Template talk:Codepad: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Probably not.) |
(make it optional, and why) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should the ability to link to Codepad be moved into part of the main language template? --[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] |
Should the ability to link to Codepad be moved into part of the main language template? --[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] |
||
: Codepad has support for a limited number of languages; It shouldn't be part of the main language template unless it supports all the languages the main language template is used on. I suspect you can imagine the likelyhood of that. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 00:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
: Codepad has support for a limited number of languages; It shouldn't be part of the main language template unless it supports all the languages the main language template is used on. I suspect you can imagine the likelyhood of that. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 00:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
::It could be made optional like the various characteristics-of-the-language parameters. And having it in the language template has the advantage that the Codepad link will be in a guaranteed standard place across all language pages. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 01:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:04, 16 August 2009
Should the ability to link to Codepad be moved into part of the main language template? --Donal Fellows
- Codepad has support for a limited number of languages; It shouldn't be part of the main language template unless it supports all the languages the main language template is used on. I suspect you can imagine the likelyhood of that. --Short Circuit 00:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- It could be made optional like the various characteristics-of-the-language parameters. And having it in the language template has the advantage that the Codepad link will be in a guaranteed standard place across all language pages. --Kevin Reid 01:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)