Talk:Strange unique prime triplets: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added a (new) talk section.) |
m (added another talk topic.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Nothing was mentioned about '''n, m,''' and '''p''' being unique or not. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
Nothing was mentioned about '''n, m,''' and '''p''' being unique or not. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
== other definitions of '''strange''' primes == |
|||
Note that there are other definitions of '''strange''' primes. |
|||
One possibility is to rename this Rosetta Code task to: '''strange triple primes''' or |
|||
<br>'''strange triple primes summing to a prime''', or somesuch. |
|||
'''Mathoverflow''' has different definition at: |
|||
[https://mathoverflow.net/questions/363703/strange-and-non-strange-prime-numbers-are-there-infinitely-many-of-them strange and non strange prime numbers are there infinitely many of them]. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:28, 10 March 2021
uniqueness of the prime numbers being added
How about: 3 + 3 + 11
Nothing was mentioned about n, m, and p being unique or not. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
other definitions of strange primes
Note that there are other definitions of strange primes.
One possibility is to rename this Rosetta Code task to: strange triple primes or
strange triple primes summing to a prime, or somesuch.
Mathoverflow has different definition at:
strange and non strange prime numbers are there infinitely many of them. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)