User:Gerard Schildberger: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (changed some verbiage, added SPS.) |
m (added a few changes.) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{mylang|IBM assembler & macros (370)|was pretty good, now, not so much}} |
{{mylang|IBM assembler & macros (370)|was pretty good, now, not so much}} |
||
{{mylang|IBM 407 plugboard|good enough to get a job when 407s come back}} |
{{mylang|IBM 407 plugboard|good enough to get a job when 407s come back}} |
||
{{mylang|IRAP|author}} |
{{mylang|IRAP|interactive computation with plotting, author}} |
||
{{mylang|Java|poor, but dangerous (big gun, large feet)}} |
{{mylang|Java|poor, but dangerous (big gun, large feet)}} |
||
{{mylang|JavaScript|see the program below}} |
{{mylang|JavaScript|see the program below}} |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<br>Funniest thing I ever read in an ''The IBM Journal'' article. <br><br><br> |
<br>Funniest thing I ever read in an ''The IBM Journal'' article. <br><br><br> |
||
<big> BPL </big> ─── (<u>B</u>asic <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) was a Honeywell (co-developed with a Japanese company) developed subset of the IBM PL/I language (I was one of a dozen or so programmers/authors at Honeywell). <br><br><br> |
<big> BPL </big> ─── (<u>B</u>asic <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) was a Honeywell (co-developed with a Japanese company) developed subset of the IBM PL/I language (I was one of a dozen or so BPL programmers/authors at Honeywell). <br><br><br> |
||
<big> HPL </big> ─── (<u>H</u>oneywell <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) was a subset of PL/I (similar to above) and was to be used for Honeywell's new computer (code name unknown) ─── it was never built, but from what I could glean from the specs, it would have used HPL as it's native [machine] language and seemed to have some of the characteristics of IBM's '''FS''' system (and apparently, suffered the same fate). <br>'''FS''' = '''F'''uture '''S'''ystem. <br><br><br> |
<big> HPL </big> ─── (<u>H</u>oneywell <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) was a subset of PL/I (similar to above) and was to be used for Honeywell's new computer (code name unknown) ─── it was never built, but from what I could glean from the specs, it would have used HPL as it's native [machine] language and seemed to have some of the characteristics of IBM's '''FS''' system (and apparently, suffered the same fate). <br>'''FS''' = '''F'''uture '''S'''ystem. <br><br><br> |