User talk:Danaj: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 15:07, 27 October 2018

Wrong value for π

Oh the ignominy! Even 22/7 would have been more accurate... Thanks for catching this.

No worries, and it really has no impact on the output. I was just stumped for a second about the magic value. It should probably be done with a 'use constant PI => 3.141593;' at the top. Danaj (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Prime conspiracy

I am possibly confused about your statement "using an array rather than a hash to store transitions". Is this what you had in mind? Prime_conspiracy.pl I benchmarked, and didn't see a difference. But if you have a faster version, definitely put it on RC... --SqrtNegInf (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Oh the ignominy! Even 22/7 would have been more accurate... Thanks for catching this.
 : No worries, and it really has no impact on the output.  I was just stumped for a second about the magic value.  It should probably be done with a 'use constant PI => 3.141593;' at the top. [[User:Danaj|Danaj]] ([[User talk:Danaj|talk]]) 17:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
+== Prime conspiracy ==
+I am possibly confused about your statement "using an array rather than a hash to store transitions".  Is this what you had in mind?
+[https://gist.github.com/SqrtNegInf/f3e9ef2807f225946871b385aeae6826#file-prime_conspiracy-pl Prime_conspiracy.pl]
+I benchmarked, and didn't see a difference.  But if you have a faster version, definitely put it on RC... --[[User:SqrtNegInf|SqrtNegInf]] ([[User talk:SqrtNegInf|talk]]) 15:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)