User talk:Ce: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(Wishlist) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Well, there was a reason why I added "(where applicable)" to most of the subtasks. Note that for C++ references, several of the tasks were not doable as well, which I explicitly noted. I think it's also good to explicitly know that a certain thing is not supported in a language, rather than just no one bothered to write how to do it. Also, if some other language has a pointer/reference feature which isn't in C++, then it would be good to explicitly note that it's not possible in C++. |
:Well, there was a reason why I added "(where applicable)" to most of the subtasks. Note that for C++ references, several of the tasks were not doable as well, which I explicitly noted. I think it's also good to explicitly know that a certain thing is not supported in a language, rather than just no one bothered to write how to do it. Also, if some other language has a pointer/reference feature which isn't in C++, then it would be good to explicitly note that it's not possible in C++. |
||
:The "Language Features" category is a good idea, however. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] |
:The "Language Features" category is a good idea, however. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] |
||
=Wishlist= |
|||
Hey. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind stopping by [[Rosetta Code:Wiki Wishlist]], and perhaps leaving a few thoughts of your own. Also, do you use IRC? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 12:50, 1 March 2008 (MST) |
|||
Revision as of 19:50, 1 March 2008
I had to simplify the description of your programming task. As it was, it would have been very difficult to implement in languages other than C++. I moved it to the new Language Features category, where it will get more love. --Short Circuit 14:11, 26 January 2007 (EST)
- Humming a beatles song Love, Love, Love... Nha, just correcting a typo :) --CrashandDie 14:23, 26 January 2007 (EST)
- Well, there was a reason why I added "(where applicable)" to most of the subtasks. Note that for C++ references, several of the tasks were not doable as well, which I explicitly noted. I think it's also good to explicitly know that a certain thing is not supported in a language, rather than just no one bothered to write how to do it. Also, if some other language has a pointer/reference feature which isn't in C++, then it would be good to explicitly note that it's not possible in C++.
- The "Language Features" category is a good idea, however. --Ce
Wishlist
Hey. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind stopping by Rosetta Code:Wiki Wishlist, and perhaps leaving a few thoughts of your own. Also, do you use IRC? --Short Circuit 12:50, 1 March 2008 (MST)