Talk:Word search: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::::: That's what the Java code does, but it still allows a larger word to embed a smaller word later. Imagine that you've placed the word "one", then the word "done" could be laid over it.[[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 17:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC) |
::::: That's what the Java code does, but it still allows a larger word to embed a smaller word later. Imagine that you've placed the word "one", then the word "done" could be laid over it.[[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 17:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
:::::: Oh, I overlooked that possibility. Still... you could pregenerate a list of words (maybe 50 of them) at the start and run the containment check against that list. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) |
:::::: Oh, I overlooked that possibility. Still... you could pregenerate a list of words (maybe 50 of them) at the start and run the containment check against that list. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) |
||
::::::: Sure, you could check it, but the task already has plenty of constraints, I don't think this one is really necessary. [[User:Fwend|Fwend]] ([[User talk:Fwend|talk]]) 18:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||