Talk:Sorting algorithms/Stooge sort: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→ooRexx / NetRexx Questions: Reply to Walter's questions) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 13:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 13:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
: In this case the solution is translated from NetRexx which uses the <tt>java.util.List</tt> collection. Java's <tt>List</tt> class uses <tt>get()</tt> and <tt>set()</tt> where ooRexx uses <tt>at()</tt> and <tt>put()</tt>. The <tt>NList</tt> class implements a clean way to add these methods to ooRexx's <tt>List</tt> as an aid to translation. --[[User:Alansam|Alansam]] 15:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
: In this case the solution is translated from NetRexx which uses the <tt>java.util.List</tt> collection. Java's <tt>List</tt> class uses <tt>get()</tt> and <tt>set()</tt> where ooRexx uses <tt>at()</tt> and <tt>put()</tt>. The <tt>NList</tt> class implements a clean way to add these methods to ooRexx's <tt>List</tt> as an aid to translation. --[[User:Alansam|Alansam]] 15:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
--- |
|||
Thanks for the answers |
|||
I'd rather read ii instead of i_ but at least you told me why. |
|||
But the comment on java should be removed or rephrased. |
|||
You don't USE the java here, do you? |
|||
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 15:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC) |