Talk:Strange unique prime triplets: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→added a stretch goal: Further comment.) |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
::::::Well, I was just using the Go and Wren timings to get some idea of how long it would take for languages of their ilk to complete a higher stretch goal. But, fair enough, let's just leave it at '''1,000'''. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 14:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
::::::Well, I was just using the Go and Wren timings to get some idea of how long it would take for languages of their ilk to complete a higher stretch goal. But, fair enough, let's just leave it at '''1,000'''. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 14:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
::::::Certainly 28 billion in 48 minutes (you know who you are) has gone too far, without some better or interesting or clever approach. <br> |
|||
::::::[I take any timings with a big pinch of salt, mostly don't really care that much about 4 or 8x, but certainly want to see any 20 or 100x.]<br> |
|||
::::::However, I would strongly defend the right of any draft task to be a "moving target" for at least 5 days, besides, no-one is forced to post an entry until things settle down. Otherwise, point taken, I largely agree, elegance beats speed anyday. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC) |