Talk:Verhoeff algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 10:19, 25 February 2022

Omitted algorithm

It's bad practice to omit the algorithm from the task description. --Rdm (talk) 23:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, if it's considered good practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --PureFox (talk) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:07, 25 February 2022 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) m (Meh.. the wikipedia page is probably stable and complete enough. But it's still bad practice to not describe the task on the task page) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:19, 25 February 2022 (view source) PureFox (talk \| contribs) (→‎Omitted algorithm: Responded.) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It's bad practice to omit the algorithm from the task description. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 23:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)		It's bad practice to omit the algorithm from the task description. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 23:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

			:Well, if it's considered ''good'' practice to indulge in lengthy and needless repetition from a non-ephemeral source with full past history, then I'm guilty as charged but unrepentant. --[[User:PureFox\|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox\|talk]]) 10:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)