User talk:Ce: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 20:41, 26 January 2007

I had to simplify the description of your programming task. As it was, it would have been very difficult to implement in languages other than C++. I moved it to the new Language Features category, where it will get more love. --Short Circuit 14:11, 26 January 2007 (EST)

Humming a beatles song Love, Love, Love... Nha, just correcting a typo :) --CrashandDie 14:23, 26 January 2007 (EST)

Well, there was a reason why I added "(where applicable)" to most of the subtasks. Note that for C++ references, several of the tasks were not doable as well, which I explicitly noted. I think it's also good to explicitly know that a certain thing is not supported in a language, rather than just no one bothered to write how to do it. Also, if some other language has a pointer/reference feature which isn't in C++, then it would be good to explicitly note that it's not possible in C++.

The "Language Features" category is a good idea, however. --Ce

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Humming a beatles song ''Love, Love, Love''... Nha, just correcting a typo :) --[[User:CrashandDie|CrashandDie]] 14:23, 26 January 2007 (EST)
+:Well, there was a reason why I added "(where applicable)" to most of the subtasks. Note that for C++ references, several of the tasks were not doable as well, which I explicitly noted. I think it's also good to explicitly know that a certain thing is not supported in a language, rather than just no one bothered to write how to do it. Also, if some other language has a pointer/reference feature which isn't in C++, then it would be good to explicitly note that it's not possible in C++.
+:The "Language Features" category is a good idea, however. --[[User:Ce|Ce]]