Talk:Verhoeff algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 11:21, 25 February 2022

Omitted algorithm

It's bad practice to omit the algorithm from the task description. --Rdm (talk) 23:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, if it's considered good practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --PureFox (talk) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

"lengthy and needless repetition..." I resemble that remark. I usually try to err on the side of too much information rather than not enough. Not 100% of the time but pretty darn often. --Thundergnat (talk) 11:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:19, 25 February 2022 (view source) PureFox (talk \| contribs) (→‎Omitted algorithm: Responded.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:21, 25 February 2022 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Omitted algorithm: usual suspect) Newer edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:Well, if it's considered ''good'' practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)		:Well, if it's considered ''good'' practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

			::"lengthy and needless repetition..." I resemble that remark. I usually try to err on the side of too much information rather than not enough. Not 100% of the time but pretty darn often. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 11:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)