Anonymous user
Talk:URL encoding: Difference between revisions
I think this task is ready for promotion.
(I think this task is ready for promotion.) |
|||
Line 29:
:I can think of several ways to approach this. One would be to move the information to another page and link to it from here. Another would be to change the task itself. That said, personally, I do not see much use in "preserving characters". There is a minor bulk advantage, but all encoded characters will pass through safely. So the safest interpretation of multiple standards would be to encode any character suggested by any of them (and there are a variety of standards...). --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 01:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
::I think we have mostly covered this now. The provision for an exception string allows for variations. For this task I don't really want a space to be encoded as a plus symbol, as this is not common and would also require a decoder with the reverse capability. A separate task is required for such a variation, if desired.
I think this task is ready for promotion. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 17:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||