User talk:Arjun sunel/Solvability of a 3x3x3 Rubik's Cube State?: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 13:31, 13 April 2013 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎WTF?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:36, 13 April 2013 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎WTF?) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I would make a page Rubiks Cube which explained the cube and it motions: including a naming scheme for each square, a scheme for describing moves. As children of that I would add tasks based on Rubik's Cube which can be solved by a computer. Three suggested here are: Permutation Parity Test; Corner Parity Test; and Edge Parity Test. I think each of these would be worthy of a task in their own right, and others could be added.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 13:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)		:I would make a page Rubiks Cube which explained the cube and it motions: including a naming scheme for each square, a scheme for describing moves. As children of that I would add tasks based on Rubik's Cube which can be solved by a computer. Three suggested here are: Permutation Parity Test; Corner Parity Test; and Edge Parity Test. I think each of these would be worthy of a task in their own right, and others could be added.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 13:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

			:If there is interest in this then understanding how these rules extend into 4 dimensions as an attempt to visualize and solve 4D Rubik Cubes is even more interesting.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 13:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)