Talk:Walk a directory/Non-recursively: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(globs) |
(→globs: Go ahead and update it.) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Using a glob is not the same as walking a directory. A number of the solutions are pointless. |
Using a glob is not the same as walking a directory. A number of the solutions are pointless. |
||
:Go ahead and update the task page with a more specific description; It was done once before with walking trees. (Also, sign your posts with - - ~ ~ ~ ~ (sans spaces.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 19:58, 9 October 2007 (MDT) |
|||
Revision as of 01:58, 10 October 2007
Some of these examples recurse and some do not. They should be different tasks.
- Done. See Walk Directory Tree --Short Circuit 11:00, 28 January 2007 (EST)
This task is unclear. When I first read it I thought it meant "print the names of the files that match a pattern. Only later did I realize that the content of the files was meant. Sgeier 00:59, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- Gah. It should read names; File I/O is outside the scope of this task. I'll fix the task description, but the programming examples will need review. --Short Circuit 09:50, 31 January 2007 (EST)
- I don't know Ada or Haskell, the others now do the right (clarified) thing. Sgeier 01:50, 1 February 2007 (EST)
globs
Using a glob is not the same as walking a directory. A number of the solutions are pointless.
- Go ahead and update the task page with a more specific description; It was done once before with walking trees. (Also, sign your posts with - - ~ ~ ~ ~ (sans spaces.) --Short Circuit 19:58, 9 October 2007 (MDT)