarzilay|talk]]) 05:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC) |
--[[User:Elibarzilay|Elibarzilay]] ([[User talk:Elibarzilay|talk]]) 05:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
Sorry, I thought it would be better using lisp syntax highlighting. I'll make sure not to do it again. |
|||
I've noticed that [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language)#Code_examples Racket's wikipedia page] uses Scheme highlighting - do you think that would be better or should everything be kept as it is? |
|||
--[[User:Edward H|Edward H]] ([[User talk:Edward H|talk]]) 17:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:21, 5 December 2013
Please don't change "lang racket" into "lang lisp" -- they are very different languages. --Elibarzilay (talk) 05:43, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought it would be better using lisp syntax highlighting. I'll make sure not to do it again.
I've noticed that Racket's wikipedia page uses Scheme highlighting - do you think that would be better or should everything be kept as it is?