Talk:Vigenère cipher/Cryptanalysis: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not completely sure how algorithmically feasible this task is, but it at least sounds interesting. (Well, I'm not sure how feasible it is to do this completely automatically.) I'll try to add an example soon. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 05:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
I'm not completely sure how algorithmically feasible this task is, but it at least sounds interesting. (Well, I'm not sure how feasible it is to do this completely automatically.) I'll try to add an example soon. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 05:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
: C++ code added, but I'm not sure about how robust it is. There seems like a decent chance that the first part will pass a too-short key, and the second part doesn't have any checks on the final output. Another chi-squared check doesn't work, which also makes me suspect that the chi-squared check in the first part isn't the best solution either, even if it does ok. [[User:MagiMaster|MagiMaster]] 11:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:28, 31 May 2011
I'm not completely sure how algorithmically feasible this task is, but it at least sounds interesting. (Well, I'm not sure how feasible it is to do this completely automatically.) I'll try to add an example soon. MagiMaster 05:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- C++ code added, but I'm not sure about how robust it is. There seems like a decent chance that the first part will pass a too-short key, and the second part doesn't have any checks on the final output. Another chi-squared check doesn't work, which also makes me suspect that the chi-squared check in the first part isn't the best solution either, even if it does ok. MagiMaster 11:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)