User talk:CalmoSoft: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(output) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Output== |
==Output== |
||
Hi. I've noticed that many of your Ring entries do not show output, even if the task requires it. For instance the Runge-Kutta task explicitly requires output, but the Ring code doesn't even seem to print anything. Output is important because it's often the only easy way we can tell if the code works as the task intended. [[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 13:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. I've noticed that many of your Ring entries do not show output, even if the task requires it. For instance the Runge-Kutta task explicitly requires output, but the Ring code doesn't even seem to print anything. Output is important because it's often the only easy way we can tell if the code works as the task intended. [[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 13:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Hello Fwend, |
|||
In the Ring "see" is the output command. |
|||
See the next line in the "Runge-Kutta method" program: |
|||
see "y(" + t + ") = " + y + " error = " + (actual - y) + nl ok |
|||
Greetings, |
|||
Gal Zsolt |
|||
(~ CalmoSoft ~) |
|||
Revision as of 15:02, 30 March 2016
Output
Hi. I've noticed that many of your Ring entries do not show output, even if the task requires it. For instance the Runge-Kutta task explicitly requires output, but the Ring code doesn't even seem to print anything. Output is important because it's often the only easy way we can tell if the code works as the task intended. Fwend (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Fwend,
In the Ring "see" is the output command. See the next line in the "Runge-Kutta method" program:
see "y(" + t + ") = " + y + " error = " + (actual - y) + nl ok
Greetings, Gal Zsolt (~ CalmoSoft ~)