Talk:Truth table: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 20:39, 28 April 2012

Inspiration

Inspired by a mention of truth tables here (Thanks Mike), which reminded me of an old blog post of mine. --Paddy3118 07:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Always glad to inspire :). --Mwn3d 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Which operators?

Just to get ahead of a possible question, which operators should this program support? And, or, and not are pretty much locks, but do we need implication operators? Xor? --Mwn3d 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

And, or, not as a minimum; but if the rest are just more of the same then they could be left out for brevity. --Paddy3118 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

From a website I found, the ^ boolean operator is an AND and almost all examples here seem to use it as as the

C

OR operator. This same website didn't even mention (or use) the & [AND] operator. The list that I used is in the REXX example. I'll change it if the consenus say that's incorrect, since there seems to be a very heavy

C

influence in Rosetta Code. I think it may be better to have consistency in the coding and examples. -- Gerard Schildberger 20:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:34, 28 April 2012 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎Which operators?: expanded on my original comment.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:39, 28 April 2012 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (changed format/font/style of some text.) Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:And, or, not as a minimum; but if the rest are just more of the same then they could be left out for brevity. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)		:And, or, not as a minimum; but if the rest are just more of the same then they could be left out for brevity. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

	:From a website I found, the ^ boolean operator is an <tt> AND </tt> and almost all examples here seem to use it as as the <tt> C OR </tt> operator). This same website didn't even mention (or use) the & [<tt> AND </tt>] operator. The list that I used is in the REXX example. I'll change it if the consenus say that's incorrect, since there seems to be a very heavy <tt> C </tt> influence in Rosetta Code. I think it may be better to have consistency in the coding and examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)		: From a website I found, the ^ boolean operator is an <tt> AND </tt> and almost all examples here seem to use it as as the <math> C </math> <tt> OR </tt> operator. This same website didn't even mention (or use) the & [<tt>AND</tt>] operator. The list that I used is in the REXX example. I'll change it if the consenus say that's incorrect, since there seems to be a very heavy <math> C </math> influence in Rosetta Code. I think it may be better to have consistency in the coding and examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)